16
Rejected
We questioned the Treasury on the use of the terms “aspiration” and “ambition” in relation...
Conclusion
We questioned the Treasury on the use of the terms “aspiration” and “ambition” in relation to local audit reform measures.29 The Treasury stated that it has implemented all relevant legislation within its remit, but that it cannot undertake the responsibilities of local government on their behalf.30 MHCLG also clarified that no formal sanctions exist, but that a three-stage, communication-focused approach is being used to encourage compliance among local authorities.31
Government Response Summary
The government stated it disagreed with the Committee’s conclusion regarding local audit, asserting it has a clear ambition to clear all backstop-related disclaimed opinions by the end of 2027-28 and has published a transition plan.
Government Response
Rejected
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
3.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Recommendation implemented 3.2 MHCLG has written separately to the Committee alongside the Treasury Minute with the information requested. 3.3 The government does not agree with the Committee’s conclusion in relation to local audit. The government has a clear ambition to clear all backstop-related disclaimed opinions by the end of 2027-28 and has published a transition plan setting out the arrangements for the reformed local audit system to help meet this objective.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
69th Report - Whole of Government Accounts 2023-24
04 Mar 2026
HC 1243
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
0.4 yrs
Report published
04 Mar 2026