Elizabeth Van Der Drift
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0451
All 4 responses received
· Deadline: 8 Oct 2024
Response Status
Responses
4 of 4
56-Day Deadline
8 Oct 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
(1) During the course of hearing the evidence I was shown a picture of the packaging for the laundry tablets/pods in question. The packaging, in this instance, was predominantly bright pink and white, with orange, yellow and green also present. One witness (a carer experienced in caring for those living with dementia) gave me her view that the packaging bore more than a passing resemblance to a bag of sweets, and she considered that this was more likely to be the case when viewed from the point of view of a person living with dementia or some other cognitive impairment.
In my view, the packaging of this particular product is not alone among similar products, that also opt for bright, eye-catching colours. It was for this reason that I formed the view that sending this report to the individual manufacturer/retailer (under whose brand the product was labelled) would be short-sighted. The employment of eye-catching and bright colours appears to be an industry-wide phenomenon.
It has long been acknowledged that products of this nature can pose risks to children; however, there appears to be less acknowledgement of the risks posed to those living with dementia or other forms of cognitive impairment.
In terms of the laundry tablets/pods themselves, I note that these have a jelly-like appearance and again I regard them as being colourful and potentially sweet-like in their appearance. This again has the serious potential to render a highly toxic/hazardous product as appealing to those with dementia or other cognitive impairment (as well as children). There is a wealth of material available (media reports, scientific studies and research etc.) to document the relatively frequency that products of this nature are accidentally or inadvertently ingested.
I am well aware of The Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations 1989, UKSI 1989 No. 1291 and note Regulation 4, in particular. However, it seems to me either that the regulations themselves have insufficient regard to those living with dementia or other cognitive impairment or that the application of the regulations is not approached with sufficient rigour.
The overarching concern here is that laundry tablets/pods and their packaging are being produced in a way that, by virtue of their bright colouring, appearance, and packaging, are being confused with food by people living with dementia or other cognitive impairment. The issue is, in my opinion, compounded when one considers that the products themselves are far from innocuous in the event of their accidental ingestion.
(2) In this case, I also noted that there was no obvious design feature, in terms of the packaging, that makes accessing the content particularly difficult for someone with even the most basic of manual dexterity. In my view, this only adds to the risks.
In my view, the packaging of this particular product is not alone among similar products, that also opt for bright, eye-catching colours. It was for this reason that I formed the view that sending this report to the individual manufacturer/retailer (under whose brand the product was labelled) would be short-sighted. The employment of eye-catching and bright colours appears to be an industry-wide phenomenon.
It has long been acknowledged that products of this nature can pose risks to children; however, there appears to be less acknowledgement of the risks posed to those living with dementia or other forms of cognitive impairment.
In terms of the laundry tablets/pods themselves, I note that these have a jelly-like appearance and again I regard them as being colourful and potentially sweet-like in their appearance. This again has the serious potential to render a highly toxic/hazardous product as appealing to those with dementia or other cognitive impairment (as well as children). There is a wealth of material available (media reports, scientific studies and research etc.) to document the relatively frequency that products of this nature are accidentally or inadvertently ingested.
I am well aware of The Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations 1989, UKSI 1989 No. 1291 and note Regulation 4, in particular. However, it seems to me either that the regulations themselves have insufficient regard to those living with dementia or other cognitive impairment or that the application of the regulations is not approached with sufficient rigour.
The overarching concern here is that laundry tablets/pods and their packaging are being produced in a way that, by virtue of their bright colouring, appearance, and packaging, are being confused with food by people living with dementia or other cognitive impairment. The issue is, in my opinion, compounded when one considers that the products themselves are far from innocuous in the event of their accidental ingestion.
(2) In this case, I also noted that there was no obvious design feature, in terms of the packaging, that makes accessing the content particularly difficult for someone with even the most basic of manual dexterity. In my view, this only adds to the risks.
Responses
Response received
View full response
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
2 October 2024
UKCPI response to the Coroner’s Prevention of Future Deaths report – Elizabeth Van Der Drift
The UK Cleaning Products Industry Association (UKCPI) is the leading trade association representing UK producers of cleaning and hygiene products used in the home as well as in industrial and institutional workplaces.
Our UK members manufacture soaps, detergents, dish wash, laundry, air care products, surface cleaners, polishes and disinfectants including sanitisers. Products that – perhaps uniquely – are used in every home, in every workplace, every day, by everyone to provide the clean, safe and hygienic environment we take for granted.
As a trade association we work in partnership with our stakeholders including policy makers, the public and the media, to inform discussions about cleanliness, hygiene and sustainable cleaning and to ensure that our products are used safely and as intended. We were saddened to hear of Elizabeth Van Der Drift’s accidental death and the circumstances in which this happened. This is especially so given the purpose of our products is to enhance and provide a safe home or workplace for families and individuals.
This tragic accident is extremely rare. The National Poisons Information Service or NPIS receive approximately 40,000 telephone enquiries per year. Typically 8% of enquiries per year involve adults aged > 74 years.
The majority of these exposures (>80%) involve medicines, with household products accounting for <10% of exposures. Of these 300 exposures per year 78% involve washing up liquid, anti-bacterial or disinfectant products, 10% kettle descalers, 6.5% laundry powders and liquids and 5% (or 15 exposures) are attributable to laundry capsules and dishwash tablets. In approximately 2% of enquiries regarding patients in this age group (>74 years), a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s was documented, and dementia recorded in around 10%. Most exposures (85%) occur in the home and 12% in nursing/residential homes. NPIS has a classification (the PSS or Poisoning Severity Score) for assessing the severity of poisoning at the time of the enquiry. ‘Moderate’ toxicity is observed in 3% and ‘severe’ toxicity in a similar number of cases. The majority of exposures reported to the NPIS (>90%) result in no or minor clinical features only.
The circumstances in which this accident happened was described (media reports) as ‘assisted living’ and could provide laundering through a shared or communal laundry room. If this was the case it would likely have been unsupervised, where the product might have been easily available especially if the packaging was not secured properly after use or stored safely. What this data highlights is that accidental exposures occur from a range of household products and reinforces our approach to raise awareness of the need for safe storage of all cleaning and hygiene products.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
What follows is a short background and review on liquid capsules safe use and then our proposed action addressing the concern of safe storage of household cleaning products including laundry capsules in the elderly / dementia sufferer environment.
