22
Accepted
The condensed timetable for introducing the schemes meant that a lot of the standard documentation...
Recommendation
The condensed timetable for introducing the schemes meant that a lot of the standard documentation that would accompany such a major policy initiative—business cases, options appraisal and detailed cost-benefit analysis—wasn’t undertaken back in the spring.57 HM Treasury asserted that the potential economic costs and human cost of large-scale unemployment if the schemes had not been introduced meant that they were necessary even if it was not possible to quantify this.58 We were nonetheless concerned that while there was a speedy intervention with the schemes initially it was important not to lose sight of the need to undertake value for money calculations on behalf of the taxpayer.59 54 Q 16 55 Qq 18–21 56 Q 36 57 C&AG’s Report, para 1.8 58 Q 36 59 Q 39 Covid-19: Support for jobs 17
Government Response Summary
The government accepts the recommendation and states it has been implemented, confirming the Permanent Secretary to the Treasury wrote to the committee in January 2021 to outline the value for money assessment approach for the extended schemes. It details ongoing VFM evaluations for both CJRS and SEISS.
Government Response
Accepted
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
7.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Recommendation implemented 7.2 As requested by the Committee, the Permanent Secretary to the Treasury wrote to the committee on 20 January 2021 outlining how HM Treasury will assess value for money (VFM) for the extended schemes. HM Treasury considered the VFM of the schemes and subsequent changes at key stages of the policy making process. Ensuring VFM, protecting employment and supporting businesses were central to the decision-making for the CJRS and SEISS extensions. Extending the CJRS was a critical response to the economic conditions, and the Office of Budget Responsibility have estimated that this extension will support up to 6 million jobs in November 2020 declining thereafter. The OBR have also estimated that unemployment would have been higher in the second quarter of 2021 in the absence of the CJRS and other measures. 7.3 The revised cost of the CJRS and SEISS will be set out at the next Budget in March 2021. Given the economic and fiscal significance of the CJRS, HM Treasury and HMRC are undertaking an evaluation of the schemes. 7.4 In December 2020, the departments published the Evaluation Plan for the CJRS, which sets out their approach to evaluating the CJRS. 7.5 The CJRS evaluation will draw on the Magenta Book and Green Book. The departments also plan to evaluate the SEISS, although self-assessment data will not be available until at least 2022.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Inquiry
COVID-19: Support for jobs
Report
Thirty-fourth Report - Covid-19: Support for jobs
20 Dec 2020
HC 920
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
5.6 yrs
Report published
20 Dec 2020