Third Report - Rollout and safety of smart motorways

Select Committee
Transport Committee HC 26 2 November 2021
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 11 items (7 recs)
Government Response (AI assessment · 11 of 11 classified)
Government response
Rollout and safety of smart motorways: Government Response to the Committee's Third Report · published 12 Jan 2022

Recommendations & Conclusions

11 results
1 Conclusion Deferred
Para 15
The design of our motorways and strategic roads necessarily entails balancing competing priorities.
Conclusion
The design of our motorways and strategic roads necessarily entails balancing competing priorities. However, successive Administrations, together with the Department and National Highways’ predecessor, Highways England, underestimated the scale of safety measures needed effectively and reliably to mitigate the risks … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government committed to further investigating the benefits of a health and safety assessment by the ORR and establishing an expert panel to review regulatory responsibilities and assess costs, benefits, and risks of additional ORR assessment, with recommendations later in the year.
Department for Transport
View Details
2 Conclusion Accepted
Para 16
We welcome the Department’s acceleration of safety improvements to all-lane running motorways and acknowledge that...
Conclusion
We welcome the Department’s acceleration of safety improvements to all-lane running motorways and acknowledge that the current Secretary of State for Transport and Minister for Roads have, upon their appointment, taken steps to address safety and delivery failures on all-lane … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it agrees with the recommendation and will immediately pause the rollout of All-Lane Running (ALR) smart motorway schemes yet to commence construction. This pause will remain until five years of safety data is available for ALR motorways introduced before 2020.
Department for Transport
View Details
3 Recommendation Accepted in Part
The design of our motorways and major roads can currently be altered without any independent...
Recommendation
The design of our motorways and major roads can currently be altered without any independent assurance on safety by a regulatory body, which is a systemic weakness. The Department should make the introduction of changes to the design and operation … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees in principle with the recommendation but primarily responds by detailing a £390m commitment to retrofit over 150 additional Emergency Areas (EAs) on all-lane running motorways by 2025. It does not commit to making all changes to road design and operation dependent on a formal health and safety assessment by the ORR.
Department for Transport
View Details
4 Recommendation Not Addressed
Para 24
The available data on the safety of all-lane running motorways are limited and volatile.
Recommendation
The available data on the safety of all-lane running motorways are limited and volatile. There are only five-years of safety data available for 29 miles of all-lane running motorways. The Department and National Highways should pause the rollout of all-lane … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it agrees with the recommendation but does not commit to pausing the rollout of all-lane running motorways. Instead, its response focuses on assessing the effectiveness and operation of Stopped Vehicle Detection (SVD) technology and other safety measures, with an initial report expected later this year.
Department for Transport
View Details
5 Conclusion Deferred
We welcome the steps that the Department is taking through the action plan to rebuild...
Conclusion
We welcome the steps that the Department is taking through the action plan to rebuild trust in smart motorways and to make them safer. However, we are concerned a) that emergency refuge areas will remain too far part on existing … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agreed in principle with the Committee's concerns but deferred action, stating that National Highways is researching the feasibility of emergency corridor rules. Initial research is due in early 2022, followed by further assessments and consultation by late 2022.
Department for Transport
View Details
6 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Para 29
The Department and National Highways should: a) retrofit emergency refuge areas to existing all-lane running...
Recommendation
The Department and National Highways should: a) retrofit emergency refuge areas to existing all-lane running motorways to make them a maximum of 1,500 metres apart, decreasing to every 1,000 metres where physically possible; b) commission the Office of Rail and … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to commission the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) to evaluate the success of the Action Plan in reducing live lane stops and breakdowns, with annual reports starting later this year. However, the response does not address retrofitting emergency refuge areas or inserting the emergency corridor manoeuvre into the Highway Code.
Department for Transport
View Details
7 Recommendation Accepted in Part
While we welcome the action plan, it is not clear whether the interventions that the...
Recommendation
While we welcome the action plan, it is not clear whether the interventions that the Government and National Highways are rolling out will effectively mitigate the specific safety risks associated with the removal of the hard shoulder. Beginning in September … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agreed with the recommendation to evaluate the action plan. It highlighted existing Post Opening Project Evaluation (POPE) reports by National Highways and committed to continuing work with the ORR to improve data and insights, and with Transport Focus on safety perception research.
Department for Transport
View Details
8 Recommendation Accepted
The Government and National Highways should pause the rollout of all-lane running motorways to collect...
Recommendation
The Government and National Highways should pause the rollout of all-lane running motorways to collect more data, to upgrade and then evaluate the safety of existing all-lane running schemes and to consider alternative options for enhancing capacity on the Strategic … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and will pause the conversion of seven Dynamic Hard Shoulder schemes to All-Lane Running motorways until the next Road Investment Strategy. They will consider alternative operating approaches, continue data collection on safety performance, and install further safety measures on existing DHS motorways.
Department for Transport
View Details
9 Recommendation Deferred
Para 44
Dynamic hard shoulder motorways apparently confuse drivers, because the hard shoulder is used unpredictably to...
Recommendation
Dynamic hard shoulder motorways apparently confuse drivers, because the hard shoulder is used unpredictably to tackle congestion. A more consistent approach, where the hard shoulder is used at known times, could clarify the situation for drivers without physically removing the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and commits to revisiting the case for controlled motorways compared to all-lane running motorways. An initial report comparing business cases will be published later this year, with updates as further data becomes available.
Department for Transport
View Details
10 Recommendation Accepted
Para 45
Controlled motorways, which retain the hard shoulder and have technology to regulate traffic, have the...
Recommendation
Controlled motorways, which retain the hard shoulder and have technology to regulate traffic, have the lowest casualty rates of all types of motorway on the Strategic Road Network. The Department and National Highways should revisit the case for controlled motorways. … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and will revisit the case for controlled motorways, comparing their business case with that of all-lane running motorways. An initial report on this comparison will be published later this year, with updates over the next few years.
Department for Transport
View Details
11 Conclusion Acknowledged
Examining the available evidence base, we are not convinced that reinstating the hard shoulder on...
Conclusion
Examining the available evidence base, we are not convinced that reinstating the hard shoulder on all all-lane running motorways will improve safety. The evidence suggests that doing so could put more drivers and passengers at risk of death and serious … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the committee's conclusion, reiterating that while the hard shoulder offers relative safety, it is not a safe place to stop, and that the government is right to focus on upgrading the safety of all-lane running motorways.
Department for Transport
View Details