Grand Canyon
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2021-0392
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 13 Jan 2022
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
2 of 1
56-Day Deadline
13 Jan 2022
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
During the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. 1. The current requirements are laid out in EASA Certification Specification CS 27-952 for small rotorcraft and CS 29-952 for large rotorcraft, these regulations have been adopted by the UK. These requirements do not appear to be fit for purpose as they do not require retrofit to all previously certified rotorcraft.
2. EASA issued a safety bulletin No 2017-18R1 (updated on January 2021) this document states “EASA consider that the installation of any of the modifications listed in Table 1 (of the SIB) for AS 350/ EC 130 in service aircraft will reduce the risk of post crash-fires and contribute to increase the occupant escape time after survival. However, there is no mandatory requirement for the CRFS to be fitted on aircraft.
3. Flying in both small and large rotorcraft that have not been fitted with CRFS, either at initial build or as a retrofit, adds significant risk to the occupants in the event of a crash which disrupts the fuel system.
4. There is nothing in place to mandate the fitting of CRFS as a retrofit and so the risk of post-crash fire in non-CRFS fitted helicopters remains very high with the likelihood of loss of life
5. For the public there does not appear to be any way of knowing whether a particular aircraft has been fitted with the CRFS as there is no central register which records this. The public cannot therefore make an informed decision as to whether to fly on that aircraft.
6. There are still aircraft flying in UK airspace without CRFS which poses a high risk to occupants of the aircraft.
7. These aircraft also pose a risk to the general public who could find themselves in close proximity to an aircraft that has crashed where a fire occurs.
8. Serious consideration needs to given to the issuing of an airworthiness directive to prevent further tragedies, similar to this case happening again.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation have the power to take such action.
2. EASA issued a safety bulletin No 2017-18R1 (updated on January 2021) this document states “EASA consider that the installation of any of the modifications listed in Table 1 (of the SIB) for AS 350/ EC 130 in service aircraft will reduce the risk of post crash-fires and contribute to increase the occupant escape time after survival. However, there is no mandatory requirement for the CRFS to be fitted on aircraft.
3. Flying in both small and large rotorcraft that have not been fitted with CRFS, either at initial build or as a retrofit, adds significant risk to the occupants in the event of a crash which disrupts the fuel system.
4. There is nothing in place to mandate the fitting of CRFS as a retrofit and so the risk of post-crash fire in non-CRFS fitted helicopters remains very high with the likelihood of loss of life
5. For the public there does not appear to be any way of knowing whether a particular aircraft has been fitted with the CRFS as there is no central register which records this. The public cannot therefore make an informed decision as to whether to fly on that aircraft.
6. There are still aircraft flying in UK airspace without CRFS which poses a high risk to occupants of the aircraft.
7. These aircraft also pose a risk to the general public who could find themselves in close proximity to an aircraft that has crashed where a fire occurs.
8. Serious consideration needs to given to the issuing of an airworthiness directive to prevent further tragedies, similar to this case happening again.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation have the power to take such action.
Responses
Response received
View full response
PENELOPE SCHOFIELD – HM SENIOR CORONER FOR AREA OF WEST SUSSEX INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEATHS OF REBECCA DOBSON, JASON HILL, STUART HILL, ELEANOR UDALL AND JONATHAN UDALL CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY RESPONSE TO A REPORT ON ACTION TO PREVENT OTHER DEATHS PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 7, SCHEDULE 5 OF THE CORONERS AND JUSTICE ACT 2009 AND REGULATIONS 28 & 29 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013
The UK Civil Aviation Authority (‘CAA’) responded to the Senior Coroner’s report on action to prevent other deaths pursuant to Regulation 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 on 13 January 2022. In that response, the CAA confirmed that it was willing provide the Senior Coroner with a supplemental report on the progress of its work on or before 31 July 2022. The purpose of this report is to set out the work undertaken by the CAA since 13 January 2022 and explain its future actions. Update As recognised by the Senior Coroner, the design and certification requirements relevant to fitting crash resistant fuel systems (‘CRFS’) in rotorcraft operating in the UK are contained within Certification Specifications CS 27-952 and CS 29-9521. These Certification Specifications now include requirements for CRFS capability in all new Rotorcraft types.
The CAA reviewed the UK Rotorcraft accident data relevant to the specific concerns raised by the Senior Coroner. The accident data relevant to operations in the UK does not highlight an imminent safety risk to passengers who are travelling in previously certified Rotorcraft without CRFS provisions fitted, or to the general public, such that an unsafe condition exists requiring an immediate change to the design and certification requirements or a U.K. wide safety directive.
