20
Rejected
We are concerned that it is not cost effective for local authorities to operate their...
Recommendation
We are concerned that it is not cost effective for local authorities to operate their own alternative welfare system, and that support for families is inconsistent across the UK. We recommend that the Government carry out an analysis of whether it would be more cost effective for families with NRPF to have earlier access to the welfare system, and, if so, bring forward proposals along these lines. One option could be to enable local authorities to apply on behalf of families with NRPF for a change of conditions.
Government Response Summary
The Home Office does not plan to carry out a cost-benefit analysis on NRPF because it would not be feasible to do so meaningfully due to practicalities around estimating the total population subject to NRPF present in the UK at any one time.
Paragraph Reference
71
Government Response
Rejected
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
The Home Office does not plan to carry out a cost-benefit analysis on NRPF. It would not be feasible to do so meaningfully, not least for the reasons that we have alluded to previously (i.e. practicalities around estimating the total population subject to NRPF present in the UK at any one time in particular, as needed for any cost and benefits analysis).
Source
Committee
Work and Pensions Committee
Report
Seventh Report - Children in poverty: No recourse to public funds
14 Apr 2022
HC 603
Addressee Bodies
Department for Work and Pensions
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.1 yrs
Report published
14 Apr 2022