Liquid laundry detergent capsules (LLDC) - background
a. LLDC are a single or unit dose of detergent contained in a water-soluble film. They most commonly contain a mix of anionic and non-ionic surfactants together with solvents, colourants, fragrance and other ingredients such as enzymes in biological products.
b. LLDC enable the user to accurately dose for a laundry wash (one capsule per load) to avoid overdosing and are in a soluble format for use at low temperature to reduce energy use.
c. They are therefore seen as a convenient and sustainable laundry washing product with over a billion capsules sold annually in the UK alone. They have been on the UK market since 2000.
d. However, as their popularity increased there were a small number of accidental exposures, mostly involving young children. Although the majority of those exposed to liquid laundry detergent capsules were asymptomatic or suffered only minor clinical features after exposure, a small proportion required a hospital visiti. Reference: NPIS Clinical Tox 2017 paper
e. There have been no known UK infant fatalities due to these exposures and almost all were the result of unintended access to the product in the home, i.e. either the capsule container was left open and / or stored in an easily accessible location for an unsupervised infant.
Ensuring safe use and preventing infant accidents
a. Due to growing concern by the industry over the accidental exposures, in 2012 AISE, the European trade association for detergent manufacturers, established its own voluntary set of safety measures. This is named the Product Stewardship Programme (PSP) for Liquid Detergent Capsulesii.
b. These safety measures were quickly adopted by all EU capsule manufacturers, including in the UK, and require manufacturers to:
i. ensure the outer packaging is obscure or opaque
ii. modify the closures to an industry standard to impede the access by infants
iii. provide icons and safe use messages prominently on the outer packaging by use of a visible industry-wide safety icon and panel – examples below for both pouches and box packaging:
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
iv. adopt an advertising code of conduct and industry-wide safety message in brand communication including broadcast
v. Maintain a dedicated web-based campaign namely
c. In 2014, this then became the template for adoption into EU legislation; the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation or CLP.iii This added further protective measures such as imposing a minimum resistance of the soluble film membrane, retaining its liquid content for at least 30 seconds when the soluble packaging is placed in water at 20°C and adding an aversive bittering agent ‘which elicits oral repulsive behaviour within a maximum of 6 seconds’. The industry’s own PSP programme was retained as it goes beyond the regulatory requirement in areas of on pack communication and advertising.
d. In 2014, AISE carried out a large-scale prospective research study in collaboration with five Poison Centres, to help better understand accident circumstances and thus to confirm that the most appropriate measures are taken to address any safety concerns. It found that since the introduction of the industry’s PSP, the number of incidents reported to the Poison Centres have decreased on average by 32% and that the preliminary findings of the data indicate that unsafe storage was the main cause of accidents involving children.
e. In 2017, the European Commission produced a final report on Detergent Mixtures in Soluble Packaging (the ‘LiquiCaps’ study’)iv to study i) LLDC safety, ii) the impact of measures on LLDC safety and iii) appraise possible additional safety measures. The report in full can be found here, but in summary it also concluded that the majority of accidental exposures occurred when the products were easily accessible by children in the home.
f. In the UK, and in addition to the above voluntary and regulatory requirements, we established a home safety campaign with RoSPA (The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents), to promote safe storage in the home.
‘Take Action Today’v is a communications and awareness programme delivered through existing home visit programmes aimed at families with new babies and / or families in areas of deprivation known to have high rates of infant accidents.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
It is now in its 11th year with over 50 regional launches taking the safe storage message directly into over 700,000 families to help prevent poisoning accidents in the home. The professional home visitor has a simple checklist to go through with the parent and there is a kitchen ‘magnetic’ leave behind with safe storage messages. The campaign has been hugely successful in reducing hospital admissions due to accidental exposures amongst infants by 45% for period 2022/23 and 50% for 2023/24 (NHS data provided by RoSPA). Detailed campaign presentation can be found here.vi
Extrapolation of measures to reduce infant accidents to the elderly/dementia sufferer
There is a significant overlap in the cognitive state of young children and that of elderly dementia sufferers which is best described as an “absence of inhibition”, or said differently, an absence of risk awareness around the house. (Covey, H. C. (1993). A return to infancy: Old age and the second childhood in history. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 36, 81–90)vii
This similarity could allow us to extrapolate the conclusions of the research and campaigning with parents of infants to carers / care managers of cognitively impaired persons/dementia sufferers.
We know that infants build up their inhibitions about what to put into their mouth and what not to put in their mouth by experience, hence initially many items are explored by mouth. For dementia sufferers, as the disease progresses they often lose these learned inhibitions and / or the ability to distinguish hazardous materials from non-hazardous such as foodstuffs.
This loss of inhibition can be gradual, intermittent i.e. extremely difficult to predict and as manufacturers have no control over the product use in the user environment, so the role of the care giver becomes critical in ensuring that the user environment is safe.
The measures industry currently takes, both regulatory and voluntary, mean that the product itself and the packaging it is in is inherently safe and the likelihood of accidental ingestion should be extremely low for all age groups.
Our ‘Take Action Today’ campaign aims to make the home environment safe for infants which means ensuring that the parent is suitably informed about safe use and safe storage.
This approach could be applied to the care environment and has the added benefit that it also helps remind and therefore prevent accidental exposure to other cleaning product types (acid and bleach based corrosive cleaners) as well as other substances such as medicines.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
Proposed action
The industry has demonstrated that it is prepared to take appropriate and proportionate action to ensure the safe use of its products.
As described above, we have had and continue to have a leading role in addressing infant accidental exposure in the home and believe this experience can be applied with similar success in the elderly / dementia care environment.
Our actions laid out below are quick to deliver, reliable in terms of ongoing impact, applicable to the safe storage of all cleaning products (such as bleaches and disinfectants etc), reinforce the message for the safe storage of other products such as medicines and are proportionate to the level of accidental exposure currently being recorded.
Speaking to the CQC and charities including RoSPA, Age UK, Dementia UK and The Alzheimer's Society, there does not seem to be any clear guidance on the safe use or storage of cleaning chemicals in a care environment - be that in the home of a sufferer or in a care home setting (unlike for medicines). There is The fundamental standards - Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk)viii which apply to all registered care facilities regulated by the CQC in England. Included in the standards is ‘premises and equipment’ and this includes ensuring that premises are safe, and so can include care homes responsibilities on safety around the home on chemical storage etc.
It is relevant to note that responses to our Keep Caps From Kids website include emails from elderly consumers (often with reduced hand strength or arthritis) complaining about the difficulty in opening laundry containers (and having to resort to knives and scissors) and they admit that they do not reclose the hard to open containers.
We know that the majority of large care and residential homes will have professional laundering and cleaning services on or off site and the likelihood of patients accessing hazardous products is minimal.
However, in the smaller establishments, assisted living, independent living and ultimately in the home of say an early-stage dementia sufferer we believe that risks of accidental exposure can be best managed and minimised by ensuring that the care giver has greater awareness of safe use and storage of household chemicals. NPIS data shows that 80% of accidental exposures occur in the homes of the elderly <74yrs.
