Nicola Norman
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2023-0097Deceased
No published response · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
9 May 2023
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Matters Of Concern
1. That SPA contacts are not routinely discussed with a supervising clinician, ss should have but did not happen in Ms Norman's case, where mental health symptoms and especially where suicidality is raised by the caller.
Action Should Be Taken
It is for each addressee to respond to matters relevant to them.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 27th April 2021, 22nd and 23rd November 2022, evidence was heard touching the death of Nicola Norman. She had died on 20th January 2020, aged 42 years. Medical Cause of Death 1 (a) Asphyxia (b) Suspension by neck How, when, where the deceased came by her death: Nicola had a 20 year history of mental illness and had been diagnosed with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder. From around November of 2019 she suffered a sharp decline, developing depression, anxiety and somatisation. Between December 2019 and January 2020she self-harmed on multiple occasions. Despite care of the primary health services and secondary health services, 20/01/2020 at approximately 10:30, she was found dead hanging at her mother's address and recognised life extinct by the London Ambulance Service. There were no suspicious circumstances. Conclusion of the Coroner as to the death: She took her own life whilst suffering severe and enduring mental illness. Circumstances of the death. Extensive evidence was taken and accepted by the court. In summary, of relevance to this report:
On 21/12/2019 Ms Norman called the Single Point of Access (SPA) in a highly anxious state and informed the operative that she had had enough of life and felt like burden. Ms Norman then disconnected the call. There was no FU by SPA On 31/12/2019, Ms Norman spoke to the Single Point of Access (SPA) and informed them that she had taken an overdose and cut her wrists in front of her son. No suicidality assessment nor clinical assessment was undertaken by the SPA operative that she spoke to and she was simply told to ring primary care mental health services, as she was already under their care. She was not put through to this service by SPA, nor were any concerns about her passed on by SPA to any other service, including no concerns being passed by SPA to her GP. Each of these calls were answered by administrators with no clinical qualifications. Evidence was taken in court from the Service Manager representing SPA on these matters. Calls are apparently taken initially by non-clinical staff. They should call back if cut off as on 21/12/2019, and now "warm transfer" calls such as that of the 31/12/2019 to the service already providing care to the caller. Matters of Concern
1. That SPA contacts are not routinely discussed with a supervising clinician, ss should have but did not happen in Ms Norman's case, where mental health symptoms and especially where suicidality is raised by the caller.
2. That such calls are not routinely passed on to a suitably qualified clinician able to undertake mental health assessment and assess risk for the patient.
3. That SPA contacts are not routinely notified to the patient's GP and any mental health services providing care for the patient.
On 21/12/2019 Ms Norman called the Single Point of Access (SPA) in a highly anxious state and informed the operative that she had had enough of life and felt like burden. Ms Norman then disconnected the call. There was no FU by SPA On 31/12/2019, Ms Norman spoke to the Single Point of Access (SPA) and informed them that she had taken an overdose and cut her wrists in front of her son. No suicidality assessment nor clinical assessment was undertaken by the SPA operative that she spoke to and she was simply told to ring primary care mental health services, as she was already under their care. She was not put through to this service by SPA, nor were any concerns about her passed on by SPA to any other service, including no concerns being passed by SPA to her GP. Each of these calls were answered by administrators with no clinical qualifications. Evidence was taken in court from the Service Manager representing SPA on these matters. Calls are apparently taken initially by non-clinical staff. They should call back if cut off as on 21/12/2019, and now "warm transfer" calls such as that of the 31/12/2019 to the service already providing care to the caller. Matters of Concern
1. That SPA contacts are not routinely discussed with a supervising clinician, ss should have but did not happen in Ms Norman's case, where mental health symptoms and especially where suicidality is raised by the caller.
2. That such calls are not routinely passed on to a suitably qualified clinician able to undertake mental health assessment and assess risk for the patient.
3. That SPA contacts are not routinely notified to the patient's GP and any mental health services providing care for the patient.
Copies Sent To
Litir:iation Manager CNWL Cnw
tr. inquestscnwl@nhs.net
SPA Service Manager, CNWL
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Cross-Administration Patient Safety Coordination
Infected Blood Inquiry
Poor health and social care integration
Central Delivery with Devolved Support
Infected Blood Inquiry
Poor health and social care integration
Multi-Trust Mortality Meeting Engagement
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Poor health and social care integration
Commissioner for Survivors of Institutional Childhood Abuse (COSICA)
HIA Inquiry
Poor health and social care integration
Establish partner Trust buddying arrangement
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Poor health and social care integration
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.