1 EU Regulation 748/2012 Annex 1 Part 21 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
The matters raised by the Senior Coroner will continue to be supported by the CAA and will form part of a longer-term strategy for rule changes to previously certified Rotorcraft. Any proposals put forward by the CAA will be based on the outcome of international safety studies and work conducted by the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) and the U.S. Federal Aviation Authority (‘FAA’) which have both been based on the Rotorcraft Occupancy Protection Working Group (ROPWG) final report.
The CAA has already held meetings with representatives of both EASA and the FAA to ensure that it is working collaboratively with European and U.S. policy teams on this issue. In addition, the CAA intends to work with U.K. industry and operators to raise public awareness and encourage best practice.
Safety promotion in the U.S. has included inviting owners and operators of Rotorcraft, which have been certificated without compliance with later CRFS related requirements, to consider a partial solution to the safety risk, pending mandating any substantive rule change for all Rotorcraft, such as fitting tear resistant bladder inserts to fuel tanks.
Next Steps
Based on the work carried out to date, including a preliminary assessment of the impact on owners and operators, the CAA is considering safety proposals for existing Rotorcraft on the UK register to be incorporated into the aviation legislation and policy rulemaking programme.
The CAA’s recommended safety proposals will be based on the outcome of international safety studies and implementation work conducted by EASA and the FAA.
These proposals will be retrospective and targeted into Part 26 for existing type designed Rotorcraft,2 and will require the CAA to undertake a period of consultation with owners and operators as part a wider impact assessment.
2 EU Regulation 2015/640 on additional airworthiness specifications for a given type of operations Annex 1 Part 26 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
In the meantime, the CAA will continue to carefully monitor Rotorcraft safety in the U.K. following the recommendations issued by the Senior Coroner and encourage owners and operators of Rotorcraft in the U.K., particularly those performing commercial air transport operations to consider enhancing safety by voluntarily fitting CRFS design provisions, including, tear resistant bladder inserts to fuel tanks pending any future mandatory rule changes.
The CAA will also implement a targeted promotion strategy to the Rotorcraft aviation community.
CAA 29 July 2022
The UK Civil Aviation Authority (‘CAA’) responded to the Senior Coroner’s report on action to prevent other deaths pursuant to Regulation 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 on 13 January 2022. In that response, the CAA confirmed that it was willing provide the Senior Coroner with a supplemental report on the progress of its work on or before 31 July 2022. The purpose of this report is to set out the work undertaken by the CAA since 13 January 2022 and explain its future actions. Update As recognised by the Senior Coroner, the design and certification requirements relevant to fitting crash resistant fuel systems (‘CRFS’) in rotorcraft operating in the UK are contained within Certification Specifications CS 27-952 and CS 29-9521. These Certification Specifications now include requirements for CRFS capability in all new Rotorcraft types.
The CAA reviewed the UK Rotorcraft accident data relevant to the specific concerns raised by the Senior Coroner. The accident data relevant to operations in the UK does not highlight an imminent safety risk to passengers who are travelling in previously certified Rotorcraft without CRFS provisions fitted, or to the general public, such that an unsafe condition exists requiring an immediate change to the design and certification requirements or a U.K. wide safety directive.
1 EU Regulation 748/2012 Annex 1 Part 21 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
The matters raised by the Senior Coroner will continue to be supported by the CAA and will form part of a longer-term strategy for rule changes to previously certified Rotorcraft. Any proposals put forward by the CAA will be based on the outcome of international safety studies and work conducted by the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) and the U.S. Federal Aviation Authority (‘FAA’) which have both been based on the Rotorcraft Occupancy Protection Working Group (ROPWG) final report.
The CAA has already held meetings with representatives of both EASA and the FAA to ensure that it is working collaboratively with European and U.S. policy teams on this issue. In addition, the CAA intends to work with U.K. industry and operators to raise public awareness and encourage best practice.
Safety promotion in the U.S. has included inviting owners and operators of Rotorcraft, which have been certificated without compliance with later CRFS related requirements, to consider a partial solution to the safety risk, pending mandating any substantive rule change for all Rotorcraft, such as fitting tear resistant bladder inserts to fuel tanks.
