9
Despite the Cabinet Office’s stance that ALBs should be used only as a last resort,...
Recommendation
Despite the Cabinet Office’s stance that ALBs should be used only as a last resort, 38% of business cases submitted between 2016 and 2020 did not seriously consider a long-list of alternative delivery models. One quarter of business cases submitted in the same period did not contain a cost-benefit analysis of the chosen delivery model.15 Without complete information it is difficult for the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury to determine whether the proposed ALB is the most appropriate and effective way to deliver a policy objective. This in turn can lead to complicated accountability and governance arrangements, and a poor 8 Qq 38–39; C&AG’s report, para 3.25 9 C&AG’s Report, para 3.25 10 Qq 85- 86; C&AG’s report, para 3.20 11 Q 89; C&AG’s report, Figure 16 para 3.25 12 Q 47 13 C&AG’s report, paras 14. 2.3 14 Qq 44–45 15 Qq 45–46 10 Government’s delivery through arm’s-length bodies delineation of roles and responsibilities between the ALB and its sponsor department. The Cabinet Office told us that it was considering a more stringent approach to its assessment of departmental business cases.16 Cabinet Office support
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 14 December 2021. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Eighteenth Report - Government’s delivery through arm’s-length bodies
24 Sep 2021
HC 181
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
5.0 yrs
Report published
24 Sep 2021