12
Rejected
The Department and NHS England told us that data on patient-level activity from hospices, which...
Recommendation
The Department and NHS England told us that data on patient-level activity from hospices, which ICBs need in their role as commissioners, is not strong or robust enough, because hospices are only obliged to report activity data when they are funded through a contract.21 Professor Murtagh described how activity across the hospice sector is not understood well enough, and Hospice UK referenced the NAO report that showed the variability in reporting and catching activity data.22 NHS England informed us of their Faster Data Flows programme, but noted that rollout to independent hospices has only recently begun.23
Government Response Summary
The government explicitly disagrees with the committee's recommendation regarding the lack of robust patient-level data from hospices. Its response focuses instead on guidance for ICBs on population health delivery models and the development of new payment models, without addressing the specific data collection or Faster Data Flows concerns.
Government Response
Rejected
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
1.3 The government disagrees with the Committee’s recommendation: 1.4 Guidance on how ICBs can move towards population health delivery models and commissioning was also published alongside the Neighbourhood Health Framework on 17 March 2026. This states that NHS England will work with selected ICBs to develop new payment models to support neighbourhood services, including for those at end of life and will outline the co-designed payment approaches for all ICBs to consider shortly.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
73rd Report - Financial sustainability of adult hospices in England
18 Mar 2026
HC 1236
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
0.4 yrs
Report published
18 Mar 2026