Reports & recommendations

23 recommendations, each with the government response on the record. Filter by government response or delivery status.

Recommendations (6)

DM-7
Noted

CPS guidance on disclosure for profit

Recommendation
It is recommended that the Crown Prosecution Service's additional guidance should be amended to include a requirement that the Prosecutor should consider whether the information was disclosed with a view to one or both parties securing future profit from the …
In brief (written by this site)

The Home Office stated in June 2023 that the Crown Prosecution Service had updated its guidance in February 2022, setting out a list of factors to consider when assessing a suspect's overall criminality and motivation, including confirmation that advantage "need not be financial but could include other forms of anticipated personal gain" (Home Office response, Jun 2023). The record holds no update since the Home Office's response of June 2023 (Home Office response, Jun 2023).

Home Office · 15 Jun 2023 Noted
Words of: Home Office, Government response to the report of the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (CP 857), presented to Parliament by the Home Secretary, 15 June 2023
2.4.8. The Panel recommended that the CPS issue additional guidance around disclosure of material likely to result in future profit. The CPS has updated its guidance and this was published on 16 February 2022. The guidance sets out a list of non-exhaustive factors to be considered when assessing the overall criminality of a suspect, including their motivation, and now includes confirmation that advantage need not be financial but could include other forms of anticipated personal gain.
Read full response to DM-7 (opens in a new tab)

Crown Prosecution Service · 16 Feb 2022 No response yet
No formal government response published. The CPS amended its guidance, ‘Media: Assessing the Public Interest in Cases Affecting the Media’, updated 16 February 2022, but has not stated that the amendment was made in response to this recommendation.
Read full response to DM-7 (opens in a new tab)
Crown Prosecution Service (Primary)
View details of DM-7
DM-11
Noted

IPCO inspections of informant policies

Recommendation
The Panel is concerned that the policies and procedures relating to the use of informants by law enforcement agencies still allow scope for corrupt practices, and it recommends that the Investigatory Powers Commissioner takes this into consideration during inspections.
In brief (written by this site)

The Panel recommended that informant inspections take corruption risks into consideration. In June 2023, the Home Office stated that the Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office independently oversees these powers and conducts annual inspections to ensure compliance by law enforcement agencies (Home Office response, Jun 2023). The department explained that inspectors conduct interviews with handler and controller staff and scrutinise authorisation paperwork to ensure individual agencies mitigate risks (Home Office response, Jun 2023). It noted that handling risks associated with covert human intelligence sources is a key focus, though corrupt practices were not mentioned (Home Office response, Jun 2023).

Home Office · 15 Jun 2023 Noted
Words of: Home Office, Government response to the report of the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (CP 857), presented to Parliament by the Home Secretary, 15 June 2023
2.1.8. The Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (IPCO) independently oversees the use of these powers and conducts annual inspections to ensure compliance by law enforcement agencies. Experienced inspectors will also carry out further ad hoc inspections as required, should particular concerns arise, and overall findings are reported publicly in IPCO’s Annual Report. Handling the risks associated with the use of CHIS is a key focus for IPCO. Inspections include interviews with those in handler and controller roles and detailed scrutiny of the paperwork around the authorisation and management of CHIS, to ensure that risks are properly understood and mitigated by individual …
Read full response to DM-11 (opens in a new tab)
Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office (Primary)
View details of DM-11
DM-13
Noted

HMICFRS review of whistleblower protections

Recommendation
It is recommended that Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services conduct a thematic investigation of the operation of the practices and procedures introduced following the adoption of the Code of Ethics in 2014 to determine whether …
In brief (written by this site)

The Panel recommended a thematic investigation into protections for police whistleblowers. In June 2023, the Home Office reported that HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) had inspected corruption within the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and published findings in March 2022, though whistleblower protections were not mentioned (Home Office response, Jun 2023). The department noted that Baroness Casey's review of the force in March 2023 found that the inspectorate's recommendations were repeatedly not acted upon (Home Office response, Jun 2023). It also recorded that while the force accepted all of those recommendations, it had not met all of them by the March 2023 deadline (Home Office response, Jun 2023).

