6 Not Addressed

The Government should make use of existing EU-UK dialogue mechanisms to support UK alignment with...

Recommendation
The Government should make use of existing EU-UK dialogue mechanisms to support UK alignment with EU REACH to avoid unnecessary regulatory divergence. Whilst UK Government may choose a different approach in some areas, without such alignment, UK manufacturers risk accidentally being placed at a competitive disadvantage, and the UK public may face greater exposure to PFAS due to the absence of the more precautionary approach being pursued in the EU. (Recommendation, Paragraph 36) 43
Government Response Summary
The government's response focuses on agreeing with the potential benefits of a group-based approach to PFAS regulation and how it draws on scientific expertise, but it does not address the recommendation to use EU-UK dialogue mechanisms to support alignment with EU REACH and avoid regulatory divergence.
Government Response
Not Addressed
HM Government Not Addressed
The government agrees with the Committee on the potential benefits of a group-based approach to PFAS regulation in addressing risks more effectively and efficiently and already draws on extensive independent scientific and regulatory expertise in this area. As set out in our response to recommendation 3 and 4, we await to see the final EU REACH universal PFAS restriction, including how it applies a group- based approach. The HSE’s Regulatory Management Options Analysis (RMOA) on PFAS set out a clear rationale for a grouping approach based on OECD’s foundational work. The RMOA was recognised by Defra’s independent Hazardous Substances Advisory Committee (HSAC) as “comprehensive and well researched”, with a methodology that is “thorough and logical” and provides a reasoned basis for grouping PFAS. Together, this evidence will help ensure any future UK approach is effective, proportionate and grounded in the best available science.