Previous Next
Jump to 5 Recommendations

Litvinenko Inquiry

Completed
Chair Sir Robert Owen Judge / Judiciary
Established 27 Jan 2015
Final Report 21 Jan 2016
Commissioned by Home Office

Inquiry into the death of Alexander Litvinenko who was poisoned with polonium-210 in London in 2006.

Evidence & Impact
The Litvinenko Inquiry examined the death of Alexander Litvinenko, a former Russian intelligence officer who died in London in November 2006 from polonium-210 poisoning. Sir Robert Owen's inquiry, which reported in January 2016, made five recommendations to the government.

The government accepted all five recommendations. According to the Home Secretary's statement to Parliament on 21 January 2016, immediate actions were taken on several fronts. Treasury Ministers agreed to impose asset freezes on the two main suspects, Andrei Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun. The Metropolitan Police had already secured Interpol notices and European Arrest Warrants for their arrest should they travel outside Russia. The government made senior-level diplomatic representations to Moscow, summoning the Russian Ambassador to express 'profound displeasure at Russia's failure to co-operate.' The Home Secretary also wrote to international partners including the EU, NATO and Five Eyes nations about the inquiry's findings.

One recommendation remains classified, with the Home Secretary stating she could not reveal its details but would respond to the Inquiry Chair 'in due course.' No public evidence exists regarding this recommendation's content or any subsequent action.

The Home Secretary wrote to the Director of Public Prosecutions requesting consideration of further action on extradition and freezing criminal assets. While this review was completed, extradition remains impossible as Russia continues to refuse cooperation.

The most recent publicly available evidence dates from September 2021, when the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russia was responsible for Litvinenko's death and ordered damages of €100,000 to be paid to his widow. The sanctions and arrest warrants remain in place, though the suspects remain in Russia beyond the reach of UK law enforcement.

The inquiry's recommendations focused primarily on diplomatic and law enforcement responses rather than systemic reforms. While the government acted on the recommendations within its power, the fundamental obstacle of Russian non-cooperation means the suspects remain at large.
Reforms Attributed to This Inquiry
- Asset freezes imposed on Andrei Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun through Treasury action (January 2016)
- Interpol Red Notices and European Arrest Warrants issued for Lugovoy and Kovtun
- Diplomatic representations made to Russian government at senior level, with Russian Ambassador summoned to Foreign Office
- European Court of Human Rights ruling (September 2021) finding Russia responsible for Litvinenko's death and ordering €100,000 damages
Unfinished Business
- The classified recommendation (LIT-1) - no public evidence available regarding its content or any action taken
- Extradition of suspects - remains impossible due to continued Russian non-cooperation despite arrest warrants
Generated 18 Mar 2026 using claude-opus-4. Assessment is indicative, not authoritative.
11 months Duration
£2.5m Total Cost
Government Response
Accepted 5
Total Recommendations 5
Data last updated: 21 Sep 2021 · Source
Data verified: 30 Jan 2026 (Claude)
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

1 question since Apr 2016
Written Question Inquiries
Tulip Siddiq (Labour)
14 Apr 2016
All Activity (1)
Title Volume Publication Date Recs Links
The Litvinenko Inquiry: Report into the death of Alexander Litvinenko Final 21 Jan 2016 5
22 Jul 2014
Inquiry Announced
27 Jan 2015
Inquiry Established
21 Jan 2016
Final Report Published

Recommendations (5)

LIT-1
Accepted
Closed Recommendation
Recommendation

One recommendation contained within the closed section of the report (classified).

Published evidence summary
According to Home Secretary Theresa May's statement on 21 January 2016, the government accepted this classified recommendation and would respond to the Inquiry Chair in due course, but its details could not be revealed publicly. According to the available evidence, no specific public evidence of actions taken in response to this classified recommendation has been identified since the Home Secretary's statement.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
LIT-2
Accepted
Asset Freezes on Suspects
Recommendation

Asset freezes should be implemented against the suspects Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun.

Published evidence summary
According to Home Secretary Theresa May's announcement on 21 January 2016, Treasury Ministers had agreed to implement asset freezes against Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun, stating that these freezes were put in place. According to progress updates from September 2021, these sanctions remain active.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
LIT-3
Accepted
Maintain Arrest Warrants
Recommendation

Interpol notices and European Arrest Warrants should remain in place for the suspects.

Published evidence summary
According to Home Secretary Theresa May's confirmation on 21 January 2016, Interpol notices and European Arrest Warrants were in place for Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun, and the Metropolitan Police investigation remained open. According to the available evidence, these arrest warrants continue to be in place as of September 2021.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
LIT-4
Accepted
Diplomatic Representations to Russia
Recommendation

Senior diplomatic representations should be made to Russia regarding its failure to cooperate with justice.

Published evidence summary
According to Home Secretary Theresa May's confirmation on 21 January 2016, senior diplomatic representations were being made to the Russian Government in Moscow, and the Russian Ambassador was summoned to express the UK's profound displeasure at Russia's failure to cooperate. According to the same statement, the Home Secretary also wrote to EU, NATO, and Five Eyes partners regarding the inquiry's findings; however, according to the available evidence, no further specific public evidence of diplomatic representations has been identified since 2016.
Foreign Office (Primary) Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (Primary)
View Details
LIT-5
Accepted
Review Further Legal Actions
Recommendation

The Director of Public Prosecutions should consider whether further action can be taken on extradition and asset freezing.

Published evidence summary
According to Home Secretary Theresa May's letter on 21 January 2016, she requested the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to consider further actions regarding extradition and freezing criminal assets. According to the available evidence, this review was completed, concluding that extradition remains impossible due to Russia's continued refusal to cooperate.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details