Next Steps
Based on the work carried out to date, including a preliminary assessment of the impact on owners and operators, the CAA is considering safety proposals for existing Rotorcraft on the UK register to be incorporated into the aviation legislation and policy rulemaking programme.
The CAA’s recommended safety proposals will be based on the outcome of international safety studies and implementation work conducted by EASA and the FAA.
These proposals will be retrospective and targeted into Part 26 for existing type designed Rotorcraft,2 and will require the CAA to undertake a period of consultation with owners and operators as part a wider impact assessment.
2 EU Regulation 2015/640 on additional airworthiness specifications for a given type of operations Annex 1 Part 26 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
In the meantime, the CAA will continue to carefully monitor Rotorcraft safety in the U.K. following the recommendations issued by the Senior Coroner and encourage owners and operators of Rotorcraft in the U.K., particularly those performing commercial air transport operations to consider enhancing safety by voluntarily fitting CRFS design provisions, including, tear resistant bladder inserts to fuel tanks pending any future mandatory rule changes.
The CAA will also implement a targeted promotion strategy to the Rotorcraft aviation community.
CAA 29 July 2022
Response received
View full response
PENELOPE SCHOFIELD – HM SENIOR CORONER FOR AREA OF WEST SUSSEX INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEATHS OF REBECCA DOBSON, JASON HILL, STUART HILL, ELEANOR UDALL AND JONATHAN UDALL CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY RESPONSE TO A REPORT ON ACTION TO PREVENT OTHER DEATHS PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 7, SCHEDULE 5 OF THE CORONERS AND JUSTICE ACT 2009 AND REGULATIONS 28 & 29 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013
The UK Civil Aviation Authority (‘CAA’) has considered the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, including the following concerns raised by the Senior Coroner:
1. The current requirements are laid out in EASA Certification Specification CS 27-952 for small rotorcraft and CS 29-952 for large rotorcraft, these regulations have been adopted by the UK. These requirements do not appear to be fit for purpose as they do not require retrofit to all previously certified rotorcraft.
2. EASA issued a safety bulletin No 2017-18R1 (updated on January 2021) this document states “EASA consider that the installation of any of the modifications listed in Table 1 (of the SIB) for AS 350/ EC 130 in service aircraft will reduce the risk of post-crash fires and contribute to increase the occupant escape time after survival. However, there is no mandatory requirement for the CRFS to be fitted on aircraft.
3. Flying in both small and large rotorcraft that have not been fitted with CRFS, either at initial build or as a retrofit, adds significant risk to the occupants in the event of a crash which disrupts the fuel system.
4. There is nothing in place to mandate the fitting of CRFS as a retrofit and so the risk of post-crash fire in non-CRFS fitted helicopters remains very high with the likelihood of loss of life
5. For the public there does not appear to be any way of knowing whether a particular aircraft has been fitted with the CRFS as there is no central register which records this. The public cannot therefore make an informed decision as to whether to fly on that aircraft.
6. There are still aircraft flying in UK airspace without CRFS which poses a high risk to occupants of the aircraft.
7. These aircraft also pose a risk to the general public who could find themselves in close proximity to an aircraft that has crashed where a fire occurs.
8. Serious consideration needs to be given to the issuing of an airworthiness directive to prevent further tragedies, similar to this case happening again.
Introduction
The CAA would first like to express its sincere condolences to the families, friends, and loved ones of those who lost their lives in this tragic accident.
The CAA was not an Interested Person at these inquests. As such, it did not have access to the evidence. When preparing this response, with a view to implementing future actions, the CAA has relied on the National Transportation Safety Board Investigation (‘NTSB’) Report dated 14th January 2021, information obtained in its capacity as a member of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (‘ICAO’), as a former member of the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’)1 and analysis of incident reports received under the UK’s mandatory aviation occurrence reporting scheme2.
The CAA has further relied on engagement with the UK distributor for the EC 130 aircraft and representatives from the wider UK rotorcraft industry in the aftermath of this accident.
With effect from 1 January 2021 the CAA has established a national rule making programme, working with the Department for Transport, for managing proposed changes to the existing regulatory framework for aviation safety in the UK. This programme is designed to align, where appropriate, with technical specifications, known as Standards and Recommended Practices (‘SARP’s’) adopted by the Council of ICAO and separate global rule making, including that directed by EASA and the US Federal Aviation Authority (‘FAA’).
Responsibility for overseeing the design and certification requirements for rotorcraft operating in the UK, including Certification Specifications CS 27-952 and CS 29-9523 was transferred to the CAA on 1 January 2021 and now forms part of this rule making programme.
