First Report - The role and status of the Prime Minister’s Office

Select Committee
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee HC 67 9 June 2021
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 9 items (4 recs)
Government Response (AI assessment · 9 of 9 classified)
Government response
Third Special Report - The role and status of the Prime Minister’s Office: Government Response to the Committee’s First Report · published 21 Sep 2021

Recommendations & Conclusions

9 results
1 Conclusion Accepted
Para 35
The lack of a statutory definition of the roles of the Prime Minister or the...
Conclusion
The lack of a statutory definition of the roles of the Prime Minister or the Cabinet in the UK has been reflected in the evolution of the Office of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet Office. As Prime Ministers have … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government describes the close working relationship and shared resources between the Prime Minister's Office and the Cabinet Office, highlighting recent organizational changes such as a new Delivery Unit in No10 and a Government Strategic Management Office.
2 Recommendation Acknowledged
There should be a clearer delineation between those resources provided to support the Prime Minister...
Recommendation
There should be a clearer delineation between those resources provided to support the Prime Minister and the support for collective government and cross-government activity more generally. (Paragraph 36) Accountability
Government Response Summary
The government describes the existing integrated structure of the Prime Minister's Office and Cabinet Office, notes recent structural changes, and acknowledges there is scope for further consideration and continuous improvement of systems.
3 Conclusion Rejected
Para 41
The Office of the Prime Minister is nominally a business unit of the Cabinet Office.
Conclusion
The Office of the Prime Minister is nominally a business unit of the Cabinet Office. However, it currently it appears to operate with even less transparency than other Cabinet Office business units. The Cabinet Office Annual Report and Accounts do … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government explains that narrative sections are not for all business units and that separating the Prime Minister's Office would be misleading due to its integrated relationship with the Cabinet, asserting the current approach is appropriate.
4 Recommendation Rejected
Para 42
We do not consider the status of the Office of Prime Minister as a business...
Recommendation
We do not consider the status of the Office of Prime Minister as a business unit to be an accurate reflection of the role that it plays. Yet it currently operates with even less transparency that this status suggests. For … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to report on the Prime Minister's Office activities as it does for other business units. It argues that doing so would be misleading and difficult due to the historical and ongoing close relationship and overlapping responsibilities between the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
5 Recommendation Rejected
Para 43
In its Single Departmental Plan, the objectives of supporting the Prime Minister should be disaggregated...
Recommendation
In its Single Departmental Plan, the objectives of supporting the Prime Minister should be disaggregated from the support provided to the Cabinet or the Government more generally.
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating that disaggregating the Prime Minister's support from the Cabinet's would be misleading and difficult due to their historically close relationship and overlapping responsibilities. They explain that the Annual Report and Accounts do not cover all business units.
6 Conclusion Accepted
Para 49
We have heard little evidence to support the creation of a separate Department for the...
Conclusion
We have heard little evidence to support the creation of a separate Department for the Prime Minister. The current Office of the Prime Minister is too small and much of its workforce too transient to be sensibly treated as a … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government explains the difficulty in delineating the work of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, and highlights existing efforts through Outcome Delivery Plans and the Declaration of Government Reform that aim to improve planning, performance, and collective working at the centre of government.
7 Conclusion Not Addressed
Whilst the creation of a separate department would help to resolve some of the accountability...
Conclusion
Whilst the creation of a separate department would help to resolve some of the accountability issues that have concerned us in this inquiry, these could be resolved more easily through greater transparency within the existing arrangements. (Paragraph 50) 22 The … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government explains the difficulty in delineating the work of the Prime Minister and Cabinet for transparency purposes and points to existing initiatives like Outcome Delivery Plans and the Declaration of Government Reform to improve general government efficiency and accountability.
8 Conclusion Accepted
Para 56
Increasing the direct accountability of the most senior Spads in Number 10 in this way...
Conclusion
Increasing the direct accountability of the most senior Spads in Number 10 in this way would reflect the quasi-executive role that some have assumed. However, to do so would be to accept this quasi-executive role. The principle that “advisers advise, … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that the existing Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, along with the Code of Conduct for Special Advisers and Model Contract, already provide clear parameters for their roles and ensure ministerial accountability. It asserts that the current Code sufficiently clarifies what Special Advisers may and may not do.
9 Recommendation Accepted
The role of Special Advisers in Number 10 has evolved to such a degree that...
Recommendation
The role of Special Advisers in Number 10 has evolved to such a degree that some have played a quasi-executive role. This is wrong. It undermines both ministerial accountability to Parliament and collective responsibility on the part of Cabinet. Ministers, … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government asserts that the roles and accountability of Special Advisers are already clearly defined by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 and the Code of Conduct, and that Ministers remain fully accountable for their actions within these existing parameters.