15
Rejected
Clarify and resolve the conservation translocation licensing regime inconsistencies.
Recommendation
There is little support for the current conservation translocation licensing regime: on the one hand some stakeholders said that it is too bureaucratic, and, on the other we heard that the existing system is not stringent enough. As a priority, the England Species Reintroductions Taskforce should seek to clarify and resolve this situation. The Government should clarify its position on reintroduction licensing.
Government Response Summary
The government rejected the need to clarify or resolve concerns about the reintroduction licensing regime, asserting that assessing applications on a case-by-case basis allows for comprehensive and proportionate consideration of species, circumstances, and risks.
Paragraph Reference
41
Government Response
Rejected
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
Assessing applications for release licences on a case-by-case basis allows for the nature of the species, along with the circumstances and risks of release, to be comprehensively considered in response to a specific proposal. Further, an assumption of a species being of low risk without sufficient evidence may undermine efforts to ensure best practice and result in unintended consequences or impacts being found at a later date. Individual assessment allows for the impacts of a specific proposal to be understood, and requirements for consultation and consideration of impacts to be applied proportionality.
Source
Inquiry
Species Reintroduction
Report
Fifth Report - Species Reintroduction
11 Jul 2023
HC 849
Timeline
Recommendation age
2.9 yrs
Report published
11 Jul 2023