1 The UK CAA ceased its membership of EASA with effect from 31 December 2020. 2 The CAA is responsible for receiving UK Mandatory Occurrence Reports in accordance with EU Regulation 376/2014 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. 3 EU Regulation 748/2012 Annex 1 Part 21 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Next Steps
EASA continues work to reduce the risks associated with rotorcraft post-crash fires which forms part of the European Plan for Aviation Safety 2021-2025 and the Rotorcraft Safety Roadmap. The FAA also continues similar work in conjunction with the Rotorcraft Occupant Protection Working Group (‘ROPWG’)4.
EASA issued Safety Information Bulletin (‘SIB’) 2017-18 (updated on 15th May 2019 and 14th January 2021) including recommendations for Crash Resistant Fuel System (‘CRFS’) modifications for AS 350/EC 130 rotorcraft. EASA subsequently published Terms of Reference for Rule Making Task (‘RMT’).0710 on 16 December 2021. The RMT is sub- divided into two areas; design certification and proposed retrospective action, and future production and is focussed on improving survivability in the event of a rotorcraft accident, specifically in relation to post accident fires through the installation of CRFS and Crash Resistant Seats and Structures (‘CRSS’). The RMT will assess whether it is justifiable to retroactively apply the requirements for CRFS and CRSS to existing small CS-27 rotorcraft, small CS-27 Category A rotorcraft, and large CS-29 rotorcraft and/or to the future production of already type-certified rotorcraft.
An important step in the RMT process will be for EASA to carry out a Regulatory Impact Assessment designed to assess any proposed (mandatory) rule making decision against the economic, environmental, proportionality and social impacts of that decision. The UK will be represented during the EASA RMT review process by the British Helicopter Association (‘BHA’). Should EASA conclude a mandatory rule change is required, it will issue a Notice of Proposed Amendment to the relevant EU Regulations and the Acceptable Means of Compliance that accompany those regulations.
The CAA will continue to review UK aviation safety data relevant to the concerns raised by the Senior Coroner and monitor related developments arising from EASA RMT.0710. The CAA will also contact the FAA to understand the rationale for recommendations from
4 The ARAC Rotorcraft Occupant Protection Working Group was established in the US on 22 December 2015. This Group has issued safety recommendations for rotorcraft operating in the US, including “The FAA should require, in all rotorcraft, the installation (retrofit) of crash resistant fuel bladders that meet the requirements of the 50-foot fuel cell drop test in or out of structure, and that demonstrate a minimum of 250 lb puncture resistance”.
ROPWG, including requirements in all rotorcraft for the (retrofit) installation of crash resistant fuel bladders.
The CAA will then consider whether rule changes are required to align UK aviation safety requirements, where appropriate. Any decision reached to take mandatory action must follow extensive technical evaluation including, but not limited to, testing CRFS and CRSS to ensure compliance with design and certification requirements for each applicable aircraft type.
Conclusion
The CAA will continue to work with international and domestic aviation stakeholders to mitigate the risks to public safety in accordance with the concerns highlighted in the Senior Coroner’s Regulation 28 report. The CAA will conduct further detailed analysis of those risks, insofar as they relate to UK registered rotorcraft, together with an assessment of the impact of any subsequent proposals for rule changes and amendments to safety guidance. The CAA will be informed by analysis of UK aviation safety data, the progress of EASA RMT.0710 and work undertaken by the FAA arising from the ROPWG.
The CAA is willing provide the Senior Coroner with a supplemental report on the progress of this work on or before 31st July 2022.
CAA 13 January 2022
The UK Civil Aviation Authority (‘CAA’) has considered the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, including the following concerns raised by the Senior Coroner:
1. The current requirements are laid out in EASA Certification Specification CS 27-952 for small rotorcraft and CS 29-952 for large rotorcraft, these regulations have been adopted by the UK. These requirements do not appear to be fit for purpose as they do not require retrofit to all previously certified rotorcraft.
2. EASA issued a safety bulletin No 2017-18R1 (updated on January 2021) this document states “EASA consider that the installation of any of the modifications listed in Table 1 (of the SIB) for AS 350/ EC 130 in service aircraft will reduce the risk of post-crash fires and contribute to increase the occupant escape time after survival. However, there is no mandatory requirement for the CRFS to be fitted on aircraft.
