Third Report - The UK Shared Prosperity Fund and Scotland

Select Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee HC 52 9 July 2021
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 9 items (9 recs)
Government Response (AI assessment · 9 of 9 classified)
Government response
Second Special Report - The UK Shared Prosperity Fund and Scotland: Government Response to the Committee’s Third Report · published 27 Oct 2021

Recommendations & Conclusions

9 results
1 Recommendation Accepted
Para 11
We welcome the UK Government’s original intentions to formally consult on the UK Shared Prosperity...
Recommendation
We welcome the UK Government’s original intentions to formally consult on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), and its early efforts to engage local authorities in Scotland. However, we are concerned that a formal consultation has not taken place, given … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it has been engaging widely with stakeholders on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund since 2016 through various events and roundtables, implicitly indicating these efforts address the need for consultation without committing to a new formal public consultation by autumn 2021.
Scotland Office
View Details
2 Recommendation Accepted
Para 12
The UKSPF could bring significant benefits to Scotland if it is designed and delivered effectively.
Recommendation
The UKSPF could bring significant benefits to Scotland if it is designed and delivered effectively. Collaboration between the UK and Scottish Governments and local authorities will be vital to ensuring that the UKSPF uses the expertise built up through decades … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepts the need for collaboration, detailing various ongoing and planned engagement mechanisms with the Scottish Government, including their place in governance structures, regular official engagement, ministerial meetings, and the establishment of an Interministerial Group.
Scotland Office
View Details
3 Recommendation Deferred
Para 16
We welcome the UK Government’s commitment that all UK nations will receive at least the...
Recommendation
We welcome the UK Government’s commitment that all UK nations will receive at least the same amount of funds under UKSPF as under the EU Funds. It is, however, unclear how much funding will be available per year, even as … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that the UK Shared Prosperity Fund's multi-year funding profile, including annual allocations for the UK and Scotland, will be set out at the next Spending Review and further details published later in 2021.
Scotland Office
View Details
4 Recommendation Deferred
The UK Government must clarify how and when EU rural development funding, including the European...
Recommendation
The UK Government must clarify how and when EU rural development funding, including the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and European Maritime Fisheries Fund (EMFF), will be replaced. Otherwise, there is a risk that expertise and capacity built … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government will consider at Spending Review 2021 whether to replace LEADER and EAFRD funding through the UK Shared Prosperity Fund or other farm support programmes, thereby deferring clarification on how and when this funding will be replaced.
Scotland Office
View Details
5 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Para 24
It is unclear how the CRF will feed into the development of the UKSPF.
Recommendation
It is unclear how the CRF will feed into the development of the UKSPF. In March 2022, a year after it began, the UK Government should evaluate the Community Renewal Fund and publish its findings on how well the fund … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states the UK Community Renewal Fund will inform the design of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund and describes active research and stakeholder engagement to learn lessons, but does not commit to a formal evaluation and publication of findings by March 2022.
Scotland Office
View Details
6 Recommendation Acknowledged
Para 25
A lack of transparency in the selection process for the UKSPF could damage trust in...
Recommendation
A lack of transparency in the selection process for the UKSPF could damage trust in the fund and those delivering it. The UK Government should ensure that its methodology and criteria for allocating UKSPF funds are clear and transparent.
Government Response Summary
The government states it will publish further detail on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund later this year and confirm its funding profile at the next Spending Review, indicating that information will be provided but not explicitly committing to clear and transparent allocation methodology and criteria.
Scotland Office
View Details
7 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Para 28
We welcome UK Government support to help local authorities build their capacity to develop bids.
Recommendation
We welcome UK Government support to help local authorities build their capacity to develop bids. In its response to this Report, the UK Government should clarify 14 The UK Shared Prosperity Fund and Scotland how much funding has been given … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government clarifies that Scottish local authorities will receive £125,000 for Levelling Up Fund bids and £20,000 for UK Community Renewal Fund bids in priority places, but details on up to £14 million in specific UK Shared Prosperity Fund capacity funding will be released later this year.
Scotland Office
View Details
8 Recommendation Not Addressed
Para 32
The UK Government should prioritise academic research funding when allocating resources under the UKSPF.
Recommendation
The UK Government should prioritise academic research funding when allocating resources under the UKSPF. The UK Government should collaborate with the Scottish Government, to ensure that regions where structural funding for universities has brought significant regional benefits, are not disproportionally … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response outlines the general purpose of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, but does not address the specific recommendations regarding prioritising academic research funding or collaborating with the Scottish Government to prevent universities from being disproportionately disadvantaged.
Scotland Office
View Details
9 Recommendation Deferred
We recommend that the UK Government evaluates the progress of the UKSPF after one year...
Recommendation
We recommend that the UK Government evaluates the progress of the UKSPF after one year of operation and publishes a report, to ensure that funding is delivering the levelling up agenda by being allocated to the areas and sectors of … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states evaluation will be central to the UK Shared Prosperity Fund but defers providing further details on how and when this will happen.
Scotland Office
View Details