Peter Jeffery
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0501
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 14 Nov 2024
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
2 of 1
56-Day Deadline
14 Nov 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
Whilst there are multiple signs in existence at the location, not all of these are for public safety, some focus on more ‘administrative’ matters such as the closure of gates and the prohibition of parking on the jetty. Whilst this issues are undoubtedly important in the smooth administration of the public space, the consequences of such are not life threatening and the size and prominence of such administrative signs and surprising when compared with the signage that conveys potentially life-saving information.
I am concerned that the risks posed by entering the water (which appear equal to, if not greater than, the risks posed by the mud and sand) are not prominently and clearly displayed to those who lack local knowledge, especially out of ‘season’. This may cause people to misinterpret or underestimate the dangers posed by the undercurrent and rip-tides which, of course, are under the surface of the water and so not immediately obvious or visible.
As such people may continue to make ill-advised decisions to enter the water; water which has the power and ability to overwhelm even the strongest of adult swimmers within seconds.
I am concerned that the risks posed by entering the water (which appear equal to, if not greater than, the risks posed by the mud and sand) are not prominently and clearly displayed to those who lack local knowledge, especially out of ‘season’. This may cause people to misinterpret or underestimate the dangers posed by the undercurrent and rip-tides which, of course, are under the surface of the water and so not immediately obvious or visible.
As such people may continue to make ill-advised decisions to enter the water; water which has the power and ability to overwhelm even the strongest of adult swimmers within seconds.
Responses
Somerset Council is installing additional prominent safety signage at Burnham on Sea Jetty, including signs at the entrance highlighting strong currents and line painting on the lower jetty advising against access due to dangerous currents. This work is due to be completed by 30 November 2024.
AI summary
View full response
Dear Mrs Marsh,
Report to Prevent Future Deaths case reference: 17900868
Thank you for your letter and investigative report (dated 19th September 2024) into the sad death of Peter Ivor Jeffery, which was made in accordance with Paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. In providing this response to the Report, we offer our sincere condolences to Mr Jeffery’s family. Action to Address Concerns Raised On behalf of Somerset Council, I now want to outline our response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths concerning the death of Mr Jeffery (“the Report”), which identified matters of concern and recommended that action be taken to prevent future deaths. The matters of concern identified by the Coroner are outlined below: “Whilst there are multiple signs in existence at the location, not all of these are for public safety, some focus on more ‘administrative’ matters such as the closure of gates and the prohibition of parking on the jetty. Whilst this issues are undoubtedly important in the smooth administration of the public space, the consequences of such are not life threatening and the size and prominence of such administrative signs and surprising when compared with the signage that conveys potentially life-saving information.
I am concerned that the risks posed by entering the water (which appear equal to, if not greater than, the risks posed by the mud and sand) are not prominently and clearly displayed to those who lack local knowledge, especially out of ‘season’. This may cause people to misinterpret or underestimate the dangers posed by the undercurrent and rip-
tides which, of course, are under the surface of the water and so not immediately obvious or visible.
As such people may continue to make ill-advised decisions to enter the water; water which has the power and ability to overwhelm even the strongest of adult swimmers within seconds.”
Somerset Council has reviewed the provision of safety signage at Burnham on Sea Jetty. In order to address the concerns that have been raised Somerset Council is installing additional safety signage at Burnham on Sea Jetty. This new signage specifically and clearly highlights the risks associated with the strong currents that occur around the jetty. This signage is to be displayed prominently at the entrance to the jetty. In addition, line painting is being completed on the lower part of the jetty advising against access stating “Dangerous Currents no Access” I have attached below a copy of the signage to be installed at the entrance to the jetty.
The work has been ordered and the signs and line painting are due to be installed on or before the 30th November 2024. Once the signage and line painting have been completed a further update will be issued to the Coroner with photographs of the signage in place. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Report to Prevent Future Deaths case reference: 17900868
Thank you for your letter and investigative report (dated 19th September 2024) into the sad death of Peter Ivor Jeffery, which was made in accordance with Paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. In providing this response to the Report, we offer our sincere condolences to Mr Jeffery’s family. Action to Address Concerns Raised On behalf of Somerset Council, I now want to outline our response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths concerning the death of Mr Jeffery (“the Report”), which identified matters of concern and recommended that action be taken to prevent future deaths. The matters of concern identified by the Coroner are outlined below: “Whilst there are multiple signs in existence at the location, not all of these are for public safety, some focus on more ‘administrative’ matters such as the closure of gates and the prohibition of parking on the jetty. Whilst this issues are undoubtedly important in the smooth administration of the public space, the consequences of such are not life threatening and the size and prominence of such administrative signs and surprising when compared with the signage that conveys potentially life-saving information.