3. Flying in both small and large rotorcraft that have not been fitted with CRFS, either at initial build or as a retrofit, adds significant risk to the occupants in the event of a crash which disrupts the fuel system.
4. There is nothing in place to mandate the fitting of CRFS as a retrofit and so the risk of post-crash fire in non-CRFS fitted helicopters remains very high with the likelihood of loss of life
5. For the public there does not appear to be any way of knowing whether a particular aircraft has been fitted with the CRFS as there is no central register which records this. The public cannot therefore make an informed decision as to whether to fly on that aircraft.
6. There are still aircraft flying in UK airspace without CRFS which poses a high risk to occupants of the aircraft.
7. These aircraft also pose a risk to the general public who could find themselves in close proximity to an aircraft that has crashed where a fire occurs.
8. Serious consideration needs to be given to the issuing of an airworthiness directive to prevent further tragedies, similar to this case happening again.
Introduction
The CAA would first like to express its sincere condolences to the families, friends, and loved ones of those who lost their lives in this tragic accident.
The CAA was not an Interested Person at these inquests. As such, it did not have access to the evidence. When preparing this response, with a view to implementing future actions, the CAA has relied on the National Transportation Safety Board Investigation (‘NTSB’) Report dated 14th January 2021, information obtained in its capacity as a member of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (‘ICAO’), as a former member of the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’)1 and analysis of incident reports received under the UK’s mandatory aviation occurrence reporting scheme2.
The CAA has further relied on engagement with the UK distributor for the EC 130 aircraft and representatives from the wider UK rotorcraft industry in the aftermath of this accident.
With effect from 1 January 2021 the CAA has established a national rule making programme, working with the Department for Transport, for managing proposed changes to the existing regulatory framework for aviation safety in the UK. This programme is designed to align, where appropriate, with technical specifications, known as Standards and Recommended Practices (‘SARP’s’) adopted by the Council of ICAO and separate global rule making, including that directed by EASA and the US Federal Aviation Authority (‘FAA’).
Responsibility for overseeing the design and certification requirements for rotorcraft operating in the UK, including Certification Specifications CS 27-952 and CS 29-9523 was transferred to the CAA on 1 January 2021 and now forms part of this rule making programme.
1 The UK CAA ceased its membership of EASA with effect from 31 December 2020. 2 The CAA is responsible for receiving UK Mandatory Occurrence Reports in accordance with EU Regulation 376/2014 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. 3 EU Regulation 748/2012 Annex 1 Part 21 as retained (and amended in UK domestic law) under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Next Steps
EASA continues work to reduce the risks associated with rotorcraft post-crash fires which forms part of the European Plan for Aviation Safety 2021-2025 and the Rotorcraft Safety Roadmap. The FAA also continues similar work in conjunction with the Rotorcraft Occupant Protection Working Group (‘ROPWG’)4.
EASA issued Safety Information Bulletin (‘SIB’) 2017-18 (updated on 15th May 2019 and 14th January 2021) including recommendations for Crash Resistant Fuel System (‘CRFS’) modifications for AS 350/EC 130 rotorcraft. EASA subsequently published Terms of Reference for Rule Making Task (‘RMT’).0710 on 16 December 2021. The RMT is sub- divided into two areas; design certification and proposed retrospective action, and future production and is focussed on improving survivability in the event of a rotorcraft accident, specifically in relation to post accident fires through the installation of CRFS and Crash Resistant Seats and Structures (‘CRSS’). The RMT will assess whether it is justifiable to retroactively apply the requirements for CRFS and CRSS to existing small CS-27 rotorcraft, small CS-27 Category A rotorcraft, and large CS-29 rotorcraft and/or to the future production of already type-certified rotorcraft.
An important step in the RMT process will be for EASA to carry out a Regulatory Impact Assessment designed to assess any proposed (mandatory) rule making decision against the economic, environmental, proportionality and social impacts of that decision. The UK will be represented during the EASA RMT review process by the British Helicopter Association (‘BHA’). Should EASA conclude a mandatory rule change is required, it will issue a Notice of Proposed Amendment to the relevant EU Regulations and the Acceptable Means of Compliance that accompany those regulations.
The CAA will continue to review UK aviation safety data relevant to the concerns raised by the Senior Coroner and monitor related developments arising from EASA RMT.0710. The CAA will also contact the FAA to understand the rationale for recommendations from
4 The ARAC Rotorcraft Occupant Protection Working Group was established in the US on 22 December 2015. This Group has issued safety recommendations for rotorcraft operating in the US, including “The FAA should require, in all rotorcraft, the installation (retrofit) of crash resistant fuel bladders that meet the requirements of the 50-foot fuel cell drop test in or out of structure, and that demonstrate a minimum of 250 lb puncture resistance”.
