Patricia Walker

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2026-0044
Date of Report 28 January 2026
Coroner Sally Robinson
Response Deadline ✓ from report 25 March 2026
All 2 responses received · Deadline: 25 Mar 2026
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Suboptimal staffing levels on Ward 90, caused by recruitment difficulties, increase the risk of patient falls due to insufficient dedicated nursing care.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) Staffing was sub optimal and remain sub optimal on Ward 90 as recruitment is difficult which means that TAG nursing care is not always possible, and patients are at an increased risk of falls.
Responses
Hull University Teaching Hospital NHS / Health Body
27 Jan 2026
Action Taken
• The Trust has established daily operational controls to mitigate staffing pressures in real time. • Daily staffing meetings take place across all sites, where ward-level escalations relating to actual versus planned staffing, changes in acuity, and red flag indicators are reviewed by dedicated staffing representatives. • Information from these meetings feeds directly into twice-daily Trust-wide safe staffing meetings chaired by a Nurse Director, providing senior clinical oversight of staffing gaps, mitigations and risk management. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Assistant Coroner Robinson

Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Mrs Patricia Irene Walker

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 27 January 2026, issued following the inquest into the death of Mrs Patricia Irene Walker.

We again express our sincere condolences to Mrs Walker’s family.

We recognise the Coroner’s concern that staffing on Ward 90 was sub-optimal due to recruitment difficulty, meaning that “TAG nursing care is not always possible” and that patients are therefore at increased risk of falls.

While the concern is identified in relation to Ward 90, the Trust agrees that safe nurse staffing and the ability to deliver consistently high standards of fundamental care is a Trust-wide patient safety priority, particularly across inpatient wards where acuity, dependency and operational pressures have increased.

1) Summary of the Trust-wide actions taken

The Trust has established daily operational controls to mitigate staffing pressures in real time. Daily staffing meetings take place across all sites, where ward-level escalations relating to actual versus planned staffing, changes in acuity, and red flag indicators are reviewed by dedicated staffing representatives. These representatives cover all Trust sites, providing a consistent view of risk and enabling rapid redistribution of workforce to the highest priority areas.

Information from these meetings feeds directly into twice-daily Trust-wide safe staffing meetings chaired by a Nurse Director, providing senior clinical oversight of staffing gaps, mitigations and risk management. Subject matter specialists in enhanced care attend to advise on patients requiring enhanced observation, specialling or alternative care models, and site matrons attend to ensure alignment between staffing decisions, patient flow and operational pressures.

Our Ref: LS/KD/240326/L1

24 March 2026

Strictly Private and Confidential Miss Sally Robinson East Riding and Hull Coroners The Guildhall Alfred Gelder Street Hull HU1 2AA

Hull Royal Infirmary Anlaby Road Hull HU3 2JZ Email:

Out of hours, staffing escalations are directed to site matrons who provide senior clinical leadership 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and who review and authorise redeployment, temporary staffing requests and enhanced care arrangements during evenings, nights and weekends, ensuring continuous oversight and rapid response to any deterioration in staffing levels or patient acuity outside core hours.

In addition to the above, as part of a wider programme to strengthen safe staffing and reduce reliance on temporary mitigation, the Trust (as part of Humber Health Partnership) has undertaken a comprehensive safer staffing establishment review using recognised safer staffing tools (including the Safer Nursing Care Tool census approach) and triangulation with patient outcomes.

This work identified:
• There is a gap between baseline establishments and assessed requirements across inpatient areas (predominantly on the Hull Royal site), emergency departments, and some community nursing services when assessed against the available safer staffing tools; and that the Trust is in the bottom quartile nationally for CHPPD.
• a structured RAG prioritisation of areas for investment, using professional judgement and outcome triangulation.
• that funding the “red” areas would require investment, equating to 123.82 WTE, and that this is intended to support safer care delivery and reduce premium “bad cost” spend by moving to substantive recruitment where possible.

The review findings and recommendations were considered by the Trust Boards-in-Common, and the Boards approved the nursing establishment investment, including funding for red-rated areas as a priority for patient safety.

The Boards further agreed that, where the investment enables substantive recruitment into specific areas, bank and agency usage should reduce accordingly and will be monitored, with clear accountability where usage increases again.

2) Trust-wide approach to reducing falls risk and strengthening fundamental care delivery

The Trust recognises that low staffing levels and skill mix gaps can directly affect the ability to provide consistent fundamental care (including observation, rounding, toileting support, and timely response), which in turn can increase falls risk for frail patients.

Accordingly, the Trust-wide programme includes:
• Targeted investment in inpatient wards (prioritised via RAG) to strengthen day and night staffing, particularly non-registered workforce where gaps drive reliance on short-term mitigations.
• Reducing inappropriate 1:1 mitigations: the paper notes use of security bed watch staff for patients requiring one-to-one supervision, acknowledging this can be inappropriate and linked to reduced non-registered nursing capacity; the intention of investing in the non- registered workforce is to reduce reliance on this mitigation and improve patient experience.
• Standardised oversight of enhanced observation: all patients requiring security bed watch are assessed every 24 hours by a specialist registered nurse (7 days/week), with support to clinical areas to ensure patients are cared for in the most appropriate way.