There is already an established requirement for the safe use and storage of medicines with regulation (Medicines Act 1968) and guidance (NICEix and CQCx) existing to ensure effective storage in a lockable cupboard for example.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
However, guidance on providing a safe environment tends to be general in nature and not specific to avoid accidental exposure to household cleaning products, including LLDC. For example:
me_dementia_friendly.pdf
As previously described, UKCPI has a longstanding and successful national campaign delivered by RoSPA targeting families with infants.
‘Take Action Today’ aims to reduce accidents amongst children under 5 by ensuring parents understand how to use and store safely all household cleaning products (including laundry capsules), to prevent infant access, i.e. the campaign builds on the safety measures already built into the product and product packaging and addresses the home environment where the cleaning products are used.
We believe that in partnership with the appropriate agencies or charities we could research, develop and tailor such a campaign to target care givers in assisted living, independent living, care homes, residential care and in the home of the sufferer to ensure that they are fully aware of the need to ensure safe and secure storage of household cleaning products including LLDC.
Our action would be to explore how such a campaign could be executed with industry support and delivered through organisations such as the CQC and charities such as RoSPA, Age UK, Dementia UK and The Alzheimer’s Society, all of whom we have already had preliminary discussions.
Such a campaign would deliver a broad range of reduced risk not just of accidental ingestion but also skin and eye damage from all household products as well as other products categories such as medicines and garden chemicals.
We would expect to be able to report back within 12 months on campaign messages, delivery partners and how to measure impact.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
Annex The Coroner’s concerns
a. The Coroner specifically references LLDC ‘as being colourful and potentially sweet-like in their appearance’. The bright colour of capsules was also claimed to be a factor in infant poisonings and led to a body of research workxi and an EU Commission reportxii concluding that there was no discernible colour preference when infants were exposed to a range of coloured household laundry products.
Also, an inquest only recently reported that a male dementia sufferer died after pouring a liquid laundry product on his breakfast cereal. The detergent was purple so unlikely to be confused with milk/foodstuff. This would support the view that it is not colour but simply a dementia sufferer’s inability, at some point in their disease progression, to distinguish between hazardous and non-hazardous materials. UK legislation specifically requires manufacturers to avoid any confusion over their product use, for example: Under CLP there is a provision that “Packaging containing a hazardous substance or a mixture supplied to the general public shall not have either a shape or design likely to attract or arouse the active curiosity of children or to mislead consumers, or have a similar presentation or a design used for foodstuff or animal feeding stuff or medicinal or cosmetic products, which would mislead consumers.”xiii Under the Biocidal Products Regulation; “In addition, products which may be mistaken for food, including drink, or feed shall be packaged to minimise the likelihood of such a mistake being made. If they are available to the general public, they shall contain components to discourage their consumption and, in particular, shall not be attractive to children.”xiv Finally, it should be noted that as far as the industry is aware there have been no successful cases brought against any cleaning product including laundry under the criteria of The Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations 1989. The regulation looks at the form, odour, colour, appearance, packaging, labelling, volume or size when determining if it is imitating a food.
b. The Coroner specifically mentions ‘no obvious design feature, in terms of the packaging, that makes accessing the content particularly difficult’. This is confusing given the various measure previously described required under CLP.
I have requested and received samples of the pouch packaging for this SKU and can confirm that it is fully compliant with the requirements of GB CLP Regulation and industry PSP.
Whilst unable to verify the situation at the time of the accidental ingestion, as previously mentioned, it is possible that the packaging was left open or damaged because the container was difficult to open.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
References
i A review of 4652 exposures to liquid laundry detergent capsules reported to the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service 2008–2018
ii Product Stewardship Programme (PSP) for Liquid Detergent Capsules.
iii Retained EU legislation Commission Regulation (EU) No 1297/2014 amending Part 3 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
iv Study on hazardous detergents mixtures contained in soluble packaging for single use ('LiquiCaps Study')
v Take Action Today, Put Them Away campaign
vi RoSPA Take Action Campaign presentation
vii (Covey, H. C. (1993). A return to infancy: Old age and the second childhood in history. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 36, 81–90) viii The fundamental standards - Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk)
ix https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng46
x https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/adult-social-care/storing-medicines-care-homes xi https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199976
xii https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_056.pdf xiii Retained EU legislation Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 Article 35 Para 2
xiv Retained EU legislation Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 Article 69 Para 1
2 October 2024
UKCPI response to the Coroner’s Prevention of Future Deaths report – Elizabeth Van Der Drift
The UK Cleaning Products Industry Association (UKCPI) is the leading trade association representing UK producers of cleaning and hygiene products used in the home as well as in industrial and institutional workplaces.
Our UK members manufacture soaps, detergents, dish wash, laundry, air care products, surface cleaners, polishes and disinfectants including sanitisers. Products that – perhaps uniquely – are used in every home, in every workplace, every day, by everyone to provide the clean, safe and hygienic environment we take for granted.
As a trade association we work in partnership with our stakeholders including policy makers, the public and the media, to inform discussions about cleanliness, hygiene and sustainable cleaning and to ensure that our products are used safely and as intended. We were saddened to hear of Elizabeth Van Der Drift’s accidental death and the circumstances in which this happened. This is especially so given the purpose of our products is to enhance and provide a safe home or workplace for families and individuals.
This tragic accident is extremely rare. The National Poisons Information Service or NPIS receive approximately 40,000 telephone enquiries per year. Typically 8% of enquiries per year involve adults aged > 74 years.
The majority of these exposures (>80%) involve medicines, with household products accounting for <10% of exposures. Of these 300 exposures per year 78% involve washing up liquid, anti-bacterial or disinfectant products, 10% kettle descalers, 6.5% laundry powders and liquids and 5% (or 15 exposures) are attributable to laundry capsules and dishwash tablets. In approximately 2% of enquiries regarding patients in this age group (>74 years), a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s was documented, and dementia recorded in around 10%. Most exposures (85%) occur in the home and 12% in nursing/residential homes. NPIS has a classification (the PSS or Poisoning Severity Score) for assessing the severity of poisoning at the time of the enquiry. ‘Moderate’ toxicity is observed in 3% and ‘severe’ toxicity in a similar number of cases. The majority of exposures reported to the NPIS (>90%) result in no or minor clinical features only.
