8
The NAO found that, before the pandemic, departments lacked an agreed understanding of risk tolerance,...
Conclusion
The NAO found that, before the pandemic, departments lacked an agreed understanding of risk tolerance, such as which consequences of a pandemic they deemed acceptable and which consequences they needed to mitigate. The Cabinet Office agreed that government reached a shared understanding of the objectives and priorities they 3 Qq 28, 55–60, 74, 80–83 4 C&AG’s Report, para. 3.14; Q 70. 5 C&AG’s Report, para. 4.2; HM Government, The Orange Book: Management of Risk – Principles and Concepts, February 2020 6 Qq 86–95 7 Government Finance Function, Good Practice Guide: Risk Reporting, August 2021; Risk Appetite Guidance Note, October 2020, revised August 2021; Risk Management Skills and Capabilities Framework, August 2021 8 HM Government, The Orange Book: Management of Risk – Principles and Concepts, February 2020 9 Qq 49, 84–85 Government preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons for government on risk 11 should focus on only at the start of a pandemic, following the establishment of its crisis response structures. Government officials told the NAO that a shared understanding of risk tolerance for many cross-government issues is still being developed.10 Communication of the main risks facing the UK
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 27 May 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Forty-Sixth Report Government preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons for government on risk
23 Mar 2022
HC 952
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.5 yrs
Report published
23 Mar 2022