Home Office · 15 Jun 2023 Noted
Words of: Home Office, Government response to the report of the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (CP 857), presented to Parliament by the Home Secretary, 15 June 2023
2.2.3. The then Home Secretary acted immediately to concerns raised in the Panel’s report by commissioning HMICFRS to undertake a thematic inspection into corruption within the MPS. It published its findings on 22 March 2022. The report stated that the force’s procedures for rooting out corrupt officers and staff were ‘fundamentally flawed’ and ‘not fit for purpose’. The MPS set up a Counter Corruption Learning Group in April 2022 to provide oversight in responding to HMICFRS’s recommendations. The deadline for these recommendations was 31 March 2023. The MPS have provided the Home Secretary an update to demonstrate that all recommendations …
Read full response to DM-13 (opens in a new tab)
HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (Primary)
View details of DM-13
DM-16
Noted

Duty to cooperate with independent scrutiny bodies

Recommendation

In the interest of transparency and public accountability, all public institutions should be under a duty to cooperate fully with independent scrutiny bodies created by Government, such as the Panel.

In brief (written by this site)

The Panel recommended placing all public institutions under a duty to cooperate with independent scrutiny bodies. In June 2023, the Home Office stated that it introduced a statutory duty of cooperation for serving police officers in February 2020, alongside measures for former officers, but it did not mention other public institutions (Home Office response, Jun 2023). In March 2022, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services found that a non-statutory inquiry could not demand access to material and systems in the same way (HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services, Mar 2022). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of June 2023 (Home Office response, Jun 2023).

Home Office · 15 Jun 2023 Noted
Words of: Home Office, Government response to the report of the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (CP 857), presented to Parliament by the Home Secretary, 15 June 2023
2.3.3. The Home Office introduced a statutory duty of cooperation in February 2020 for serving police officers as part of wider integrity reforms. Police officers now have a responsibility to give appropriate cooperation during investigations, inquiries and formal proceedings, participating openly and professionally in line with the expectations of a police officer when identified as a witness. A failure to cooperate is a breach of the statutory standards of professional behaviour, by which all officers must abide, and could therefore result in disciplinary sanctions. Since December 2017, provisions are in place for proceedings to be brought against former officers to …
Read full response to DM-16 (opens in a new tab)
Home Office (Primary)
View details of DM-16
DM-21
Noted

Review archiving processes for historic material

Recommendation
In order to avoid most of the delays and difficulties inherent in this case, and in so many other unsolved cases, there is a need for a review of the processes for archiving historic material with a view to creating …
In brief (written by this site)

In June 2023, the Home Office stated that a new Code of Practice, together with guidance on archiving records in the public interest, would set guidance for preserving records and advice on managing them to prevent obsolescence (Home Office response, Jun 2023). The department noted in June 2023 that chief officers should ensure their forces have systems and processes in place to identify records meeting the criteria for permanent preservation (Home Office response, Jun 2023).

Home Office · 15 Jun 2023 Noted
Words of: Home Office, Government response to the report of the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (CP 857), presented to Parliament by the Home Secretary, 15 June 2023
2.4.4. The new Code of Practice, together with a new, complementary APP on ‘Archiving of records in the public interest’, will set guidance for preserving records where there is a public interest, as well as setting out advice on how appropriate types of records should be managed to prevent obsolescence. Certain police records are archived for their historical value and enduring public interest, for example those involved in major investigations such as a murder. Chief officers should ensure their force has systems and processes in place to identify records that meet the criteria for permanent preservation.
Read full response to DM-21 (opens in a new tab)
Home Office (Primary)
View details of DM-21
DM-23
Noted

Retain documents in digitised form

Recommendation
It is recommended that, whenever a major incident remains under investigation or inquiry, documents should be retained in digitised form, subject to appropriate security measures and made available to those who subsequently and justifiably require access to them.
In brief (written by this site)

The Home Office stated in June 2023 that a new Code of Practice and complementary guidance on archiving records would advise police forces on managing appropriate records to prevent obsolescence and preserving those in the public interest (Home Office response, Jun 2023). The department added that chief officers should ensure their forces maintain systems and processes to identify records meeting the criteria for permanent preservation (Home Office response, Jun 2023). The record holds no update since the department's response of June 2023 (Home Office response, Jun 2023).

Home Office · 15 Jun 2023 Noted
Words of: Home Office, Government response to the report of the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (CP 857), presented to Parliament by the Home Secretary, 15 June 2023
2.4.4. The new Code of Practice, together with a new, complementary APP on ‘Archiving of records in the public interest’, will set guidance for preserving records where there is a public interest, as well as setting out advice on how appropriate types of records should be managed to prevent obsolescence. Certain police records are archived for their historical value and enduring public interest, for example those involved in major investigations such as a murder. Chief officers should ensure their force has systems and processes in place to identify records that meet the criteria for permanent preservation.
Read full response to DM-23 (opens in a new tab)
Home Office (Primary)
View details of DM-23