Kristopher McDowell
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2019-0083
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 4 Aug 2019
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
4 Aug 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroners Concerns
_ (a) The average space between the uprights on the parapet on the aqueduct is 195mm whilst the current industry standard is 11Omm as a result of which there exists a risk that a person might be able to pass between them_ This is a particular risk for children using the aqueduct but it is also a significant risk for young persons or adults being of sufficient width for them to pass through in circumstances whereby it was their intention to gain access to the non-pedestrian side of the parapet for a purpose which would not be considered the intended use of the structure In my opinion, the use of signage alone, warning users of the potential risk, does not adequately mitigate the risk of a person passing through the uprights and falling from the aqueduct. Coroner Olficc, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LLIS AIN Tel 01824 708047 Fa 01824 708048
(b) Evidence provided by an expert instructed by the Canal and River Trust (CRT) indicated that it was his belief that the upright became detached as a result of a lifting action which dis-engaged the nib on the bottom of the upright from the socket on the outside of the parapet: The evidence provided to the inquest by engineers from CRT advised that their inspection procedures provided for an Annual Inspection which included testing for the extent of embedment by a pushlpullllift test; however in my opinion the subjective elements of this test this would permit inconsistencies in the information which it provides Furthermore, exact measurements of the degree of embedment of uprights would only routinely be established in the course of a Principal Inspection which takes place twenty years and as a result it is difficult for there to be an accuratelregular assessment of the rates of possible deterioration and hence the true extent of embedment In my opinion, the testing processes currently adopted (in regard to the matters detailed above) are inadequate to ensure that the uprights are properly engaged at all times.
(b) Evidence provided by an expert instructed by the Canal and River Trust (CRT) indicated that it was his belief that the upright became detached as a result of a lifting action which dis-engaged the nib on the bottom of the upright from the socket on the outside of the parapet: The evidence provided to the inquest by engineers from CRT advised that their inspection procedures provided for an Annual Inspection which included testing for the extent of embedment by a pushlpullllift test; however in my opinion the subjective elements of this test this would permit inconsistencies in the information which it provides Furthermore, exact measurements of the degree of embedment of uprights would only routinely be established in the course of a Principal Inspection which takes place twenty years and as a result it is difficult for there to be an accuratelregular assessment of the rates of possible deterioration and hence the true extent of embedment In my opinion, the testing processes currently adopted (in regard to the matters detailed above) are inadequate to ensure that the uprights are properly engaged at all times.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Canal & River Trust, Ground Floor, Aqua House, 20 Lionel Street, Birmingham, B3 1AQ. T: 0303 040 4040 E: canalrivertrust.org.uk/contact-us Patron: H.R.H. The Prince of Wales. Canal & River Trust, a charitable company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales with company number 7807276 and registered charity number 1146792, registered office address First Floor North, Station House, 500 Elder Gate, Milton Keynes, MK9 1BB.
30 April 2019
For the Attention of: John Gittins Senior Coroner County Hall Wynnstay Road Ruthin LL15 1YN Sent by email: john.gittins@denbighshire.gov.uk The average space between the uprights on the parapet on the aqueduct is 195mm whilst the c Our Ref JS/SW/300419
2
3 We have started an investigation of the physical options available to address gaps between the upri For example, at Marple Aqueduct which was referred to at the Inquest, we undertook an informal publ At the conclusion of the informal public consultation the Trust will develop and then submit a final des The consenting process should take up to13 weeks once any design is submitted so we would expec Evidence provided by an expert instructed by the Canal and River Trust (CRT) [sic] indicated t
4
Chief Operations Officer Canal & River Trust
30 April 2019
For the Attention of: John Gittins Senior Coroner County Hall Wynnstay Road Ruthin LL15 1YN Sent by email: john.gittins@denbighshire.gov.uk The average space between the uprights on the parapet on the aqueduct is 195mm whilst the c Our Ref JS/SW/300419
2
3 We have started an investigation of the physical options available to address gaps between the upri For example, at Marple Aqueduct which was referred to at the Inquest, we undertook an informal publ At the conclusion of the informal public consultation the Trust will develop and then submit a final des The consenting process should take up to13 weeks once any design is submitted so we would expec Evidence provided by an expert instructed by the Canal and River Trust (CRT) [sic] indicated t
4
Chief Operations Officer Canal & River Trust
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 2nd of June 2016 commenced an investigation into the death of Kristopher John McDowell (DOB 5.12.1997 DOD 31.5.2016) The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 6lh of March 2019_ The conclusion of the jury at the inquest was one of death by misadventure, the Cause of Death being recorded as 1(a) Chest Trauma
Circumstances of the Death
On 31st of May 2016 whilst walking home from work with friends, the Deceased went through the uprights on the Pontcysyllte aqueduct bridge onto the non-pedestrian side whereby the upright rail that the Deceased was holding onto became detached and the Deceased fell from a height to his death
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Remove all spikes and inward-facing constructions from perimeter and radial fences
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Limit perimeter fencing height to a maximum of 2.2 metres
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Provide sufficient 1.1-metre wide gates in perimeter fences for emergency evacuation
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Paint and mark all emergency gates in fences with "Emergency Exit
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Keep all perimeter fence gates to pitch unlocked and open during matches
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Annually inspect all crush barriers for corrosion; repair or replace as needed
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.