I am concerned that the risks posed by entering the water (which appear equal to, if not greater than, the risks posed by the mud and sand) are not prominently and clearly displayed to those who lack local knowledge, especially out of ‘season’. This may cause people to misinterpret or underestimate the dangers posed by the undercurrent and rip-
tides which, of course, are under the surface of the water and so not immediately obvious or visible.
As such people may continue to make ill-advised decisions to enter the water; water which has the power and ability to overwhelm even the strongest of adult swimmers within seconds.”
Somerset Council has reviewed the provision of safety signage at Burnham on Sea Jetty. In order to address the concerns that have been raised Somerset Council is installing additional safety signage at Burnham on Sea Jetty. This new signage specifically and clearly highlights the risks associated with the strong currents that occur around the jetty. This signage is to be displayed prominently at the entrance to the jetty. In addition, line painting is being completed on the lower part of the jetty advising against access stating “Dangerous Currents no Access” I have attached below a copy of the signage to be installed at the entrance to the jetty.
The work has been ordered and the signs and line painting are due to be installed on or before the 30th November 2024. Once the signage and line painting have been completed a further update will be issued to the Coroner with photographs of the signage in place. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Somerset Council has completed the installation of additional public safety signage at Burnham on Sea Jetty in November 2024. This includes new signs at the top of the jetty and line-marked signage on the tarmacked surface to prominently highlight dangerous currents.
AI summary
View full response
Dear Mrs Marsh,
Report to Prevent Future Deaths case reference: 17900868
I refer to my letter dated the 11 November 2024. As discussed in my letter of the 11 November 2024 I have attached below details of the signage installed at the Jetty in Burnham on Sea. This work was completed in November 2024. This has involved signage being installed at the top of the jetty and line marked signage being applied to the tarmacked surface
I have attached below photographs of the signage at the jetty.
Please accept my apologies for not sending this information earlier I have had a period of illness towards the end of November 2024 and have only recently returned to work. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Report to Prevent Future Deaths case reference: 17900868
I refer to my letter dated the 11 November 2024. As discussed in my letter of the 11 November 2024 I have attached below details of the signage installed at the Jetty in Burnham on Sea. This work was completed in November 2024. This has involved signage being installed at the top of the jetty and line marked signage being applied to the tarmacked surface
I have attached below photographs of the signage at the jetty.
Please accept my apologies for not sending this information earlier I have had a period of illness towards the end of November 2024 and have only recently returned to work. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 13th November 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Peter Ivor Jeffery. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 10th September 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was death by Misadventure.
The medical cause of death was: Ia) Drowning.
I record that “Peter Ivor Jeffery, aged 68, jumped into the water by the jetty at Burnham on Sea beach around 3.30pm on the afternoon of Sunday 29th October 2023 to assist a stranger and her dog who were in distress in the water. He was fully clothed in jeans, trainers and a snug boiler suit, which negatively impacted on his ability to swim. Peter got caught in a riptide and was unable to be rescued by those on the beach. This section of water is known to be particularly treacherous. Peter’s body was discovered near to Stert Island on the 12th November 2023.”
The medical cause of death was: Ia) Drowning.
I record that “Peter Ivor Jeffery, aged 68, jumped into the water by the jetty at Burnham on Sea beach around 3.30pm on the afternoon of Sunday 29th October 2023 to assist a stranger and her dog who were in distress in the water. He was fully clothed in jeans, trainers and a snug boiler suit, which negatively impacted on his ability to swim. Peter got caught in a riptide and was unable to be rescued by those on the beach. This section of water is known to be particularly treacherous. Peter’s body was discovered near to Stert Island on the 12th November 2023.”