The circumstances in which this accident happened was described (media reports) as ‘assisted living’ and could provide laundering through a shared or communal laundry room. If this was the case it would likely have been unsupervised, where the product might have been easily available especially if the packaging was not secured properly after use or stored safely. What this data highlights is that accidental exposures occur from a range of household products and reinforces our approach to raise awareness of the need for safe storage of all cleaning and hygiene products.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
What follows is a short background and review on liquid capsules safe use and then our proposed action addressing the concern of safe storage of household cleaning products including laundry capsules in the elderly / dementia sufferer environment.
Liquid laundry detergent capsules (LLDC) - background
a. LLDC are a single or unit dose of detergent contained in a water-soluble film. They most commonly contain a mix of anionic and non-ionic surfactants together with solvents, colourants, fragrance and other ingredients such as enzymes in biological products.
b. LLDC enable the user to accurately dose for a laundry wash (one capsule per load) to avoid overdosing and are in a soluble format for use at low temperature to reduce energy use.
c. They are therefore seen as a convenient and sustainable laundry washing product with over a billion capsules sold annually in the UK alone. They have been on the UK market since 2000.
d. However, as their popularity increased there were a small number of accidental exposures, mostly involving young children. Although the majority of those exposed to liquid laundry detergent capsules were asymptomatic or suffered only minor clinical features after exposure, a small proportion required a hospital visiti. Reference: NPIS Clinical Tox 2017 paper
e. There have been no known UK infant fatalities due to these exposures and almost all were the result of unintended access to the product in the home, i.e. either the capsule container was left open and / or stored in an easily accessible location for an unsupervised infant.
Ensuring safe use and preventing infant accidents
a. Due to growing concern by the industry over the accidental exposures, in 2012 AISE, the European trade association for detergent manufacturers, established its own voluntary set of safety measures. This is named the Product Stewardship Programme (PSP) for Liquid Detergent Capsulesii.
b. These safety measures were quickly adopted by all EU capsule manufacturers, including in the UK, and require manufacturers to:
i. ensure the outer packaging is obscure or opaque
ii. modify the closures to an industry standard to impede the access by infants
iii. provide icons and safe use messages prominently on the outer packaging by use of a visible industry-wide safety icon and panel – examples below for both pouches and box packaging:
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
iv. adopt an advertising code of conduct and industry-wide safety message in brand communication including broadcast
v. Maintain a dedicated web-based campaign namely
c. In 2014, this then became the template for adoption into EU legislation; the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation or CLP.iii This added further protective measures such as imposing a minimum resistance of the soluble film membrane, retaining its liquid content for at least 30 seconds when the soluble packaging is placed in water at 20°C and adding an aversive bittering agent ‘which elicits oral repulsive behaviour within a maximum of 6 seconds’. The industry’s own PSP programme was retained as it goes beyond the regulatory requirement in areas of on pack communication and advertising.
d. In 2014, AISE carried out a large-scale prospective research study in collaboration with five Poison Centres, to help better understand accident circumstances and thus to confirm that the most appropriate measures are taken to address any safety concerns. It found that since the introduction of the industry’s PSP, the number of incidents reported to the Poison Centres have decreased on average by 32% and that the preliminary findings of the data indicate that unsafe storage was the main cause of accidents involving children.
e. In 2017, the European Commission produced a final report on Detergent Mixtures in Soluble Packaging (the ‘LiquiCaps’ study’)iv to study i) LLDC safety, ii) the impact of measures on LLDC safety and iii) appraise possible additional safety measures. The report in full can be found here, but in summary it also concluded that the majority of accidental exposures occurred when the products were easily accessible by children in the home.
f. In the UK, and in addition to the above voluntary and regulatory requirements, we established a home safety campaign with RoSPA (The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents), to promote safe storage in the home.
‘Take Action Today’v is a communications and awareness programme delivered through existing home visit programmes aimed at families with new babies and / or families in areas of deprivation known to have high rates of infant accidents.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
It is now in its 11th year with over 50 regional launches taking the safe storage message directly into over 700,000 families to help prevent poisoning accidents in the home. The professional home visitor has a simple checklist to go through with the parent and there is a kitchen ‘magnetic’ leave behind with safe storage messages. The campaign has been hugely successful in reducing hospital admissions due to accidental exposures amongst infants by 45% for period 2022/23 and 50% for 2023/24 (NHS data provided by RoSPA). Detailed campaign presentation can be found here.vi
Extrapolation of measures to reduce infant accidents to the elderly/dementia sufferer
There is a significant overlap in the cognitive state of young children and that of elderly dementia sufferers which is best described as an “absence of inhibition”, or said differently, an absence of risk awareness around the house. (Covey, H. C. (1993). A return to infancy: Old age and the second childhood in history. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 36, 81–90)vii
This similarity could allow us to extrapolate the conclusions of the research and campaigning with parents of infants to carers / care managers of cognitively impaired persons/dementia sufferers.
We know that infants build up their inhibitions about what to put into their mouth and what not to put in their mouth by experience, hence initially many items are explored by mouth. For dementia sufferers, as the disease progresses they often lose these learned inhibitions and / or the ability to distinguish hazardous materials from non-hazardous such as foodstuffs.
This loss of inhibition can be gradual, intermittent i.e. extremely difficult to predict and as manufacturers have no control over the product use in the user environment, so the role of the care giver becomes critical in ensuring that the user environment is safe.
The measures industry currently takes, both regulatory and voluntary, mean that the product itself and the packaging it is in is inherently safe and the likelihood of accidental ingestion should be extremely low for all age groups.
Our ‘Take Action Today’ campaign aims to make the home environment safe for infants which means ensuring that the parent is suitably informed about safe use and safe storage.
This approach could be applied to the care environment and has the added benefit that it also helps remind and therefore prevent accidental exposure to other cleaning product types (acid and bleach based corrosive cleaners) as well as other substances such as medicines.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
Proposed action
The industry has demonstrated that it is prepared to take appropriate and proportionate action to ensure the safe use of its products.
As described above, we have had and continue to have a leading role in addressing infant accidental exposure in the home and believe this experience can be applied with similar success in the elderly / dementia care environment.
Our actions laid out below are quick to deliver, reliable in terms of ongoing impact, applicable to the safe storage of all cleaning products (such as bleaches and disinfectants etc), reinforce the message for the safe storage of other products such as medicines and are proportionate to the level of accidental exposure currently being recorded.
Speaking to the CQC and charities including RoSPA, Age UK, Dementia UK and The Alzheimer's Society, there does not seem to be any clear guidance on the safe use or storage of cleaning chemicals in a care environment - be that in the home of a sufferer or in a care home setting (unlike for medicines). There is The fundamental standards - Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk)viii which apply to all registered care facilities regulated by the CQC in England. Included in the standards is ‘premises and equipment’ and this includes ensuring that premises are safe, and so can include care homes responsibilities on safety around the home on chemical storage etc.
