Fortieth Report - Achieving government’s long-term environmental goals

Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee HC 927 3 February 2021
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 22 items (7 recs)
Government Response (AI assessment · 22 of 22 classified)
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fortieth report from Session 2019-21 · published 3 Sep 2021

Recommendations & Conclusions

22 results
2 Recommendation Not Addressed
The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs has the policy responsibility for the environment,...
Recommendation
The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs has the policy responsibility for the environment, but not the clout to hold other departments to account or manage trade-offs between policy areas. In July 2018, the Environmental Audit Committee recommended that … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response refers to a PAC conclusion about HM Revenue & Customs' Net Cash Requirement breach, completely failing to address the recommendation regarding reviewing the effectiveness of the cross-government environment board.
HM Treasury
View Details
3 Recommendation Not Addressed
Government still does not have a good grip of the total costs required to deliver...
Recommendation
Government still does not have a good grip of the total costs required to deliver its environmental goals and funding so far has been piecemeal. The Department received an additional £1 billion in funding for 2020–21 in the Spending Review … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response refers to a PAC conclusion about the Home Office's Net Cash Requirement breach, completely failing to address the recommendation regarding reviewing and outlining total costs for environmental goals.
HM Treasury
View Details
4 Recommendation Not Addressed
Skills gaps in departments and arm’s length bodies jeopardise government’s capacity to deliver on its...
Recommendation
Skills gaps in departments and arm’s length bodies jeopardise government’s capacity to deliver on its environmental ambitions. Progress towards environmental goals requires skills across government, and particularly in arm’s length bodies who have key responsibility for delivery of the goals. … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response does not address the recommendation regarding skills gaps but instead states that HM Treasury breached its Capital Annually Managed Expenditure total by £32 million.
HM Treasury
View Details
5 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Environmental impacts are still not being taken into account in spending decisions.
Recommendation
Environmental impacts are still not being taken into account in spending decisions. For the last Spending Review, the Treasury asked departments to set out how their proposals would contribute towards the UK’s statutory carbon targets, and to explain their impact … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation but states it is reviewing past guidance and considering what additional information should be published following the next spending review, rather than explicitly committing to publish the specific analysis requested.
HM Treasury
View Details
6 Recommendation Accepted
We are concerned that the new Office for Environmental Protection will inherit a backlog of...
Recommendation
We are concerned that the new Office for Environmental Protection will inherit a backlog of cases, and remain to be convinced that it will be sufficiently independent. It will take some months for the Office for Environmental Protection and its … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted both parts of the recommendation, confirming the Permanent Secretary had written to the committee about the interim OEP setup and that the OEP will have a mandate to report directly to Parliament.
HM Treasury
View Details
1 Conclusion Not Addressed
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...
Conclusion
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department for the Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (the Department), HM Treasury, Natural England and the Environment Agency about achieving government’s long-term environmental … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response does not address the committee's procedural conclusion about taking evidence but instead states that the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy breached its Resource Annually Managed Expenditure total by £4.9 billion.
HM Treasury
View Details
7 Conclusion Accepted
Government has not yet met European Union concentration limits for nitrogen dioxide that had an...
Conclusion
Government has not yet met European Union concentration limits for nitrogen dioxide that had an original compliance deadline of 2010, and the UK was one of six member states referred to the European Court in May 2018 over non-compliance.15 In … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observations on missed targets and commits to laying new long-term environmental targets by October 2022, with interim targets in a revised Environment Plan by January 2023. It also aims to finalise all 66 outcome indicators by 2024.
HM Treasury
View Details
8 Conclusion Not Addressed
To deliver government’s ambitions as set out in the 25 Year Environment Plan, the Department...
Conclusion
To deliver government’s ambitions as set out in the 25 Year Environment Plan, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (the Department) has lead responsibility for all environmental policy areas apart from climate change mitigation, for which the Department … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response reiterates the origins of the 25 Year Environment Plan and Defra's lead role, noting other government parts also play important roles, without addressing the broader cross-government accountability implied by the committee's reference.
HM Treasury
View Details
9 Conclusion Accepted
While the Plan sets out a whole-of-government commitment to improve the environment within a generation,...
Conclusion
While the Plan sets out a whole-of-government commitment to improve the environment within a generation, the existing arrangements for joint working between departments on environmental issues are patchy, with no clear indications of senior ownership of the Plan outside the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observations and confirms it has already established a new Cross-Government 25 Year Environment Plan Board. It commits to providing an initial assessment of the board's effectiveness by June 2021 and a fuller assessment by July 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
10 Conclusion Not Addressed
We asked the Department whether it has sufficient clout to manage trade-offs where there is...
Conclusion
We asked the Department whether it has sufficient clout to manage trade-offs where there is competition between departments; and how it plans to bring to bear its responsibility for leading government to deliver on the Plan.25 The Department expects that … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response is truncated and merely repeats a portion of the original committee text, failing to provide any new information or address the underlying concern about managing cross-departmental trade-offs.
HM Treasury
View Details
11 Conclusion Not Addressed
The Department received an additional £1 billion in funding for 2020–21 in the Spending Review,...
Conclusion
The Department received an additional £1 billion in funding for 2020–21 in the Spending Review, however it confirmed that this includes a previously announced increase in flood defence spending.29 It noted that the increase will allow for significant investment in … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation on funding but instead of providing the requested breakdown of the £1 billion, it commits to determining and publishing the costs for meeting new legally binding targets with HM Treasury by October 2022, to align with the next Environmental Improvement Plan by January 2023.
