Matthew Thomas Hamilton
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2013-0180
No published response · Over 2 years old
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
3 Oct 2013
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns
_ There is no barrier or restriction at the end of the footpath, such as are commonly found on footpaths or at school gatesThe pavement is only some Smetres wide. This and riding Way; iteans that children Whether on foot or otherwise can emerge suddenly into the line of traffic It was also noted that the taller at speed straight the vision of both footpath and road users. These metal fence and shrubbery restricts looked into, and some action might be taken represent hazards which should be to reduce the risk of future deaths_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe organisation have the power to take such action . your
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 2 September 2012 | commenced an investigation into the death of Matthew Thomas Hamilton. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 2 August 2013. The conclusion of the inquest was: - Ia) Neck and Chest Injuries due to Road Traffic Collision.
Circumstances of the Death
On the 2"d September 2012 the deceased was his pedal cycle on the footpath (No 109392) linking Harraby Grove and Brunel Carlisle. As he emerged onto Brunel Way he braked sharply as a car approached from his right: He was thrown over the handlebars. Both he and the cycle struck the side of the car. He sustained fatal injuries
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Revise signal sighting standard to explicitly consider signal readability
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define additional time required for reading gantry-mounted and complex signals
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "very short duration" definition within the signal sighting standard
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Identify and retrospectively review locations affected by "very short duration" ambiguity
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "overhead line equipment" in signal sighting standard to mean wires and droppers
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define acceptable limits for temporary signal obscuration in sighting standards
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.