It is relevant to note that responses to our Keep Caps From Kids website include emails from elderly consumers (often with reduced hand strength or arthritis) complaining about the difficulty in opening laundry containers (and having to resort to knives and scissors) and they admit that they do not reclose the hard to open containers.
We know that the majority of large care and residential homes will have professional laundering and cleaning services on or off site and the likelihood of patients accessing hazardous products is minimal.
However, in the smaller establishments, assisted living, independent living and ultimately in the home of say an early-stage dementia sufferer we believe that risks of accidental exposure can be best managed and minimised by ensuring that the care giver has greater awareness of safe use and storage of household chemicals. NPIS data shows that 80% of accidental exposures occur in the homes of the elderly <74yrs.
There is already an established requirement for the safe use and storage of medicines with regulation (Medicines Act 1968) and guidance (NICEix and CQCx) existing to ensure effective storage in a lockable cupboard for example.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
However, guidance on providing a safe environment tends to be general in nature and not specific to avoid accidental exposure to household cleaning products, including LLDC. For example:
me_dementia_friendly.pdf
As previously described, UKCPI has a longstanding and successful national campaign delivered by RoSPA targeting families with infants.
‘Take Action Today’ aims to reduce accidents amongst children under 5 by ensuring parents understand how to use and store safely all household cleaning products (including laundry capsules), to prevent infant access, i.e. the campaign builds on the safety measures already built into the product and product packaging and addresses the home environment where the cleaning products are used.
We believe that in partnership with the appropriate agencies or charities we could research, develop and tailor such a campaign to target care givers in assisted living, independent living, care homes, residential care and in the home of the sufferer to ensure that they are fully aware of the need to ensure safe and secure storage of household cleaning products including LLDC.
Our action would be to explore how such a campaign could be executed with industry support and delivered through organisations such as the CQC and charities such as RoSPA, Age UK, Dementia UK and The Alzheimer’s Society, all of whom we have already had preliminary discussions.
Such a campaign would deliver a broad range of reduced risk not just of accidental ingestion but also skin and eye damage from all household products as well as other products categories such as medicines and garden chemicals.
We would expect to be able to report back within 12 months on campaign messages, delivery partners and how to measure impact.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
Annex The Coroner’s concerns
a. The Coroner specifically references LLDC ‘as being colourful and potentially sweet-like in their appearance’. The bright colour of capsules was also claimed to be a factor in infant poisonings and led to a body of research workxi and an EU Commission reportxii concluding that there was no discernible colour preference when infants were exposed to a range of coloured household laundry products.
Also, an inquest only recently reported that a male dementia sufferer died after pouring a liquid laundry product on his breakfast cereal. The detergent was purple so unlikely to be confused with milk/foodstuff. This would support the view that it is not colour but simply a dementia sufferer’s inability, at some point in their disease progression, to distinguish between hazardous and non-hazardous materials. UK legislation specifically requires manufacturers to avoid any confusion over their product use, for example: Under CLP there is a provision that “Packaging containing a hazardous substance or a mixture supplied to the general public shall not have either a shape or design likely to attract or arouse the active curiosity of children or to mislead consumers, or have a similar presentation or a design used for foodstuff or animal feeding stuff or medicinal or cosmetic products, which would mislead consumers.”xiii Under the Biocidal Products Regulation; “In addition, products which may be mistaken for food, including drink, or feed shall be packaged to minimise the likelihood of such a mistake being made. If they are available to the general public, they shall contain components to discourage their consumption and, in particular, shall not be attractive to children.”xiv Finally, it should be noted that as far as the industry is aware there have been no successful cases brought against any cleaning product including laundry under the criteria of The Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations 1989. The regulation looks at the form, odour, colour, appearance, packaging, labelling, volume or size when determining if it is imitating a food.
b. The Coroner specifically mentions ‘no obvious design feature, in terms of the packaging, that makes accessing the content particularly difficult’. This is confusing given the various measure previously described required under CLP.
I have requested and received samples of the pouch packaging for this SKU and can confirm that it is fully compliant with the requirements of GB CLP Regulation and industry PSP.
Whilst unable to verify the situation at the time of the accidental ingestion, as previously mentioned, it is possible that the packaging was left open or damaged because the container was difficult to open.
c/o Allen Accountancy, 13 Gwenfro Units, Wrexham, LL13 7YP 07843 199397 ukcpi@ukcpi.org www.ukcpi.org
References
i A review of 4652 exposures to liquid laundry detergent capsules reported to the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service 2008–2018
ii Product Stewardship Programme (PSP) for Liquid Detergent Capsules.
iii Retained EU legislation Commission Regulation (EU) No 1297/2014 amending Part 3 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
iv Study on hazardous detergents mixtures contained in soluble packaging for single use ('LiquiCaps Study')
v Take Action Today, Put Them Away campaign
vi RoSPA Take Action Campaign presentation
vii (Covey, H. C. (1993). A return to infancy: Old age and the second childhood in history. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 36, 81–90) viii The fundamental standards - Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk)
ix https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng46
x https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/adult-social-care/storing-medicines-care-homes xi https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199976
xii https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_056.pdf xiii Retained EU legislation Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 Article 35 Para 2
xiv Retained EU legislation Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 Article 69 Para 1
Response received
View full response
Dear Ian Potter, Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths Report Elizabeth Van Der-Drift
Thank you for sending me your Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report, dated 13 August 2024, following your investigation and inquest into the death of Elizabeth Van Der-Drift who died on 19th March 2024.
I was very sorry to hear of Ms Van Der-Drift’s death. If you have the opportunity, please do pass on my deepest sympathies to her family and friends.
I know that you have also written to the Department for Health and Social Care, which I understand has asked the Health and Safety Executive to respond on the issues that fall within their purview, and the UK Cleaning Products Industry Association (UKCPI). I have therefore, focussed my response on the areas within OPSS’ area of responsibility.
As you will know, the UK’s product safety laws require that only safe consumer products be placed on the market. Manufacturers or importers have obligations to ensure their products are safe. In addition, distributors must not supply products they know, or should know, are unsafe. OPSS has not been made aware of any evidence to suggest that the pods were non- compliant with relevant product safety rules, or did not meet the requirements in relation to the chemical substances the laundry pods contained.
In considering the issues raised in your report we, like you, have considered the requirements of the Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations 1989. The requirements extend to products in scope that any person, including but not restricted to children, could ingest, causing harm. The exact details of how Ms Van Der-Drift came to access the laundry pods, leading to this tragic incident, are unclear. OPSS is only aware of one other case on record where a person suffering from dementia has ingested a similar type of product leading to a similar outcome. I therefore do not think that an amendment to the Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations or its supporting guidance, to include laundry pods within their scope, would be a proportionate response to this incident.
