Rachel Edwards
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0220
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 24 Apr 2018
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
24 Apr 2018
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner's Concerns AI summary
The report describes the circumstances of a death from overdose but does not detail specific coroner's concerns regarding systemic failures or future death risks.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Mr Parsley Re: Regulation 28 report following the inquest of Ms Rachel Edwards I write in response to your report dated 27 February 2018. Under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 you requested the Trust consider issues of service delivery following the conclusion of the inquest into the sad death of Ms Edwards. I will address the matters you raised in the order received: Medication on discharge from hospital You raised the matter that Ms Edwards had a known risk of stockpiling medication. Despite this risk she was discharged from hospital with 14 days of medication, referred to at the inquest as standard practice. You explained further examination identified that the prescription for Tramadol was given for seven days indicating there had been some assessment of risk. The records were not clear what numbers had been given for each medication. You were concerned that individual consideration of the service user's needs and risks may not be consistent. Discharge from hospital is a known period of opportunity and risk for services users. It can represent a sign of the individual's recovery whilst also presenting new challenges. Each service user's journey through this period is different and requires a responsive individualised approach from the care team. The Trust will make an assessment of the medications prescribed upon discharge and this consideration will continue across the Trust. In the majority of situations an individual's recovery into the community is supported by a period of care with the Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment team. Separate but linked, the Trust has completed some exploratory work on examining deaths of our service users where prescribed medication is listed within the cause of death. This has shown that opioid medication has the highest prevalence, matching the national picture. The Trust supports the work of Public Health England and the Faculty of Pain Medicine in raising awareness of opioids, their benefits and uses, but also the risks associated with them. The Trust has raised the learning of the prevalence of opioids as a cause of death with its staff through its safety together newsletter and is completing a further thematic review of the deaths, in order to identify what additional learning may be made. This is being presented to the Trust's Mortality Review Group in May 2018. ~,•1..Working together Trust Headquarters: Hellesdon Hospital, Drayton High Road, Norwich NR6 5BE =~t- for better mental health
Notification to GPs of the prescribed medication upon discharge You raised the matter that there was no automated notification to the service user's GP of the type and amounts of prescribed medication issued at the point of discharge. This information is crucial to help reduce the potential of over prescribing. You heard that the current process involves human action through use of emails. There is a national programme looking to build these electronic bridges between different elements of the health system. Locally, the Trust is planning the technical changes required. At this time, there is no confirmed date for completion of this work. I would be pleased to update you on progress over time. Advocacy Your third point raised the matter that Ms Edwards' situation was heavily influenced by the physical pain she experienced. She received disappointing news regarding her pain management treatment, increasing her sense of hopelessness. You heard evidence that she did not have an advocate to support her. You stated that advocacy services provide support to people in need and that we should consider establishing a formal system for an advocate to be appointed, where this may be beneficial. The Trust supports the significant and valuable role that advocacy services provide. The Trust is established in working with advocacy services as part of statutory frameworks, such as the Mental Health Act, Mental Capacity Act and complaints regulations. Equally, the Trust works with advocacy services where this has been requested by the service user to support the best possible forms of communication and collaboration. Such services are not commissioned by the Trust and the process to access such are either through service user consent or under the guidance of the above named frameworks. The Trust will register this matter with its commissioners. Thank you for raising these matters. If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.
Notification to GPs of the prescribed medication upon discharge You raised the matter that there was no automated notification to the service user's GP of the type and amounts of prescribed medication issued at the point of discharge. This information is crucial to help reduce the potential of over prescribing. You heard that the current process involves human action through use of emails. There is a national programme looking to build these electronic bridges between different elements of the health system. Locally, the Trust is planning the technical changes required. At this time, there is no confirmed date for completion of this work. I would be pleased to update you on progress over time. Advocacy Your third point raised the matter that Ms Edwards' situation was heavily influenced by the physical pain she experienced. She received disappointing news regarding her pain management treatment, increasing her sense of hopelessness. You heard evidence that she did not have an advocate to support her. You stated that advocacy services provide support to people in need and that we should consider establishing a formal system for an advocate to be appointed, where this may be beneficial. The Trust supports the significant and valuable role that advocacy services provide. The Trust is established in working with advocacy services as part of statutory frameworks, such as the Mental Health Act, Mental Capacity Act and complaints regulations. Equally, the Trust works with advocacy services where this has been requested by the service user to support the best possible forms of communication and collaboration. Such services are not commissioned by the Trust and the process to access such are either through service user consent or under the guidance of the above named frameworks. The Trust will register this matter with its commissioners. Thank you for raising these matters. If I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 151h May 2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Rachel Holly Edwards. The lnvesffgation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 221><l February 2018, The conclusion of the Inquest was that Rachel Edwards died as the result of an overdose of her prescription medicines following a seven-year period of suffering from severe and unbearable pain, the result of injuries sustained in a fall from height in 2009. The medical cause of death was confirmed as: 1(a) Over dose of multiple drugs.
Circumstances of the Death
Rachel died on the 8th May 2017as the result of an over dose of multiple prescription medicines at her home address , Suffolk. A concerned friend had been unable to contact her when visiting Rachel's home and had called her family. Rachel's father Chris arrived al a short while later with a spare key to the property, entered and subsequently found his daughter fully clothed but unresponsive in the bath. The emergency services were called and upon arrival of a paramedic Rachel's death was recognised at 08.39 on the 81h May 2017.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Drug Prescription Documentation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Medication Contamination/Misadministration
Poor prescription security
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.