28
Acknowledged
The NAO reported that the circumstances in which government had to implement the traffic light...
Conclusion
The NAO reported that the circumstances in which government had to implement the traffic light system had often been a crisis response requiring government to move at pace.49 The Cabinet Office explained that the system was a response to the then concern about vaccine-evading variants of COVID-19. We observed that COVID-19 had been in the UK for a year by the time most of the travel measures were introduced from February 2021 onwards. Given this, we asked why the MQS had been set up hurriedly. DHSC recognised that there had been a short amount of time between the decision to set up the system and it being launched. It explained that a range of potential measures and controls at the border had been discussed in advance, and MQS was announced in January 2021 and had to go live by 15 February 2021.50 We asked why there had been a 48-hour delay in re-opening quarantine hotels when government decided that they were needed during the omicron wave in late 2021, during which time potentially infectious people from red-list countries self-isolated at home. DHSC told us that 48 hours was the best it could achieve, as it took longer to set up a quarantine hotel than a standard hotel as the MQS had additional requirements such as security guards. We asked whether DHSC could reopen the quarantine hotels very quickly if needed again. DHSC explained that, unlike during the omicron wave, it no longer had specific hotels available as contingency and quarantine people in hotels was “an extreme measure … something you would do only in real need”. It told us that it was confident, that if it did find itself in similar circumstances, the playbook of options that it had developed would serve it well, but accepted that setting up quarantine hotels would definitely take it longer than 48 hours.51
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, stating that lessons learned inform contingency planning, COVID-19 surveillance is retained, and future responses will focus on pharmaceutical interventions, while wider pandemic scenarios are being developed.
Government Response
Acknowledged
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
1.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. 1.2 Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, departments considered the efficacy of policies implemented, and those lessons learned continue to inform contingency planning and are considered across government, including looking ahead to future public health threats. 1.3 The government retained COVID-19 surveillance such as the Office for National Statistics survey, REACT and Vivaldi to enable early-warning mechanisms and be able to react quickly to potential future Variants of Concern (VoC). The overarching contingency strategy was set out to the House of Commons in March 2022, with the core of the strategy being the use of pharmaceutical interventions such as vaccines, rather than reintroducing restrictions. 1.4 Given the response to any VoC will be informed by the prevailing epidemiological conditions of the day, its intrinsic severity and the impact of pharmaceutical interventions, it is not possible to set out specific plans, but the Living with COVID-19 strategy set out the parameters of an initial response. Governance plans have also been developed with the UK Health Security Agency leading on health security threats such as COVID-19 alongside the Department of Health and Social Care, and the Cabinet Office supporting upstream planning through its resilience functions. In addition to COVID-19 preparations, the government is also due to publish an updated Biological Security Strategy later in 2022 and is developing a wider range of scenarios for future pandemic planning if needed, including respiratory (influenza and non-influenza), contact and vector-borne scenarios.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Sixteenth Report - Managing cross-border travel during the COVID-19 pandemic
26 Jul 2022
HC 29
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.0 yrs
Report published
26 Jul 2022