Thomas Coyne

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2017-0207
Date of Report 19 January 2017
Coroner John Pollard
Coroner Area Cheshire
Response Deadline ✓ from report 20 March 2017
No published response · Over 2 years old
Sent To
Response Status
Responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 20 Mar 2017
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
The ​MATTERS OF CONCERN​ are as follows. –

I was informed by the representative of the British Transport police who gave evidence to me , that Northern Rail own the train which struck the deceased and they also own/manage Earlestown station.

Two matters of concern arose:-

1. The CCTV installed at the station and which can be monitored by the staff on duty, does not actually cover all the platform areas, and thus the member of staff could not see Mr Coyne (who was the only passenger on the station at the time) as he mistakenly wandered on to the tracks.
2. There is apparently absolutely no physical barrier of any kind at the end of platform three, thus allowing unfettered access to the tracks at that point.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 24th May 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of Thomas Coyne born 8th August 1959. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18th January 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was one of Accidental Death with the medical cause being 1a Multiple Injuries.
Circumstances of the Death
On the 21st May 2016 the deceased attended a stag party and consumed a quantity of alcohol. He was later making his way home when he inadvertently entered Earlestown Railway station. He wandered across all three platforms and then progressed along platform three, down the unprotected slope, and on to the lines. a short time thereafter he was struck by a passing train as he walked along the left hand cess.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Replace Buried Metallic LPG Pipes
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
New LPG Safety Regime
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
LPG Supplier Registration
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Polyethylene Piping Research
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Limit perimeter fencing height to a maximum of 2.2 metres
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Paint and mark all emergency gates in fences with "Emergency Exit
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Keep all perimeter fence gates to pitch unlocked and open during matches
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Annually inspect all crush barriers for corrosion; repair or replace as needed
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.