9
The Digital Services Tax is intended to fill the gap until the implementation of Pillar...
Conclusion
The Digital Services Tax is intended to fill the gap until the implementation of Pillar One, albeit as a ‘second-best’ solution.23 Other countries have also introduced a Digital Services Tax, including France, Italy, Spain and Austria.24 HM Treasury told us that this reflected the widespread feeling among members of the OECD that taxing the digital economy was “unfinished business.”25 The administrative approaches—such as the scope and frequency of returns—vary, as do the rates charged, which increases compliance costs for businesses. Stakeholders told the NAO that they viewed the UK’s approach to implementing the tax favourably compared to some other countries.26 The United States, home to many of the businesses most affected, has opposed these taxes and threatened sanctions in response.27
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 27 June 2023. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Inquiry
Digital Services Tax
Report
Forty-Fourth Report - The Digital Services Tax
05 Apr 2023
HC 732
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
3.4 yrs
Report published
05 Apr 2023