11th Report - UK Aid and Development Assistance in a Fracturing World: Strengthening Resilience and Cooperation

Select Committee

International Development Committee HC 1835 28 April 2026

Report Status Government responded

Conclusions & Recommendations 4 items (3 recs)

Source View on Parliament website

Government Response (AI assessment · 4 of 4 classified)

Accepted in Part 1

Acknowledged 2

Not Addressed 1

Government response

2nd Special Report - UK Aid and Development Assistance in a Fracturing World: Strengthening Resilience and Cooperation: Government Response · published 8 Jul 2026

Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker

Recommendations & Conclusions

4 results

1 Recommendation Acknowledged

In the coming months we expect to see much greater transparency from the Government over...

Recommendation

In the coming months we expect to see much greater transparency from the Government over the evidence base for its newly articulated approach to international relief and development and the tangible impact it expects this to have. We anticipate more … Read more

Government Response Summary

The government partially agrees, stating their approach draws on established evidence and that measurement of the shifts is part of ongoing discussions. They do not commit to specific timelines or methods for increased transparency on the evidence base or communication of results.

Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

View Details

2 Recommendation Accepted in Part

In its response to this report, we request the Government provides more detail on its...

Recommendation

In its response to this report, we request the Government provides more detail on its approach in areas where this is sorely lacking, and clarify its own policy position. This will serve to reassure Parliament, the sector, and the public … Read more In its response to this report, we request the Government provides more detail on its approach in areas where this is sorely lacking, and clarify its own policy position. This will serve to reassure Parliament, the sector, and the public that the policy announcements made to date are part of a coherent approach to ODA programming and work as part of a clear theory of change. Specifically, the Government must: a. Outline the evidence base for the “four essential shifts” and how this will be used to evaluate their success. A clear qualitative and quantitative description of what success looks like is required and over what time scale. It should also include a model for how development partnerships are envisaged to operate with clearly defined roles for FCDO missions, external stakeholders and departmental support. b. Provide a description of its approach to engaging with multilaterals with an evidence base for the choices of which organisations and mechanisms it will invest in, prioritising institutions with a proven track record of delivery. This should be accompanied by a measurable and time-bound plan for reform and a detailed approach for how alignment with UK priorities will be achieved. c. Set out an account of the risk and impact assessment exercises, beyond the Equalities Risk Assessment, that the Department has undertaken around the reductions and reprioritising of ODA. This should include details of the measures taken to mitigate risks, including: discussions with other ODA-delivering countries; 14 communication with bilateral development partners; and intentional efforts to ensure the UK’s multilateral contributions fill the gaps left by the reprioritising of bilateral ODA. d. Present a clear strategy for how the Government will engage with civil society in the UK around development challenges. Specifically, how the Government will work to ensure the energy and resources of diaspora groups and UK-based NGOs complement its own priorities for the spending of Show less

Government Response Summary

The government partially agrees, stating that the "four essential shifts" are based on a well-established evidence base and that it is working to improve measurement of outcomes and impact as part of the FCDO2030 transformation. It commits to measuring how the shifts are embedded, acknowledging the need for robust qualitative and quantitative assessments, but does not provide specific metrics or timescales in this response.

Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

View Details

3 Conclusion Acknowledged

From the evidence we have received, and applying it to what we know of the...

Conclusion

From the evidence we have received, and applying it to what we know of the Government’s approach, we have prepared a document to convert the Government’s ambitions into a policy to alleviate poverty. This outlines some of the key considerations … Read more

Government Response Summary

The government acknowledged receipt of the report and the appended policy paper, expressing gratitude to the committee for its work.

Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

View Details

4 Recommendation Not Addressed

We recommend that the Government considers Appendix 1 as a working policy document for its...

Recommendation

We recommend that the Government considers Appendix 1 as a working policy document for its approach to aid and development. In its response, we request that the Government indicates where it agrees or disagrees with the Committee’s policy paper and … Read more

Government Response Summary

The government did not indicate whether it considers Appendix 1 as a working policy document for aid and development, but did respond to specific issues raised within the Committee's policy paper by detailing existing policies and actions on refugee costs and project pipelines.

Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

View Details