5 Deferred

The non-coterminous reporting date of the Academies sector risks undermining comparability and weakening accountability for...

Recommendation
The non-coterminous reporting date of the Academies sector risks undermining comparability and weakening accountability for billions of pounds of public money. The WGA consolidation process faces persistent challenges due to the misalignment of financial reporting periods between academies and central government. Academies operate on a financial year ending 31 August, whereas the government’s year ends on 31 March, creating timing mismatches when incorporating academy accounts into the WGA. HM Treasury has previously noted that aligning the academies’ year end with the government’s would not be feasible, citing disruption to the sector’s operational cycle, costly system changes, and the administrative and audit burden of managing two-year ends, which it argues would not represent value for money. We believe this is a very weak argument and require more detailed assessment of the justifications to be convinced that the current approach remains the most appropriate. We note that unincorporated businesses were encouraged by HMRC to change their reporting dates – at considerable cost to each business. recommendation a. Treasury should outline in the Treasury Minute response the discussions held with the Department for Education to align financial year-end dates for academies. 6 b. Treasury should provide, alongside the Treasury Minute response, their value for money assessment of aligning the Academies sector.
Government Response Summary
The Treasury will interrogate the estimated costs and benefits and make a final consideration on VfM of alignment of the sector during the 2027 Spending Review when the audit and reporting landscape is clearer.
Government Response
Deferred
HM Government Deferred
The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. considerations of aligning the academies sector financial year-end with that of central government. An initial assessment indicates that alignment could present operational, financial and audit-related challenges. These include disruption to the link between academies’ financial reporting and the academic cycle, pressures on audit capacity, and potential impacts on the timeliness of DfE’s group accounts and the WGA. There may also be wider system and data implications for academy trusts and the department. DfE’s initial estimate (as of April 2026) is that over five years the cost of aligning the Academies sector could be £231 million, rising to £267 million if an audited sub-consolidation of the academy sector is required. £124 million of these costs would be one-off costs and incurred in year one. Alignment would be consistent with CLoS principles and avoid the need to deviate from the normal parliamentary and spending control framework, but these benefits are harder to quantify. The Treasury will interrogate the estimated costs and benefit s and make a final consideration on VfM of alignment of the sector during the 2027 Spending Review when the audit and reporting landscape is clearer.
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age 0.4 yrs
Report published 04 Mar 2026