Joyce Rumming

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2017-0182
Date of Report 6 June 2017
Coroner David Ridley
Response Deadline est. 29 September 2017
All 1 response received · Deadline: 29 Sep 2017
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 29 Sep 2017
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroners Concerns
Helpfully a Route Cause Analysis was undertaken which highlighted as a care service delivery problem the fact that an antibiotic, Amoxicillin, in respect of which it was believed that Joyce was allergic to following a previous allergic reaction had been given to her shortly before her death. The Route Cause Analysis in relation to items (bullet points) under contributory factors documents a number of areas that give rise for concern: essentially amounts to right hand not communicating with the left hand in that for example unless a Doctor looks in a specific location due to issues as regards the communication between various software packages that the existence of an allergic marker could easily be missed as was the situation in relation to Joyce's case: A number of recommendations have been highlighted which have been documented at items 1-4 in the action plan: share the concerns highlighted by the Route Cause Analysis and the purpose of this Regulation 28 Report is to enable a mechanism whereby your Trust feeds back both to myself and to the family the results of the recommendations and provides details in respect of what changes will be made and if changes cannot be made as to why cannot be made. Proceeding in this way will allow the family to secure a full death certificate following discontinuance which will take place a few days after this Regulation 28 Report is sent out. have attached for ease of reference Appendix A which contains the 4 recommendations_
Responses
Great Western Hospital NHS Trust
11 Sep 2017
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Ridley Re: Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths Joyce Violet Rumming (deceased) Thank you for your letter addressed to dated 6 June 2017 where you had detailed recommendations for the This letter sets out the Trust's response to your report: The Trust takes patient safety seriously and has clinical risk processes in place to investigate cases where a patient had or could have suffered harm and to identify areas of potential learning: In your letter you opined that you had shared the same concerns which were identified in the Trust's own investigation (Root Cause Analysis). In this letter will endeavour to set out summary of the progress the Trust has made with the recommended actions in the Trust's own investigation: Action One Handover _process_between _the ambulance service and the_Trust In October 2016, the ambulance service changed from a handwritten record detailing patient care to an electronic system. With all new documentation it takes time to embed, the Emergency Department staff are now familiar with the new ambulance documentation The Clinical Risk team had liaised with the local ambulance trust to see whether any changes can be made to the electronic system so that key information, such as allergies, is at the top of the handover document. Our local ambulance trust works with many acute hospitals in South West We have been advised that it is not possible to make Values Service Teamwork Ambition Respect Trust: the region. Our

this change as the electronic system cannot be tailored for each individual organisation which the ambulation trust works with. There is future plan to introduce a joint IT system between ambulance trusts and hospitals and we understand that a pilot is scheduled in the next couple of years: Action Two Review of documentation of_ allergies The majority of documentation in the Emergency Department is electronic_ On the electronic patient record system there is an alert section where drug allergies are to be noted. The alert notification tab is then flagged red on the patient's home page_ The Emergency Department continuously review their documentation and there are future plans to implement new clinical note. The clinical note is an electronic record with specific questions for the clinician to answer when assessing the patient: The new clinical note is planned to include patient allergies. Action Three Explore_the_interface between IT systems The IT infrastructure did not and still does not support sharing of information between the electronic patient medication system and the electronic patient record system: Actions two and four are to bridge this gap and ensure patient safety: The Trust plans to explore the IT infrastructure further in the future relating to the interface between the two systems: In addition to this the Emergency Department are being migrated onto the same server which the rest of the Trust uses. This will make it easier for Emergency Department staff to have access to the electronic patient medication record to look up any allergies and with the potential to prescribe medication using this system: Action Four Review the allergy alert system process policy The Medications Safety Group has developed six factsheets relating to patient medication allergies The factsheets are available to all staff and are located on the Trust intranet. The factsheets cover the assessment of an allergy, to document and share this information and how to treat the patient: The six factsheets are included with this letter for your information: The policy is currently being drafted however in the interim the factsheets provide adequate guidance on allergies hope that this provides you with assurance that the Trust has measures into place to improve systems around patient allergies. Our Values Service Teamwork Ambition Respect how put

If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me:
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:
Report Sections
Circumstances of the Death
Joyce had arrived at the Accident and Emergency Department of The Great Western Hospital late on the 11 December 2016, she was alert and orientated and appeared to respond clearly to questioning: She had previously been diagnosed with a chest infection in respect of which she had recently completed a course of antibiotics The Ambulance Acute Referral Form identified that Joyce was allergic to Amoxicillin but it does not appear that this was conveyed to those in the Emergency Department room at handover. The allergy does not appear to have been picked up by the Emergency Department room staff when considering the Ambulance Acute Care Referral Form. Shortly before midnight one of the nurses in consultation with the patient's son and husband present documented an allergy to Amoxicillin on the reverse of the Care Joyce, to confuse matters had also stated to another nurse when asked that she had no allergies although there appears to have been a concern that she may have been concerned. Doctor having checked the internal Medway System and
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient Records Audit
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Blood Test Result Documentation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Recording Clinical Discussions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Detainee Capture and Condition Records
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Medical Fitness for Detention Forms
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
CDI patient information
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient records compliance audit
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
CDI patient observations records
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.