Circumstances of the Death
Peter Ivor Jeffery (“Peter”) was a relatively strong, fit and healthy 68 year old man. On the afternoon of the 29th October 2023, Peter went to the jetty at Burnham-on-Sea, somewhere that he’d been to previously and was reasonably familiar with, having been there before at different times and so he had experienced that part of the coast in different weather and seasonal conditions; although he had never been in the water, only observing the tide from the shore, which was something that he liked to do. Whilst at the jetty on this occasion, Peter noticed a woman (a complete stranger to him) and her dog who were in difficulty in the water; the dog had entered the water and got into difficulty and so its owner had gone in after it, also finding herself in difficulty. The lady had never been to this location before and was not familiar with it as she resides in another part of the country.
Peter, without hesitation, jumped into the water to try and help but was immediately overcome by the water. He went under. There were differing witness account as to whether or not he resurfaced shortly after entering the water but, if he did, it was not more than once.
An off-duty emergency service personnel and the specialist rescue service personnel (who by coincidence were at the scene) both declined to enter the water without appropriate safety measures as they were aware of the dangers posed by the current and tip tides in this area and were aware that they would have been putting their own lives at risk by doing so.
The specialist rescue personnel gave evidence from his eighteen years of experience of this part of the coastline that the tide/under-current can sweep a grown man away in seconds as the water has the power to drag them under and there is no time to do anything about it, it doesn’t matter how strong an individual is or how competent they are in the water.
Peter was not seen again and a coastal search was coordinated to try and locate his body. He was eventually located some two weeks later near to Stert Island.
I admitted pictorial evidence showing the signage that is currently displayed on the walls and railings at the entrance to the Jetty. These showed or conveyed the following messages: (i) A warning about the potential risk posed by the sinking sand; (ii) A warning not to park a vehicle on the jetty; (iii) A warning that the gates to the jetty may be closed during high tide; (iv) Signs displaying varying warning triangles; this does include warnings about the mud, sinking sand and risks posed by the tide.
Evidence was admitted by the rescue personnel that this area of water is known to be notorious amongst locals.
I heard that signage and/or flags are displayed at the beach to advise against swimming in certain stretches of that part of the coast, but that these are only displayed in peak/summer season, and this incident happened out of season and so no flags or additional signage was in place.
Peter, without hesitation, jumped into the water to try and help but was immediately overcome by the water. He went under. There were differing witness account as to whether or not he resurfaced shortly after entering the water but, if he did, it was not more than once.
An off-duty emergency service personnel and the specialist rescue service personnel (who by coincidence were at the scene) both declined to enter the water without appropriate safety measures as they were aware of the dangers posed by the current and tip tides in this area and were aware that they would have been putting their own lives at risk by doing so.
The specialist rescue personnel gave evidence from his eighteen years of experience of this part of the coastline that the tide/under-current can sweep a grown man away in seconds as the water has the power to drag them under and there is no time to do anything about it, it doesn’t matter how strong an individual is or how competent they are in the water.
Peter was not seen again and a coastal search was coordinated to try and locate his body. He was eventually located some two weeks later near to Stert Island.
I admitted pictorial evidence showing the signage that is currently displayed on the walls and railings at the entrance to the Jetty. These showed or conveyed the following messages: (i) A warning about the potential risk posed by the sinking sand; (ii) A warning not to park a vehicle on the jetty; (iii) A warning that the gates to the jetty may be closed during high tide; (iv) Signs displaying varying warning triangles; this does include warnings about the mud, sinking sand and risks posed by the tide.
Evidence was admitted by the rescue personnel that this area of water is known to be notorious amongst locals.
I heard that signage and/or flags are displayed at the beach to advise against swimming in certain stretches of that part of the coast, but that these are only displayed in peak/summer season, and this incident happened out of season and so no flags or additional signage was in place.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Remove all spikes and inward-facing constructions from perimeter and radial fences
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Limit perimeter fencing height to a maximum of 2.2 metres
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Provide sufficient 1.1-metre wide gates in perimeter fences for emergency evacuation
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Paint and mark all emergency gates in fences with "Emergency Exit
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Keep all perimeter fence gates to pitch unlocked and open during matches
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Annually inspect all crush barriers for corrosion; repair or replace as needed
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.