However, other legislation, such as the Chemicals Classification Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulations (2008), is in place to help protect vulnerable individuals from mistakenly
ingesting the products such as laundry pods, by requiring manufacturers to take reasonable steps to provide that protection. I know that the Health and Safety Executive, who have ownership of CLP, will be responding to you separately on the consideration of whether the CLP requirements have been met.
I can assure you that where appropriate we will continue work with and through other agencies to address safety issues where we identify breaches of existing legislation or where there are concerns around packaging that leads to an unacceptable risk to consumers and vulnerable groups.
As part of this the OPSS has spoken to the UKCPI to obtain further insight into industry views and actions they might be able to take. I understand that the UKCPI is exploring a new awareness campaign dedicated to providing information for those with caring or safeguarding responsibilities.
OPSS will ensure that this campaign is promoted to local regulators across the UK, through our relationships with Trading Standards in Great Britain and Environmental Health in Northern Ireland.
Thank you for sending me your Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report, dated 13 August 2024, following your investigation and inquest into the death of Elizabeth Van Der-Drift who died on 19th March 2024.
I was very sorry to hear of Ms Van Der-Drift’s death. If you have the opportunity, please do pass on my deepest sympathies to her family and friends.
I know that you have also written to the Department for Health and Social Care, which I understand has asked the Health and Safety Executive to respond on the issues that fall within their purview, and the UK Cleaning Products Industry Association (UKCPI). I have therefore, focussed my response on the areas within OPSS’ area of responsibility.
As you will know, the UK’s product safety laws require that only safe consumer products be placed on the market. Manufacturers or importers have obligations to ensure their products are safe. In addition, distributors must not supply products they know, or should know, are unsafe. OPSS has not been made aware of any evidence to suggest that the pods were non- compliant with relevant product safety rules, or did not meet the requirements in relation to the chemical substances the laundry pods contained.
In considering the issues raised in your report we, like you, have considered the requirements of the Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations 1989. The requirements extend to products in scope that any person, including but not restricted to children, could ingest, causing harm. The exact details of how Ms Van Der-Drift came to access the laundry pods, leading to this tragic incident, are unclear. OPSS is only aware of one other case on record where a person suffering from dementia has ingested a similar type of product leading to a similar outcome. I therefore do not think that an amendment to the Food Imitations (Safety) Regulations or its supporting guidance, to include laundry pods within their scope, would be a proportionate response to this incident.
However, other legislation, such as the Chemicals Classification Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulations (2008), is in place to help protect vulnerable individuals from mistakenly
ingesting the products such as laundry pods, by requiring manufacturers to take reasonable steps to provide that protection. I know that the Health and Safety Executive, who have ownership of CLP, will be responding to you separately on the consideration of whether the CLP requirements have been met.
I can assure you that where appropriate we will continue work with and through other agencies to address safety issues where we identify breaches of existing legislation or where there are concerns around packaging that leads to an unacceptable risk to consumers and vulnerable groups.
As part of this the OPSS has spoken to the UKCPI to obtain further insight into industry views and actions they might be able to take. I understand that the UKCPI is exploring a new awareness campaign dedicated to providing information for those with caring or safeguarding responsibilities.
OPSS will ensure that this campaign is promoted to local regulators across the UK, through our relationships with Trading Standards in Great Britain and Environmental Health in Northern Ireland.
Response received
View full response
Dear Sir,
Regulation 28 Report
We refer to your Regulation 28 Report and respond to the matters of concern in your report in that:
1. The product in question, Sainsbury’s Tropical Escape Bio Laundry Capsules, due to its eye- catching colours, appearance, and packaging, is being confused with food and risks being accidently ingested by those with dementia or other cognitive impairment (as well as children).
Sainsbury’s and their suppliers adhere to the A.I.S.E. Liquid Detergent Capsule Product Stewardship Programme (LDC PSP) guidance in this area. For over 30 years, A.I.S.E. have made continual commitments on product safety that go beyond legislation and have launched a range of voluntary initiatives to engage with consumers and professional users on safe and sustainable habits, use and disposal of products and packaging. This voluntary product safety initiative includes guidance for retailers and producers of detergent capsules, which aims to support safe use and storage of LDCs by consumers to significantly reduce the incidence of accidental exposure to these products, in particular involving young children.
Brands and own brand retailers participating in the LDC PSP commit to:
1. applying a prominent and readily visible safe use patch (also referred to as the “Yellow Patch”) on all LDC packaging as well as the industry’s safe use icons keep out of reach of children”, accompanied by the sentence: ‘Keep away from children’ (recommended) or the P102 sentence ‘Keep out of reach of children’, 2) the appropriate A.I.S.E. icon “close the pack”, accompanied by the sentence: ‘Close the lid properly’ (for tubs) or ‘Close the bag properly’ (for stand-up pouches), 3) the title “HANDLE AND STORE SAFELY” (preferably in capital letters), 4) The statement: “©A.I.S.E.” statement, 5) The URL: www.keepcapsfromkids.eu.
2. a closure of superior child-impeding efficacy.
3. measures to reduce the visibility of LDC through the product packaging: opaque packaging; obscure packaging; or any equivalent.
In addition, the capsules have Bitrex (a bittering agent that is activated on contact with the tongue) included in the capsule film to deter ingestion. The labelling below was included on our packaging in line with the AISE:
Registered in England & Wales. Company registration number: 3261722
As a responsible retailer, we take the safety of consumers seriously and are sorry to learn of this incident.
2. There was no safety feature observed on the packaging that made accessing the content particularly difficult, which increases the risk of accidental or inadvertent ingestion.
We do not accept that there was no safety feature on the packaging. The product in question was contained in a Doypack with a child-impeding closure. However, the Doypack or carton closures are only a deterrent if they are properly closed and in line with the AISE protocol the first advice is always close properly and keep out of reach, both of which statements are on our products in picture and word formats.
We have since changed our packaging to remove plastic packaging to a cardboard box with a child impeding closure. The new cardboard box has undergone testing in line with the AISE Test Protocol for Child-Impeding Closures (CIC) and the product continues to meet the LDC PSP guidance.
We trust the above satisfies you that our packaging does meets the appropriate safety standards and demonstrates that no further action is required beyond that already detailed.
Regulation 28 Report
We refer to your Regulation 28 Report and respond to the matters of concern in your report in that:
1. The product in question, Sainsbury’s Tropical Escape Bio Laundry Capsules, due to its eye- catching colours, appearance, and packaging, is being confused with food and risks being accidently ingested by those with dementia or other cognitive impairment (as well as children).
