Martin Baker
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2018-0130
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 26 Aug 2018
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
26 Aug 2018
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns
_ [BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) It was accepted in evidence that there had been a lack of communication with the family: had not been involved in any psychiatric reviews instead, on one occassion, a consultant was left to rely upon information provided by a junior healthcare assistant: At inquest expressed my view that where a patient has signed a consent form authorising discussion of relevant Derriford Park, Derriford Business Park; Plymouth, PL6 SQZ Tel 01752 204636 Fax The drug fizzy They events with the family, the default position should be that there will be involvement of the family in the absence of any reason not to do SO, for example, a patient's subsequent express instruction not to share something with the family: In this case the family were unaware that Mr Baker had been discharged from psychiatric support and were unaware of what to do in the event of deterioration in Mr Baker's condition: (2) It was also accepted in evidence that at the time of these events there was a shortage of care coordinators something described as "very far from ideal ' was advised that this situation has now been corrected. Nevertheless, it was the clear view of the family, which accepted, that in the absence both of a care coordinator and the involvement of the family there had been no one to act as an advocate on Mr Baker's behalf_something that had been to his detriment.
(3) It was accepted in evidence by that his risk assessment failed to address periodic impulsivity that Mr Baker demonstrated. found this was not causative of the death: Nevertheless , felt this was a point of learning that may well have a bearing in the care of future patients and felt it appropriate to bring it to your attention:
(3) It was accepted in evidence by that his risk assessment failed to address periodic impulsivity that Mr Baker demonstrated. found this was not causative of the death: Nevertheless , felt this was a point of learning that may well have a bearing in the care of future patients and felt it appropriate to bring it to your attention:
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Arrow Re: Martin Glyn Baker, DOB 30.03.68 Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Further Deaths In response to the outcome of this case and your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Further Deaths a meeting was held between senior managers from Bath and North East Somerset Council (the B&NES Council) and Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (the AWP Trust) to agree joint approach to address the learning from Mr Baker's death. Within the Bath and North East Somerset local authority area mental health provision is delivered through integrated teams where AWP Trust and B&NES Council staff work alongside each other under a heads of agreement arrangement: However; B&NES Council acknowledges the request within the Regulation 28 Report for the Council to accept responsibility for responding to the recommendations made An action plan to deal with each of the points in the Regulation 28 Report has been prepared by Karyn Yee-King, Principal Mental Health Social Worker for BeNES Council. This details how B&NES Council and AWP Trust will approach each of the points you identified. AWP Trust colleagues have contributed to the drafting of this plan and have agreed the final version: It specifies the actions that we will take in the B&NES local authority area, which agency will take the lead and provides a timeframe for completion of actions 0 CSE H 4 Bath and North East Somerset - The place to Iive work and visit
NS Bath & North East Bath and North East Somerset Somerset Council Clinical Commissioning Group The action plan also incorporates additional learning not documented in the Regulation 28 Report: Finally; the plan also indicates how we will monitor the effectiveness of the changes made Please find a copy of the action plan attached; hope that the actions identified respond Sufficiently robustly to the concerns identified in your report: Please do not hesitate to sontact me regarding any further information you require or if you want a progress update report at a later stage.
NS Bath & North East Bath and North East Somerset Somerset Council Clinical Commissioning Group The action plan also incorporates additional learning not documented in the Regulation 28 Report: Finally; the plan also indicates how we will monitor the effectiveness of the changes made Please find a copy of the action plan attached; hope that the actions identified respond Sufficiently robustly to the concerns identified in your report: Please do not hesitate to sontact me regarding any further information you require or if you want a progress update report at a later stage.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 9 September 2016, commenced an investigation into the death of Martin Glyn Baker, then aged 48 investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19 April 2018. The conclusion of the inquest was prescription drug-related death: It is likely Mr Baker suffered from a slow metabolism which caused potentially toxic levels of venlafaxine, prescribed to him, to build up Together with a deteriorating physical condition and mild myocardial scarring found at post-mortem, it is likely this induced a fatal cardiac arrhythmia: The medical cause of death was given as Ia) toxicity
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Baker suffered with mental health issues for over 20 years. He had previously attempted suicide on a number of occasions. After a failed attempt to take his own life following a jump from height he fractured his spine and was left confined to a wheelchair. Psychiatric support for Mr Baker was provided through Livewell South-west and heard at inquest fromi and both of whom saw the deceased: Prior to the deterioration in Mr Baker s condition that led to his demise_ had decided to stop a prescription of lithium: This was as a consequence of excessive thirst complained about by Mr Baker which, in turn, led to the consumntion pf a large number of drinks and resulted in problems with urinary incontinence was unaware, at the time of his decision_that there had been earlier failed attempts t0 siop the lithium prescribed to Mr Baker_ was also unaware that Mr Baker had signed a form of consent authorising Livewell South-west to discuss care arrangements made_for_him with his family:
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Computerise system for managing missing persons and casualty information
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Extend computerisation to all police forces for shared information access
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Establish common telephone numbers for public major incident information
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Review railway emergency planning, including survivor after-care and bereaved support
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Ensure readily available designated and trained Family Liaison Officers at local level
Macpherson Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Include racism awareness and cultural diversity training for Family Liaison Officers
Macpherson Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.