HM Treasury
View Details
12 Conclusion Deferred
The Environment Agency and Natural England have a key role to play in delivering government’s...
Conclusion
The Environment Agency and Natural England have a key role to play in delivering government’s environmental goals. Natural England confirmed that it has had its budget reduced by almost half in recent years which has affected its ability to meet … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation on funding challenges but defers action by stating that costs for meeting new legally binding targets will be determined with HM Treasury and published by October 2022, to align with the next Environmental Improvement Plan by January 2023.
HM Treasury
View Details
13 Recommendation Accepted
There is no single point of responsibility within government for monitoring overall spend on environmental...
Recommendation
There is no single point of responsibility within government for monitoring overall spend on environmental goals, and neither the Department nor the Treasury yet have a good understanding of the long-term costs involved in delivering the goals. Moreover, while the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted the recommendation, committing to establish a robust framework through the Environment Bill for developing the economic case for environmental targets, and will publish determined costs by October 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
14 Recommendation Accepted
Government needs to ensure that organisations have access to the skills and resources they require...
Recommendation
Government needs to ensure that organisations have access to the skills and resources they require to play their part in delivering environmental goals.35 The Department told us that both scientific and project management skills are required to make progress, particularly … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to the recommendation, stating it is working to understand and develop required skills and will develop a wider skills and capability plan to ensure organisations have the necessary expertise and resources for environmental goals.
HM Treasury
View Details
15 Conclusion Acknowledged
We asked about the diversity of the workforce to deliver these environmental goals, and the...
Conclusion
We asked about the diversity of the workforce to deliver these environmental goals, and the Environment Agency noted the steps it has taken to improve diversity, for example going into technical institutes where there may be a higher proportion of … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the importance of skills and capability for environmental outcomes, describing ongoing work within Defra group agencies and a commitment to develop a wider skills and capability plan.
HM Treasury
View Details
16 Conclusion Acknowledged
We asked the Department what its role is in relation to creating and retaining ‘green’...
Conclusion
We asked the Department what its role is in relation to creating and retaining ‘green’ jobs. It told us that the Green Recovery Challenge Fund, established in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and initially funded to £40 million, has been … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the need to understand and develop skills for environmental outcomes, describing ongoing work within Defra group agencies and committing to develop a wider skills and capability plan, without directly addressing green job creation.
HM Treasury
View Details
17 Conclusion Accepted
We asked the Treasury what it was doing to ensure departments factor the environment into...
Conclusion
We asked the Treasury what it was doing to ensure departments factor the environment into their spending bids. Treasury told us that for the 2020 Spending Review it asked departments for an assessment of the contribution of their proposals towards … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees, outlining that HM Treasury requires departments to assess environmental impacts during spending reviews via the Green Book, continuously updates guidance, and is reviewing learning from the 2020 Spending Review to consider publishing additional information.
HM Treasury
View Details
18 Conclusion Accepted
Treasury told us that the extent to which departments appraise the environmental impact of what...
Conclusion
Treasury told us that the extent to which departments appraise the environmental impact of what they are doing is variable, a good example being the Department for Transport which has worked closely with Defra and the Treasury on its programme … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and outlines existing processes such as the Green Book for assessing environmental impacts, noting continuous improvements and an ongoing review of the environmental discount rate, while considering publishing additional information after the next spending review.
HM Treasury
View Details
19 Conclusion Accepted
Treasury conceded that there is a long way to go before accounting for the environment...
Conclusion
Treasury conceded that there is a long way to go before accounting for the environment is fully embedded within the spending review process and is on a level pegging with carbon emissions where there is a statutory budget-setting process. It … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to integrate environmental considerations further into spending reviews by continuously improving the Green Book, conducting a review of the environmental discount rate, and considering additional publication of information on environmental impacts after the next spending review.
HM Treasury
View Details
20 Conclusion Accepted
As the Office for Environmental Protection is yet to be established under the provisions of...
Conclusion
As the Office for Environmental Protection is yet to be established under the provisions of the Environment Bill, we asked the Department about interim arrangements for holding public bodies to account on environmental law. The Department told us that a … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and will set up the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) in interim form from July 2021, led by the Chair-designate and other directors, to begin functions like receiving complaints and developing strategy before the Environment Bill's Royal Assent.
HM Treasury
View Details
21 Conclusion Accepted
The interim secretariat will be able to make assessments around reported breaches of environmental law...
Conclusion
The interim secretariat will be able to make assessments around reported breaches of environmental law by public bodies. It will then be up to the Office to catch up on these 45 Q 20 46 HM Treasury, The Green Book: … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees, stating it is setting up the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) in interim form from July 2021, outlining its functions and ensuring it can use its full powers upon Royal Assent.
HM Treasury
View Details
22 Conclusion Accepted
In discussing the reporting obligations of the Office, the Department explained that it will report...
Conclusion
In discussing the reporting obligations of the Office, the Department explained that it will report to Ministers, who can then be held to account by Parliament. We noted that this is in contrast to the Climate Change Committee, which must … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government confirms the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) will be operationally independent, reporting to Parliament on its functions and findings, despite being accountable to Ministers, and is establishing the OEP in interim form from July 2021.
HM Treasury
View Details