Tribunal found no wrongdoing and cleared all those accused of improper disclosure. Made no formal recommendations.
Legacy & Impact
The Bank Rate Tribunal of 1957-58 investigated allegations that advance information about the Bank of England's decision to raise Bank Rate from 5% to 7% on 19 September 1957 had been improperly disclosed, enabling certain individuals to profit. Established under the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921 and chaired by Lord Justice Parker, the tribunal examined whether ministers, civil servants, or City figures had exploited inside knowledge for personal gain. The tribunal's report, published on 21 January 1958, found no evidence of improper disclosure and exonerated all those under suspicion. The inquiry produced no recommendations and led to no immediate legislative or regulatory changes. The tribunal's significance lies primarily in its use of the 1921 Act procedures to investigate allegations of misconduct at the intersection of politics and finance. While the case contributed to public discourse about insider trading and market regulation, statutory controls on insider dealing were not introduced until the Company Securities (Insider Dealing) Act 1985, nearly three decades later. The Bank Rate Tribunal remains notable as an early post-war example of a formal inquiry into alleged financial impropriety involving government officials, though its direct impact on policy or institutional reform was minimal.
Lasting Reforms
None identified - the tribunal made no recommendations and produced no direct legislative or structural reforms
Unfinished Business
None identified - the tribunal made no recommendations
Summary written by the tracker with AI assistance, 26 March 2026. Not part of the inquiry record; indicative, not authoritative.
Total reported cost
£7,700
Hansard ministerial answer, 28 January 1958 (approximate total)
Source and qualifications
Accounting period: 14 Nov 1957 to 28 Jan 1958.
Minister reported total tribunal cost as about GBP7,700. Approximate nominal pounds; no inflation adjustment or detailed cost breakdown supplied. Period fields identify establishment and the answer date as a reporting checkpoint, not an annual accounts period. The 4 February 1958 answer separately says publication price was calculated to recover printing and selling expenses; it does not establish actual revenues recovered.
Hansard ministerial answer, 28 January 1958 (approximate total)
Breakdown and notes