Sainsbury’s and their suppliers adhere to the A.I.S.E. Liquid Detergent Capsule Product Stewardship Programme (LDC PSP) guidance in this area. For over 30 years, A.I.S.E. have made continual commitments on product safety that go beyond legislation and have launched a range of voluntary initiatives to engage with consumers and professional users on safe and sustainable habits, use and disposal of products and packaging. This voluntary product safety initiative includes guidance for retailers and producers of detergent capsules, which aims to support safe use and storage of LDCs by consumers to significantly reduce the incidence of accidental exposure to these products, in particular involving young children.
Brands and own brand retailers participating in the LDC PSP commit to:
1. applying a prominent and readily visible safe use patch (also referred to as the “Yellow Patch”) on all LDC packaging as well as the industry’s safe use icons keep out of reach of children”, accompanied by the sentence: ‘Keep away from children’ (recommended) or the P102 sentence ‘Keep out of reach of children’, 2) the appropriate A.I.S.E. icon “close the pack”, accompanied by the sentence: ‘Close the lid properly’ (for tubs) or ‘Close the bag properly’ (for stand-up pouches), 3) the title “HANDLE AND STORE SAFELY” (preferably in capital letters), 4) The statement: “©A.I.S.E.” statement, 5) The URL: www.keepcapsfromkids.eu.
2. a closure of superior child-impeding efficacy.
3. measures to reduce the visibility of LDC through the product packaging: opaque packaging; obscure packaging; or any equivalent.
In addition, the capsules have Bitrex (a bittering agent that is activated on contact with the tongue) included in the capsule film to deter ingestion. The labelling below was included on our packaging in line with the AISE:
Registered in England & Wales. Company registration number: 3261722
As a responsible retailer, we take the safety of consumers seriously and are sorry to learn of this incident.
2. There was no safety feature observed on the packaging that made accessing the content particularly difficult, which increases the risk of accidental or inadvertent ingestion.
We do not accept that there was no safety feature on the packaging. The product in question was contained in a Doypack with a child-impeding closure. However, the Doypack or carton closures are only a deterrent if they are properly closed and in line with the AISE protocol the first advice is always close properly and keep out of reach, both of which statements are on our products in picture and word formats.
We have since changed our packaging to remove plastic packaging to a cardboard box with a child impeding closure. The new cardboard box has undergone testing in line with the AISE Test Protocol for Child-Impeding Closures (CIC) and the product continues to meet the LDC PSP guidance.
We trust the above satisfies you that our packaging does meets the appropriate safety standards and demonstrates that no further action is required beyond that already detailed.
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Ian Potter,
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report in relation to the death of Elizabeth Van Der-Drift, dated August 13th 2024. Your report was addressed to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and to the Office for Product Safety and Standards, but the report was transferred to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) from the Department of Health and Social Care. This was because your concerns touch on areas for which we have policy responsibility in respect of the classification, labelling and packaging of hazardous substances and mixtures (chemicals). I am aware that the Office of Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) will provide a separate response.
In considering this matter HSE has engaged with the relevant industry association (the UK Cleaning Products Industry Association, UKCPI) and officials from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), who have policy responsibility for the Detergents Regulations.
Before I address your concerns, may I take this opportunity to express my condolences to the family and friends of Ms Van Der-Drift regarding the tragic circumstances that gave rise to the report.
Your report highlights the following areas of concern for which HSE has responsibility: (i) laundry tablets/pods and their packaging are being produced in a way that, by virtue of their bright colouring, appearance, and packaging, they are being confused with food by people living with dementia or other cognitive impairment; and (ii) there is no obvious design feature, in terms of the packaging, that makes accessing the content particularly difficult for someone with even the most basic of manual dexterity. This response identifies the relevant regulatory provisions in the assimilated Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (‘the GB CLP Regulation’), with respect to the packaging of laundry tablets/pods for consumers (liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging for single use). The specific provisions, including guidance, are also set out in an Annex in this document. Engagement and Policy Division
Health & Safety Executive Mallard House 3 Peasholme Green York YO1 7PX
Tel: +
I hope this information addresses your concerns and reassures you as to the existing regulatory provisions that are in place on the design and safety features of the packaging of laundry tablets/pods for consumers.
Laundry tablets/pods and their packaging In 2015, a change was made to legislation to address concerns that laundry tablets/pods, and their packaging, were being produced in a way that makes them attractive by virtue of their bright colouring, appearance, and packaging. Additional safety measures were implemented for liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging to ensure better protection of the general public, especially children but also to protect other vulnerable groups, for example, those with learning disabilities or those living with dementia or other cognitive impairment.
This regulatory response was initiated to take action in resonse to a number of severe incidents of poisoning and eye damage involving children and other vulnerable groups, caused by liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging for single use.
According to Article 35(2) of the GB CLP Regulation, the supplier is responsible for taking all necessary steps to make sure that the design of the packaging is not attractive to children arouse their curiosity or to mislead consumers; the presentation of the packaging must not be a design used for foodstuff.
Design features of consumer laundry detergent packaging
Article 35(2) and section 3.3 of Annex II to the GB CLP Regulation set out the detailed legal requirements on the design of the packaging and the labelling of liquid consumer laundry detergents in dosages for single use contained in a soluble packaging.
Design features to ensure packing does not arouse the activty curiosity of children or other vulnerable groups to protect them include:
• making this type of product less visible by using opaque outer packaging;
• including an aversive agent (such as a bittering agent) in the soluble packaging to cause an immediate repulsive effect when in contact with the mouth; and
• rendering access to this type of product more difficult by making the soluble packaging more physically resistant (mechanical resistance and water dissolution).
Supplemental information is also highlighted on the label of the outer packaging of liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging for single use.
Matters of concern and details of action taken or proposed to be taken by HSE
Without knowledge of the full circumstances of the death or the identity of the specific laundry tablets/pods that Ms Van Der-Drift consumed, we are unable to comment on the extent to which the product in question may have been compliance with the packaging and labelling requirements for liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging in the GB CLP Regulation.
There are requirements related to design features in terms of the packaging of laundry tablets/pods to make accessing the contents more difficult. Even though the GB CLP Regulation does not specifically set out protective measures for those with dementia or cognitive disabilities as an explicit legal requirement, the secure
packaging and labelling requirements provide some mitigation in accessing the laundry tablets/pods.
Where an individual is unable to identify hazard communicated through the label, parents, support staff or carers for vulnerable persons should make that identification on their behalf and implement safeguarding measures for that individual, including restricting access through safe storage, whether in the home, residential care or care home.
