Delays to the publication of audited accounts for local government bodies increases the risk of governance or financial issues being identified too late and hinders accountability for £100 billion of local government spending. There are ways in which auditors can sound the alarm on risks before their audits are completed, such as issuing a Public Interest Report as was issued in October 2020 for the London Borough of Croydon. However, the risk of significant financial or governance issues being detected too late certainly increases significantly where audits are delayed. With the same pool of auditors working across other sectors, including the NHS, the delays in local audit also risk spreading to other areas of public spending. Some central government departments and their arms-length bodies are continuing to experience knock-on impacts on accountability; for example, when there are delays to the assurances local auditors give on Local Government Pension Scheme accounts and figures supporting Whole of Government Accounts (WGA). As a result, the Department is open to exploring options that allow these central government audits to be concluded without relying on local auditor assurances. The FRC has committed to look at the wider local audit system to make sure actions to address the timeliness of auditing in one area do not affect another. 6 Timeliness of local auditor reporting Recommendation 2: The Department should, as part of its Treasury Minute response, explain what it is doing across the local audit sector to mitigate the impact of delays to the audited accounts of local government bodies on: • Accountability for public money spent by these organisations; • The accounts and audit of central government departments; and • Significant local audit issues being identified or reported late in the day.