ROPWG, including requirements in all rotorcraft for the (retrofit) installation of crash resistant fuel bladders.
The CAA will then consider whether rule changes are required to align UK aviation safety requirements, where appropriate. Any decision reached to take mandatory action must follow extensive technical evaluation including, but not limited to, testing CRFS and CRSS to ensure compliance with design and certification requirements for each applicable aircraft type.
Conclusion
The CAA will continue to work with international and domestic aviation stakeholders to mitigate the risks to public safety in accordance with the concerns highlighted in the Senior Coroner’s Regulation 28 report. The CAA will conduct further detailed analysis of those risks, insofar as they relate to UK registered rotorcraft, together with an assessment of the impact of any subsequent proposals for rule changes and amendments to safety guidance. The CAA will be informed by analysis of UK aviation safety data, the progress of EASA RMT.0710 and work undertaken by the FAA arising from the ROPWG.
The CAA is willing provide the Senior Coroner with a supplemental report on the progress of this work on or before 31st July 2022.
CAA 13 January 2022
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 28th March 2018 I commenced an investigation into the deaths of Rebecca Dobson, Jason Hill, Stuart Hill, Eleanor Udall, and Jonathan Udall. Their deaths occurred following a helicopter crash over the Grand Canyon on 10th February 2018. This investigation started when these individuals were repatriated back to West Sussex. The investigation was concluded with the Inquests being held on 17th November 2021. At the end of the Inquest, I concluded that all Rebecca Dobson, Jason Hill, Stuart Hill, Eleanor Udall, and Jonathan Udall died as a result of an accident, Following the Inquest, I indicated that I would be making a Regulation 28 report addressing concerns that were raised at the Inquest regarding the risk to passengers who flying in aircraft that have not been fitted with a crash resistant fuel system. The helicopter involved in this accident did not have a Crash Resistant Fuel System (CRFS) and upon impact caught fire very quickly. Rebecca, Jason, Stuart, Eleanor, and Jonathan had survived the crash itself but died from thermal injuries and smoke inhalation as a result of the fire that then ensued.
Circumstances of the Death
On 10th February 2018, an Airbus Helicopter , operated by Papillon was taking passengers on an Air Tour of the Grand Canyon. At about 17.19 pm the aircraft crashed. Within a matter of seconds, a fire started and three of the passengers died at the scene. Three others, along with the pilot, were taken to Hospital but sadly two of the three succumbed to their injuries and died shortly thereafter. The pilot and one passenger survived albeit with life changing injuries.
The National Transportation Safety Board carried out an investigation and found that the probably cause of the accident was “A loss of tail rotor effectiveness, the pilot’s subsequent loss of helicopter control, and collision with terrain during an approach to land in gusting tail wind conditions in an area of potential downdrafts and turbulence.”
The helicopter in question was not required to be fitted with a CRFS.
It should be pointed out that the medical evidence supported the fact that all the passengers were alive following the crash and all of those who died as a result of or from the effects of the fire. None of those who had died had suffered any trauma.
The evidence heard at the Inquest supported the fact that had there not been a fire it was more probably than not that they would have survived.
It cannot be said for sure in this particular case if the type of the terrain played a part in the penetration of the fuel tank on this helicopter or whether this terrain would have had a similar effect on a CRFS if one had been installed.
The National Transportation Safety Board carried out an investigation and found that the probably cause of the accident was “A loss of tail rotor effectiveness, the pilot’s subsequent loss of helicopter control, and collision with terrain during an approach to land in gusting tail wind conditions in an area of potential downdrafts and turbulence.”
The helicopter in question was not required to be fitted with a CRFS.
It should be pointed out that the medical evidence supported the fact that all the passengers were alive following the crash and all of those who died as a result of or from the effects of the fire. None of those who had died had suffered any trauma.
The evidence heard at the Inquest supported the fact that had there not been a fire it was more probably than not that they would have survived.
It cannot be said for sure in this particular case if the type of the terrain played a part in the penetration of the fuel tank on this helicopter or whether this terrain would have had a similar effect on a CRFS if one had been installed.
Copies Sent To
Airbus Helicopters Papillon Airways Air Accident Investigation Branch
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.