HSE is not proposing additional provisions to the GB CLP Regulation but will continue to keep the position under review, including whether further regulatory measures might be needed. HSE will continue to work with bodies that enforce CLP, including trading standards and local authorities to address breaches of the regulation.
I hope this response helps to address the concerns set out in your report and explains our position.
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report in relation to the death of Elizabeth Van Der-Drift, dated August 13th 2024. Your report was addressed to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and to the Office for Product Safety and Standards, but the report was transferred to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) from the Department of Health and Social Care. This was because your concerns touch on areas for which we have policy responsibility in respect of the classification, labelling and packaging of hazardous substances and mixtures (chemicals). I am aware that the Office of Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) will provide a separate response.
In considering this matter HSE has engaged with the relevant industry association (the UK Cleaning Products Industry Association, UKCPI) and officials from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), who have policy responsibility for the Detergents Regulations.
Before I address your concerns, may I take this opportunity to express my condolences to the family and friends of Ms Van Der-Drift regarding the tragic circumstances that gave rise to the report.
Your report highlights the following areas of concern for which HSE has responsibility: (i) laundry tablets/pods and their packaging are being produced in a way that, by virtue of their bright colouring, appearance, and packaging, they are being confused with food by people living with dementia or other cognitive impairment; and (ii) there is no obvious design feature, in terms of the packaging, that makes accessing the content particularly difficult for someone with even the most basic of manual dexterity. This response identifies the relevant regulatory provisions in the assimilated Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (‘the GB CLP Regulation’), with respect to the packaging of laundry tablets/pods for consumers (liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging for single use). The specific provisions, including guidance, are also set out in an Annex in this document. Engagement and Policy Division
Health & Safety Executive Mallard House 3 Peasholme Green York YO1 7PX
Tel: +
I hope this information addresses your concerns and reassures you as to the existing regulatory provisions that are in place on the design and safety features of the packaging of laundry tablets/pods for consumers.
Laundry tablets/pods and their packaging In 2015, a change was made to legislation to address concerns that laundry tablets/pods, and their packaging, were being produced in a way that makes them attractive by virtue of their bright colouring, appearance, and packaging. Additional safety measures were implemented for liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging to ensure better protection of the general public, especially children but also to protect other vulnerable groups, for example, those with learning disabilities or those living with dementia or other cognitive impairment.
This regulatory response was initiated to take action in resonse to a number of severe incidents of poisoning and eye damage involving children and other vulnerable groups, caused by liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging for single use.
According to Article 35(2) of the GB CLP Regulation, the supplier is responsible for taking all necessary steps to make sure that the design of the packaging is not attractive to children arouse their curiosity or to mislead consumers; the presentation of the packaging must not be a design used for foodstuff.
Design features of consumer laundry detergent packaging
Article 35(2) and section 3.3 of Annex II to the GB CLP Regulation set out the detailed legal requirements on the design of the packaging and the labelling of liquid consumer laundry detergents in dosages for single use contained in a soluble packaging.
Design features to ensure packing does not arouse the activty curiosity of children or other vulnerable groups to protect them include:
• making this type of product less visible by using opaque outer packaging;
• including an aversive agent (such as a bittering agent) in the soluble packaging to cause an immediate repulsive effect when in contact with the mouth; and
• rendering access to this type of product more difficult by making the soluble packaging more physically resistant (mechanical resistance and water dissolution).
Supplemental information is also highlighted on the label of the outer packaging of liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging for single use.
Matters of concern and details of action taken or proposed to be taken by HSE
Without knowledge of the full circumstances of the death or the identity of the specific laundry tablets/pods that Ms Van Der-Drift consumed, we are unable to comment on the extent to which the product in question may have been compliance with the packaging and labelling requirements for liquid consumer laundry detergents in soluble packaging in the GB CLP Regulation.
There are requirements related to design features in terms of the packaging of laundry tablets/pods to make accessing the contents more difficult. Even though the GB CLP Regulation does not specifically set out protective measures for those with dementia or cognitive disabilities as an explicit legal requirement, the secure
packaging and labelling requirements provide some mitigation in accessing the laundry tablets/pods.
Where an individual is unable to identify hazard communicated through the label, parents, support staff or carers for vulnerable persons should make that identification on their behalf and implement safeguarding measures for that individual, including restricting access through safe storage, whether in the home, residential care or care home.
HSE is not proposing additional provisions to the GB CLP Regulation but will continue to keep the position under review, including whether further regulatory measures might be needed. HSE will continue to work with bodies that enforce CLP, including trading standards and local authorities to address breaches of the regulation.
I hope this response helps to address the concerns set out in your report and explains our position.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 21 March 2024, an investigation was commenced into the death of ELIZABETH VAN DER-DRIFT, then aged 93 years. The investigation concluded at the end of inquest heard by me on 1 August 2024.
The inquest concluded with a short-form conclusion of accidental death. The medical cause of death was:
1a aspiration pneumonia 1b ingestion of toxic substance (laundry detergent) 1c dementia
The inquest concluded with a short-form conclusion of accidental death. The medical cause of death was:
1a aspiration pneumonia 1b ingestion of toxic substance (laundry detergent) 1c dementia
Circumstances of the Death
Ms Van Der-Drift had lived with dementia for a number of years. Her condition was such that she often could not recall when she last consumed food and she would often go in search of something to eat.
Sometime on the night of 13/14 March 2024, she gained access to laundry detergent tablets/pods that were brightly coloured. Given the nature of the packaging and the tablets/pods, I determined that, given her cognitive impairment as a result of the dementia, Ms Van Der-Drift likely believed that they were some form of sweet or confectionary. Having gained access to the tablets/pods, she bit into at least one of them. Shortly thereafter, Ms Van Der-Drift was found complaining of stomach pain and shortness of breath.
An ambulance conveyed Ms Van Der-Drift to hospital where, despite treatment, her condition deteriorated, and she died in hospital on 19 March 2024.
Sometime on the night of 13/14 March 2024, she gained access to laundry detergent tablets/pods that were brightly coloured. Given the nature of the packaging and the tablets/pods, I determined that, given her cognitive impairment as a result of the dementia, Ms Van Der-Drift likely believed that they were some form of sweet or confectionary. Having gained access to the tablets/pods, she bit into at least one of them. Shortly thereafter, Ms Van Der-Drift was found complaining of stomach pain and shortness of breath.
An ambulance conveyed Ms Van Der-Drift to hospital where, despite treatment, her condition deteriorated, and she died in hospital on 19 March 2024.
Copies Sent To
Drift
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Review CCTV monitoring SIA licence requirements
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unregulated recreation safety
Establish standard for event healthcare services
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unregulated recreation safety
Mandatory Ambulance Liaison Officer at events
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unregulated recreation safety
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.