Patricia Cragg

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2018-0255
Date of Report 23 August 2018
Coroner Andrew Cox
Response Deadline ✓ from report 20 October 2018
All 1 response received · Deadline: 20 Oct 2018
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 20 Oct 2018
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
_ (1) There was a lack of available C resource_to deal with the two simultaneous sets of emergencies: The inquest heard from who_accepted this had been recognised_ Derriford Park, Derriford Business Park; Plymouth, PL6 5QZ Tel 01752 204636 Fax Artery artery five weakness for a considerable period of time was advised that there were two potential courses of action that could be adopted to overcome this difficulty. First, there could be a second on-call consultant radiologist available to assist the first on-call consultant at times of particularly high demand. Secondly, there could be a facility to open up and run a second CT scanner. This would require the presence of the whole range of staff to include radiographers, porters, et cetera. was told this was the second time in recent years where there had been simultaneous emergencies that inevitably meant there was a in reporting a patient's condition: It seems a decision is required as to whether it is appropriate to allocate additional resource to CT imaging and if so how that additional resource should be deployed in times of unexpected high demand: (2) was told that the radiology department did not have its own internal major incident policy setting out how to respond to situations like that involving Mrs Cragg: linformed me that this was piece of work he was trying to complete but that he would need input and assistance from his consultant colleagues before able to do so.
Responses
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
5 Oct 2018
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Arrow Re: Patricia CRAGG Thank you for your letter of 23 August 2018 and accompanying Regulation 28 report in relation to the aforementioned patient: You identified a number of Matters of Concern in your report which will respond to in order: There was a lack of available CT resource_to_deal with the two simultaneous sets of emergencies The inquest heard from who accepted this had been & recognised weakness for a considerable period 0r ime. was advised that there were two potential courses of action that could be adopted to overcome this difficulty. First, there could be second on-call consultant radiologist available to assist the first on-call consultant at times of particularly high demand. Secondly, there could be facility to open up and run the second CT scanner: This would require the presence of the whole range of staff to include radiographers, porters, et cetera: was told this was the second time in recent years where there had been simultaneous emergencies that inevitably meant there was in reporting the patient's condition. It seems decision is required as to whether it is ERoru: Working in partnership with the Peninsula Medical School Chairman: Richard Crompton Chief Executive: Ann James O1saD delay

appropriate to allocate additional resource to CT imaging and how that additional resource in should be deployed in cases of unexpected high demand: We have new Emergency Department CT scanner. This is an additional CT scanner. During office hours it rapidly deals with Trauma cases and new emergencies. During out of hours it deals with all on call emergencies. This has not increased the number of scanners available at night; but has significantly improved access and throughput 2 There has been culture change in terms of radiology registrar to consultant radiologist communication: The registrars have been encouraged (they were never discouraged) to engage from the on call consultant at times of high work activity that exceeds their capability (for instance multiple trauma cases). This would improve patient flow and care: It would also reduce any delay ingetting new patients scanned: 3 There is 'WhatsApp' communication tool available to the on call radiology consultant to draft in additional reporting capacity in the event of multiple traumas that exceed reporting capacity.
4. are making plans to increase consultant presence at weekends and CT scanning capacity at weekends. 5_ With the staffing that we have, do not believe that we would be able to have second tier of on call staff available to open a second scanner at a moment's notice (minimum 2 staff) . Rather, we need to be more actively engaged in prioritisation of cases. We also need to remind clinical colleagues of the need to update the radiology team when patient status changes. was told that the radiology department did not have its own internal maior incident policy setting out how to respond to situations like that involving Mrs Cragg: informed me that this was a piece of work he was trying to complete but that he would need input and assistance from his consultant colleagues before being able to do so. We agree that this is a piece of work that would formalise some of what is described above and will receive full support in its formulation and implementation. We aim to have this ready by 31/12/18 and will share it with you when completed:.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action; Your RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report; namely by 20 October 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period: Your response must contain details of action taken Or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 6 February 2017 , commenced an investigation into the death of Patricia Cragg, then aged
74. The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 23 August 2018. The conclusion of the Inquest was that Mrs Cragg died from a known but rare complication of a necessary medical procedure. The medical cause of death was given as: 1a) Haemorrhage into Retro Peritoneum (Right Iliac Haemocele Device appropriately placed) 1b) Angiogram/Angioplasty Ic) Unstable Angina from Severe Three Vessel Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis
Circumstances of the Death
Mrs Cragg had known severe coronary disease. She was not felt to be suitable candidate for surgery: On 26 January 2017 she underwent a high-risk percutaneous intervention guided by intravascular ultrasound carried out by At the end of the procedure, the patient reported pain and it was suspected that she was bleeding from the arterial point of entry-The decision was quickly made that she required
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Ambulance trusts submit resource recommendations
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Sufficient resources for operational planning
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans Chronic healthcare staff shortages
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Pandemic Decision-Making Framework
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Leadership Succession Arrangements
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Central Emergency Taskforces
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Civil Contingencies Act Review
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Devolved Nations COBR Attendance
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Four Nations Pandemic Structure
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Vulnerable People Framework
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.