Sara Jones

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2023-0118
Date of Report 15 April 2023
Coroner Duncan Ritchie
Response Deadline est. 10 June 2023
All 2 responses received · Deadline: 10 Jun 2023
Response Status
Responses 2 of 1
56-Day Deadline 10 Jun 2023
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
A CT scan of the deceased was undertaken at Ysbyty Gwynedd late on the evening of 30th March 2021. The deceased was then transferred to the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent by air ambulance before the radiologist's report on the CT scan was available. Because of this the patient was transferred without the radiologist's report. The radiologist's report became available shortly before 1:00am on 31st March 2021, but was not sent to the Royal Stoke University Hospital until 5:35am that day. It was not clear that safe receipt of the report in Stoke-on-Trent was ever confirmed. Doctors in Stoke-on-Trent then failed to follow up on signs of a possible bowel injury which were indicated in the radiologist's report on the CT scan. During the inquest I was told that the circumstances of this case were unusual and that there was not a protocol in place to ensure the prompt and secure delivery of radiology reports in circumstances like this.
Responses
University Hospitals of North Midlands
5 May 2023
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Ritchie Sara Anest JONES

Further to my letter dated 16 March 2023, I am pleased to provide a response to your report under paragraph 7 of Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, addressing your concerns surrounding the death of Sara Anest Jones.

Recorded Circumstances of the Death Sara Anest Jones died at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent on 2 April 2021 of complications of a bowel injury sustained in a road traffic collision on 30 March 2021. Miss Jones was treated for her injuries at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent. Those responsible for Miss Jones’ care at the Royal Stoke Hospital did not identify that she had sustained a bowel injury and consequently it remained untreated. Miss Jones developed peritonitis because of the untreated bowel injury, from which she later died.

Concerns During the course of the inquest you felt that evidence revealed matters giving rise for concern. In your opinion, matters for concern are as follows:

1. The patient was admitted to Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent as a “polytrauma” patient who had sustained serious injuries in a road traffic collision. Following her admission, she was treated by doctors from several different specialisms, but it was apparent that some doctors involved in her care concentrated on only the injuries that fell within their speciality and did not consider the patient as a whole. At an important stage in her treatment the general surgeons thought that the orthopaedic surgeons would alert them to any intervention which was needed from their speciality, whilst the orthopaedic surgeons expected the general surgeons to regularly review the patient.

Partly as a result of the doctors concentrating only on the injuries which fell into their speciality signs of a bowel injury which the patient sustained were missed. The patient subsequently died as a result of complications of the undiagnosed bowel injury.

Evidence was given during the inquest that a major trauma consultant role was in the process of being developed at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent to address issues like this, but that the role was only 50% filled at the current time.

You reported this matter under Paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

Action Taken The University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust has taken the issues highlighted during the inquest of Sara Jones seriously and indeed, I am grateful that you have raised your concerns.

1. At the time of the inquest the Court heard that the current trauma rota was 50% filled and that the Trust were seeking to appoint further consultant cover so that all trauma patients are reviewed by a trauma consultant within 24 hours of their admission. In order to progress this, the Trust requires a further 6 consultants to be included on the rota.

In order to fulfil this, an internal recruitment process has already been initiated. One additional consultant is now in post, and negotiations are underway with a further three consultants which will fill our Monday-Friday rota. We intend to have this rota staffed by the beginning of August 2023. Approval for the development of a business case is under consideration for the expansion of the Major Trauma service, to include weekend and out of hours cover. We intend to remove any potential confusion around team responsibilities by redefining the Major Trauma Service. This will mean that the Major Trauma Consultant is primarily responsible for the whole patient review and will liaise with specialty teams as appropriate. The timescale for this redesign is within the next 12 months.

I do hope that the above information provided assurance that the Trust has taken the concerns raised at the inquest seriously.

Should you wish to discuss any aspect of this report further, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Ritchie,

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Sara Anest Jones

I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 15 March 2023, issued by yourself to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, following the inquest touching the death of Sara Anest Jones.

I would like to begin by offering my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Ms Jones.

In the Notice, you highlighted concerns regarding the prompt and secure delivery of radiology reports from our hospitals to our external major trauma tertiary centre, the Royal Stoke University Hospital. I note that the University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, as joint parties to the Notice, will also respond to you.

We have carefully considered the inquest findings and your Notice, and in response our Emergency Department Clinical Lead has taken forward improvement work. This work has been done alongside our own Radiology Department and our partners at the Royal Stoke University Hospital.

We have now established a process that if a patient leaves our emergency departments without a report, which is very rare, then the report will be sent by email and its safe receipt will be confirmed by telephone.

This process is being included in our major trauma standard operating procedure and checklists by the end of May 2023 by our Trauma Network Manager. This will ensure staff are clear on the actions they need to take.

All trauma transfers are discussed and reviewed at our Trauma Group, so this group will have oversight of this new procedure and will ensure this this new process is subject to ongoing audit to give assurance.

Dyddiad / Date: 03 May 2023 Duncan Ritchie HM Assistant Coroner Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire Civic Centre Glebe Street Stoke-on-Trent ST4 1HH Bloc 5, Llys Carlton, Parc BusnesLlanelwy, Llanelwy, LL17 0JG
---------------------------------- Block 5, Carlton Court, St Asaph Business Park, St Asaph, LL17 0JG

Once again, I offer my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Ms Jones for their loss.

I hope our response offers you assurance that we have learned from the inquest and made changes to our ways of working. Should you require any further information or assurance we would be happy to provide.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 10 March 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Sara Anest JONES aged
25. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 07 March 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Sara Anest Jones died at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent on 2nd April 2021 of complications of a bowel injury sustained in a road traffic collision on 30th March 2021. Miss Jones was treated for her injuries at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke­ on-Trent. Those responsible for Miss Jones' care at the Royal Stoke University Hospital did not identify that she had sustained a bowel injury and consequently it remained untreated. Miss Jones developed peritonitis because of the untreated bowel injury, from which she later died.
Circumstances of the Death
Road traffic collision contributed to by neglect
Copies Sent To
2. The Royal Stoke University Hospital
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Close HSS Dispute Resolution Procedure when HSSA opens
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Postgraduate training governance clarity
Fuller Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion Performance Benchmarking
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion 2024 Review Progress
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion Outcome Framework
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
NHSBT Transfusion Outcome Funding
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Blood Tracking Systems Funding
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Pre-1996 Transfusion Testing
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification
National Haemophilia Database Support
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Eligibility Conditions for Infected Persons
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.