16
Acknowledged
We therefore asked HM Treasury what it was doing to identify and address some of...
Recommendation
We therefore asked HM Treasury what it was doing to identify and address some of the issues raised by our and the NAO’s work examining the response to the pandemic, for example around the trade-offs between acting at speed and ensuring value-for- money.36 HM Treasury said that, although it had disagreed with our recommendation, it agreed that it should review major COVID-related spending decisions and “consider very carefully value for money”.37 It told us that it did not intend to carry out a full formal audit of all COVIDrelated expenditure and then reach a value-for-money judgement on all programmes. However, when we asked whether there was a process for assessing previous spending decisions and learning from them, it told us that ahead of new funding decisions, for example on NHS Test and Trace and the vaccines programme, it reviewed and learned lessons from departments’ previous spending.38
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and states the recommendation is implemented, referring to a March 2021 letter outlining general lessons and actions, but it does not detail a specific new process for identifying and addressing the trade-offs between speed and value for money as raised by the Committee.
Government Response
Acknowledged
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
4.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Recommendation implemented 4.2 The department wrote to the Committee on 31 March 2021 as part of the letter noted under 3.2 above, outlining lessons and actions that have been taken across public spending, finance and economic support schemes.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Thirty-Eighth Report - COVID-19 cost tracker update
23 Feb 2022
HC 640
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.4 yrs
Report published
23 Feb 2022