The government agrees and commits to introducing a tailored humanitarian exemption or ‘carve-out’ across autonomous UK sanctions when parliamentary time allows. They also state OFSI has comprehensive guidance and will continue working to produce clear guidance for humanitarian actors.

The government partially agrees, stating it already actively engages with UN Member States and co-sponsored UNSCR 2730, which addresses humanitarian personnel protection and will lead to a UN Secretary-General's report. It also supports the inclusion of humanitarian access in UN reports and commits to continue doing so, but does not specifically commit to calling for a Special Session of the UNSC focused on hearing from aid workers.

The government partially agrees, stating it already has a robust export control regime and will publish an annual report on UK strategic export controls. However, it rejects commitments to an independent review of past allegations, independent audits, or temporary freezing of licences.

The government partially agrees, stating it already assesses IHL risks and wider security context, including risks to aid workers, for export licences, and will publish an annual report on strategic export controls. However, it rejects providing for interim licence freezing and independent audits of arms exports due to policy and operational reasons.

The government agrees to commemorate aid worker sacrifices, noting it already marks World Humanitarian Day, attends memorial services, delivers speeches for UNSCR 2730, and has introduced the Humanitarian Medal. It welcomes the suggestion to update Parliament on this issue as feasible.

The government agrees to work on identifying responses to disinformation, citing existing FCDO efforts like a programme in Sudan. However, it clarifies the BBC World Service's editorial independence and does not commit to directly ensuring its funding as a government tool for countering disinformation.

The government partially agrees, stating they cannot commit resources to extend direct security and mental health services to third parties. However, they are open to sharing the rationale for their strategic approach to staff welfare and wellbeing and encourage mutual information exchange with interested partners.

The government partially agrees, stating that while they support partners' access to insurance, the choice of provider lies with partners. They note flexible funding guidelines and due diligence processes that ensure partners consider staff wellbeing, highlighting the HAVEN programme in Ukraine as an example.