James Fitzpatrick
PFD Report
Response Pending
Ref: 2026-0087
14 days left · 0 of 4 responded
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
0 of 4
56-Day Deadline
9 Apr 2026
14 days left to respond
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
(1) There is a lack of written national guidance on how handovers between Doctors, Nurses and support staff should be undertaken either when a patient is moved between wards or hospitals, or when there is the handover to staff starting a shift who will be taking over the care of the person. Whilst it is acknowledged that each Trust has different policies and procedures in place, there is no generic national guidance to assist in ensuring relevant, pertinent and critical information is passed on to those who will be caring for the patient.
(2) Evidence was provided that national guidance currently exists in England and Wales for handovers relating to emergency care in acute hospitals, however there is no other guidance for other healthcare settings as to what a handover should include or how it should be undertaken.
(3) Within DHUFT there is a lack of written guidance or policy as to how handovers should be undertaken and recorded by those working within the Trust.
(4) Two weeks prior to his death, Jim was moved to another ward within Alderney Hospital. There was a verbal handover undertaken which was recorded in the electronic patient records. No written handover was provided. The patient records referred to him being a “high risk of choking” and “on an unofficial soft diet”. This information was not true and was not recorded anywhere else in his records or risk assessments.
(5) Further evidence was given that at the time of Jim’s death there were a number of agency workers at Alderney Hospital, and they would rely on information provided to them at the start of their shift during the handover as they would not have time to go through each patient’s records to appraise themselves of the patient’s history and risks. A daily written handover sheet was provided at the beginning of each shift which would be updated during the day, however from the daily handover sheet provided to the Court for the day of Jim’s death, pertinent general information about Jim was missing from that handover sheet.
(6) The lack of written local and national guidance on the handover of a patient’s care creates a risk that incorrect or incomplete information can be passed to those caring for an individual which may impact upon the patient’s care and may lead to a future death.
“6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action.
(2) Evidence was provided that national guidance currently exists in England and Wales for handovers relating to emergency care in acute hospitals, however there is no other guidance for other healthcare settings as to what a handover should include or how it should be undertaken.
(3) Within DHUFT there is a lack of written guidance or policy as to how handovers should be undertaken and recorded by those working within the Trust.
(4) Two weeks prior to his death, Jim was moved to another ward within Alderney Hospital. There was a verbal handover undertaken which was recorded in the electronic patient records. No written handover was provided. The patient records referred to him being a “high risk of choking” and “on an unofficial soft diet”. This information was not true and was not recorded anywhere else in his records or risk assessments.
(5) Further evidence was given that at the time of Jim’s death there were a number of agency workers at Alderney Hospital, and they would rely on information provided to them at the start of their shift during the handover as they would not have time to go through each patient’s records to appraise themselves of the patient’s history and risks. A daily written handover sheet was provided at the beginning of each shift which would be updated during the day, however from the daily handover sheet provided to the Court for the day of Jim’s death, pertinent general information about Jim was missing from that handover sheet.
(6) The lack of written local and national guidance on the handover of a patient’s care creates a risk that incorrect or incomplete information can be passed to those caring for an individual which may impact upon the patient’s care and may lead to a future death.
“6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 23rd February 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death of James Fitzpatrick, born on the 5th June 1934, who was aged 89 years at the time of his death. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 30th January 2026. The medical cause of death was:
Ia Ischaemic Strokes Ib Severe Atherosclerosis
II Airway obstruction from food material
The conclusion of the Inquest was a narrative conclusion that James Fitzpatrick died as a consequence of naturally occurring disease, exacerbated by airway obstruction by food material.
Ia Ischaemic Strokes Ib Severe Atherosclerosis
II Airway obstruction from food material
The conclusion of the Inquest was a narrative conclusion that James Fitzpatrick died as a consequence of naturally occurring disease, exacerbated by airway obstruction by food material.
Circumstances of the Death
Jim was an 89-year-old gentleman with a history of decompensated heart failure and respiratory illness who at the time of his death was a patient on St Brelades Ward, Alderney Hospital, Poole, which is a mental health inpatient unit. At the time of his death, he was not detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 but was the subject of a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Authorisation.
At some point between 2.30pm and 3pm on the 14th February 2024 Jim was in the lounge area on the ward when he was witnessed to eat a scone by a visitor to the ward. At approximately 3pm Jim was sitting in a chair in the lounge when he started to cough, was then witnessed to jerk as if having a fit and became unresponsive. Staff responded to his collapse, and he was transferred to his room for further care. Food material, which was thick, creamy and stringy was removed from his mouth. It is not possible to determine if this was regurgitated food material or food material Jim was eating at the time of his collapse. His condition did not improve, and his death was confirmed at 3.10pm.
At some point between 2.30pm and 3pm on the 14th February 2024 Jim was in the lounge area on the ward when he was witnessed to eat a scone by a visitor to the ward. At approximately 3pm Jim was sitting in a chair in the lounge when he started to cough, was then witnessed to jerk as if having a fit and became unresponsive. Staff responded to his collapse, and he was transferred to his room for further care. Food material, which was thick, creamy and stringy was removed from his mouth. It is not possible to determine if this was regurgitated food material or food material Jim was eating at the time of his collapse. His condition did not improve, and his death was confirmed at 3.10pm.
Copies Sent To
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Increase driver briefing frequency with safety as primary agenda item
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Staff rota communication
Establish and apply criteria for signallers exceeding maximum 72-hour work week
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Staff rota communication
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.