35
Through our work we often see a lack of openness and transparency about programme progress,...
Conclusion
Through our work we often see a lack of openness and transparency about programme progress, performance and decision-making. In January 2021, we concluded it was vital that Parliament’s own major project, the Restoration and Renewal Programme, was an exemplar of an open and transparent project which welcomes full scrutiny.93 84 HC1100 Q 116; Sponsor Body, Restoration and Renewal Programme: Essential Scheme: initial assessment of cost and schedule; and continued presence: impact study, DEP2022–0145, 23 February 2022 85 HC49 Q4 86 RRP0003 87 HC49 Q 38 88 HC1100 Qq 106, 108–109 89 HC1100 Q 132 90 Joint report from the House of Commons and House of Lords Commissions, 14 June 2022, pg 23 91 HC49 Qq 55–57 92 HC49 Q 59 93 Public Accounts Committee, Lessons from major projects and programmes, Thirty-Ninth Report, Session 2019– 21, HC 694, 29 January 2021 Restoration and Renewal of Parliament 19
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 2 September 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Tenth Report - Restoration and Renewal of Parliament
29 Jun 2022
HC 49
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.2 yrs
Report published
29 Jun 2022