24
Accepted
Given the apparent low level of strategic exports and sanctions prosecutions, especially in recent years,...
Conclusion
Given the apparent low level of strategic exports and sanctions prosecutions, especially in recent years, we are disappointed that when we asked if the Government had any plans to review the effectiveness of the relevant legislation, they simply stated that enforcement was a matter for HMRC. HMRC are responsible for enforcing the legislation put forward by the Government and passed by Parliament. It is not HMRC’s role to assess the effectiveness of legislation. This is a matter for the Government and if changes are required it is for Parliament to legislate for them.
Government Response Summary
The government states that export control legislation is already kept under regular review to ensure effectiveness and that ECJU will continue to work closely with HMRC on enforcement, implying no new action is needed despite the committee's concerns.
Paragraph Reference
74
Government Response
Accepted
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
Export Control legislation is kept under regular review to ensure it operates effectively and that enforcement measures and penalties continue to apply properly. HMRC’s operational experience is a key consideration in assessing the effectiveness of the legislation and ECJU will continue to work closely with them to ensure that the controls can be effectively enforced.
Source
Committee
Committees on Arms Export Controls
Inquiry
UK arms exports in 2019
Report
First Joint Report - Developments in UK Strategic Export Controls
28 Oct 2022
HC 282
Timeline
Recommendation age
3.6 yrs
Report published
28 Oct 2022