17 Accepted

Government uses national and local modelling, together with two national networks of monitoring stations, to...

Conclusion
Government uses national and local modelling, together with two national networks of monitoring stations, to direct its actions on air quality, with directions to local authorities issued primarily on the basis of a national model identifying areas of likely exceedance of air quality targets.19 The national network consists of around 430 unique monitoring stations across two separate networks; the UK Urban NO2 Network, established in 2020, and the older Automatic Urban and Rural Network.20 The Joint Air Quality Unit estimates that the overall uncertainty in the national model is around +/- 30%, as it was in 2017, although it has found that the model results are now more closely aligned to the results produced by the more detailed local models.21 The NAO reported that some local authorities that had been directed to act by government are concerned that this could create an unfair situation whereby other local areas might be experiencing high levels of NO2 pollution but not be required to take action because the national model had not projected a breach of local concentration limits.22
Government Response Summary
The government stated it is satisfied with its existing modelling and monitoring networks, which meet compliance requirements, and continues to implement targeted improvements, acknowledging that local authorities can share evidence of potential breaches.
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government Accepted
The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Recommendation implemented. The government is satisfied that the best available evidence that meets the stringent requirements for assessing compliance with the annual mean Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) limit value under the Air Quality Standards Regulations (2010) (AQSR) has been used to identify areas in exceedance and bring them into the programme. An uncertainty of around +/-30% is not unusual for a model of this scale and complexity, and assessments have demonstrated that the national model meets the uncertainty requirements for assessing compliance under the AQSR. The government continues to work with external experts to identify and implement further targeted improvements to the national model to ensure it uses the best available evidence and reflects the impact of local measures. The government has also set up a new monitoring network which has greatly increased the number of locations where compliance with NO2 limits is assessed using measurements. This network is achieving lower levels of uncertainty (<15%) and has more than tripled the number of roadside measurements used in the NO2 compliance assessment. Since both modelled and measured values contain uncertainties, the government cannot definitively guarantee that all areas of exceedance have been identified. Where local authorities’ air quality monitoring identifies a potential NO2 breach, they can share this evidence with the Joint Air Quality Unit. Whether a locally identified breach should be tackled through the NO2 programme or through the Local Air Quality Management (LAQM) regime will depend on whether the monitoring data meets the specific siting and data quality requirements of the AQSR.
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age 3.8 yrs
Report published 26 Oct 2022