Anna Masson

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2016-0108
Date of Report 15 March 2016
Coroner G A Short
Coroner Area Central Hampshire
Response Deadline est. 10 May 2016
All 1 response received · Deadline: 10 May 2016
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 10 May 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroners Concerns
_ (1) received the Trust's Root Cause Analysis Report relating to the treatment of routine referrals by general practitioners which disclosed a recently introduced screening pathway process_ The evidence showed that screening potential service users is conducted by relatively junior members of staff and my concern is whether this process is robust enough to identify those who need urgent treatment.

(2) It was unclear from the evidence given whether the screening pathway applied only to the local community mental health team or across all equivalent teams employed by the Trust: consider that there should be a consistent practise in all teams Coroner's Office; Castle Hill, The Castle; Winchester, S023 8UL Tel 01962-667884 Fax 01962-667893
Responses
Southern Health NHS Trust
15 Mar 2016
Response received
View full response
Dear Sir Regulation 28 Report Anna Macfie Masson write further to the above issued on 15 March 2016, following the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Anna Masson. note your areas of concerns, which will address in turn, are as follows: received the Trust's Root Cause Analysis Report relating to the treatment of routine referrals by general practitioners which disclosed a recently introduced screening pathway process_ The evidence showed that screening potential service users is conducted by relatively junior members of staff and my concern is whether this process is robust enough to identify those who need urgent treatment As part of the work identified during the investigation into the death of Mrs Masson, and following receipt of the Regulation 28 report the Trust has looked at the screening processes in all Adult Community Mental Health Teams (CMHT) and has identified that there is some variation across the Trust in terms of their screening processes. Consequently we have been working to review the CMHT Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to ensure that a standard process is followed consistently across in all teams in the future to ensure the skill and expertise of those staff undertaking the screening is appropriate and that all decisions are agreed via a multi-disciplinary team discussion, Following completion of work to standardise the process we will undertake a randomised audit across the CMHTs to ensure governance around the screening process_ We anticipate that this will be completed in September 2016. 2 It was unclear from the evidence given whether the screening pathway applied only to the community mental health team or across all equivalent teams employed by the Trust consider there should be a consistent practise in all teams Trust Headquarters Sterne Road, Tatchbury Mount; Calmore, Southampton S040 2RZ May Mary

can confirm that the same approach in terms of the screening pathway will apply across all Adult Community Mental Health Teams as currently already do within Older Persons Mental Health Teams _ This process will also give clarity to the expectation as to when patient will be seen_ dependent on the assessment of the referral. The detail of this is below: Urgent referrals: Screened within four hours, seen within 24 hours IlI, Soon referrals: Screened within day, seen within 10 days III; Routine referrals: Screened with 2 seen with weeks Any referrals that are deemed urgent will be sent on to the Acute Mental Health Teams for urgent prioritisation as per the adult mental health pathway: This process was followed with Mrs Masson
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you Southern Health have the power to take such action_
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 19/11/2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Anna Mary Macfie Masson, aged 67_ The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 14 March 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide
Circumstances of the Death
determined that Anna Masson was suffering from depression. On 17 November 2015 she went to Micheldever railway station and at about 09.42 she jumped into the path of a non-stopping fast train passing through the station. She died due to Multiple Injuries
Copies Sent To
667884 01962 667893 Fa*
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Close HSS Dispute Resolution Procedure when HSSA opens
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Postgraduate training governance clarity
Fuller Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion Performance Benchmarking
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion 2024 Review Progress
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion Outcome Framework
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
NHSBT Transfusion Outcome Funding
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Blood Tracking Systems Funding
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
National Haemophilia Database Support
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Single Core Data Set
IICSA
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Single consultant data repository
Paterson Inquiry
Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.