16
Accepted
We asked why, given the amount of uncertainty surrounding the costs, and concerns about the...
Conclusion
We asked why, given the amount of uncertainty surrounding the costs, and concerns about the adequacy of the Fund to cover this, the risks of decommissioning were being entirely borne by the taxpayer. The Department said that the £100 million agreed with EDFE was a meaningful financial incentive to manage, for example, the risks of defueling. It also argued that some of the issues were due to agreements made “decades and decades ago” and that it would structure these differently in future as part of the planning for new nuclear power stations to ensure that the risk falls much more strongly with the operator.27
Government Response Summary
The government refers to its response to recommendation 3, stating that the terms of the 2009 sale placed a disproportionate amount of risk on the taxpayer.
Government Response
Accepted
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
The department agrees that the terms of the 2009 sale of the nuclear stations agreed by the Department with EDFE placed a disproportionate amount of risk for meeting future decommissioning costs on the taxpayer. Please see response to recommendation 3.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Third Report - The future of the Advanced Gas-cooled Reactors
20 May 2022
HC 118
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.0 yrs
Report published
20 May 2022