3 Not Addressed

Improved data collection and the application of lessons from it are key to addressing under-representation.

Recommendation
Improved data collection and the application of lessons from it are key to addressing under-representation. We welcome the biannual Research and Innovation workforce survey being led by BEIS, and the Government’s recognition of the need to better capture the diversity challenge on the basis of characteristics other than gender— such as ethnicity, disability, sexuality, and socio-economic background. A survey can, however, only ever provide a snapshot, whilst concerted, targeted action would be better informed by a longitudinal study. The Government should set out how it plans to make the Research and Innovation workforce survey meaningfully useful across different departments, non-departmental bodies and the wider STEM sector. The forthcoming results must be accompanied by an action plan, and the survey should have the ability to undertake analysis by STEM occupation built in. (Paragraph 33) STEM education in schools
Government Response Summary
The government's response only mentions its ambition on STEM, without addressing the specific recommendation to set out how it plans to make the Research and Innovation workforce survey meaningfully useful or to include an action plan with the forthcoming results.
Government Response
Not Addressed
HM Government Not Addressed
Government Ambition on STEM
Addressee Bodies
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Timeline
Recommendation age 3.2 yrs
Report published 24 Mar 2023