• Strengthened staffing governance and assurance: the review work included an assurance site visit by the Regional NHS England team at Hull Royal Infirmary in November 2025, who were assured by the safe staffing processes undertaken to identify staffing requirements and recommendations.

3) How this addresses the Ward 90 concern

While the Trust’s actions are Trust-wide and intended to improve safety across multiple wards/services, the approved investment recommendations do include Ward H90, which is identified as SNCT Red with a recommended uplift the number of Health Care Assistant 12 hours per day.).

We hope this provides assurance that the Trust is not only addressing safe staffing at system level but is also implementing targeted improvements in the frailty ward setting relevant to the concerns.

4) Timetable for implementation (Trust-wide programme)

The Trust-wide programme will be implemented on a phased basis, prioritising areas assessed as “red” through the safer staffing review, and aligning investment to recruitment and affordability planning.

5) Monitoring and assurance

The Trust will monitor the impact of these actions through staffing and quality measures, triangulated with patient outcomes and incident learning, including temporary staffing usage, staffing fill rates, and patient safety indicators such as falls (including falls with harm), particularly across frailty wards.

The Boards have also agreed strengthened governance and reporting arrangements, including receipt of a safer staffing paper every six months, with the next report scheduled for April 2026. Future reports will include benchmarking against peers and KPIs to evidence the outcomes and benefits of the approved investment, including a baseline position and expected improvements following implementation.

The Executive Team will report to the Workforce, Education & Culture Committees-in-Common on how the staffing investment will be managed, including expectations around redeployment and the planned reduction and ongoing monitoring of bank and agency usage.

In closing, the Trust recognises the importance of the matters raised and is committed to providing assurance that safe staffing is being addressed both at ward level and across the wider organisation. The Board-approved Safer Nurse Staffing Establishment Review and associated governance actions provide a Trust-wide framework to identify risk, prioritise investment and strengthen establishments, supported by ongoing triangulation of staffing information with patient outcomes and incident learning.
NHS England NHS / Health Body
28 Jan 2026
Noted
NHS England stated the local staffing concerns for Ward 90 fall outside its usual role and remit, noting that Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is best placed to respond and has presented a business case to increase nursing staff. NHS England also disputed the clarity of the term “TAG nursing care.” (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Patricia Irene Walker

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 28th January 2026 concerning the death of Patricia Irene Walker (date of death not specified in the Report but in or around February 2025). In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Patricia’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Patricia’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raised concerns that staffing was sub optimal, and remains so, on Ward 90 at Hull Royal Infirmary as recruitment is difficult. This means that TAG nursing care is not always possible and patients are at an increased risk of falls.

We note that your Report has also been sent to Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, who would be best placed to respond to your concerns from a local perspective. NHS England has endeavoured to address your concerns as far as we are able to, but consider the issues in this case do fall outside of our usual role and remit. Staffing / recruitment concerns and TAG nursing care It is important to acknowledge that this incident occurred within a busy frailty ward where nurses and doctors must manage multiple acutely unwell patients. Although the term “TAG nursing care” was used in your Report, it is unclear exactly what this refers to as this has not been stated within your Report and NHS England was not a party to the inquest, and so has not heard any evidence on this particular issue. There are, as far as we are aware no nationally standardised or formally recognised definitions of TAG nursing care within NHS England, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance, or wider UK professional nursing literature. National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

3rd March 2026

For this response, ‘TAG’ has been understood as a locally defined model related to the abbreviation for a Triage Assessment and Goal setting approach that helps to identify and prioritise patients based on the severity of their illness, acute episode, or condition. NHS provider organisations have a statutory duty to ensure that services are staffed safely and appropriately to meet the clinical needs of patients. Each Trust or NHS organisation is responsible for its own recruitment and therefore any further queries in this regard will be better addressed by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Across all national guidance (see “Supporting Guidance” below), evidence demonstrates that inadequate staffing increases fall rates, delays detection of deterioration, and reduces the ability to deliver safe, preventative care. National frameworks highlight that safe staffing must be aligned to patient acuity (severity and urgency of a patient’s condition), dependency, and clinical risk, especially in high risk populations such as older adults with frailty. Frail older adults are at high risk of falls and prevention is a key nursing responsibility. Nurses should perform falls risk assessments on admission, and regularly thereafter, and implement the required nursing interventions to prevent and mitigate the risk of falls. For frail, high risk patients, adequate registered nurse presence is essential to deliver enhanced care observations and provide cognitive and psychological care, assist with mobility support, and regularly assess and implement the required interventions to support patient safety and care quality. Safe staffing tools should be used alongside professional judgement to ensure responsive allocation. Areas caring for frail older adults require enhanced staffing models due to higher dependency. Supporting guidance National Quality Board guidance (2016) on safe staffing sets out the expectations for providers in ensuring safe, sustainable, and productive workforce planning and sets expectations for Board-level assurance on safe staffing. NICE Guideline NG249 (2025), relevant to falls assessment and prevention, outlines best practice including identification of people at high risk of falls; comprehensive falls assessments covering gait, balance, cognition, continence, medications, vision, and environmental factors; tailored interventions to reduce risk and continued engagement in falls-prevention strategies. To ensure high standards of care, the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s safe staffing guidelines state that staffing must reflect skill mix, patient need, and safe ratios, and that organisations, not individuals, are responsible for ensuring safe, appropriate staffing levels. Regional response

The NHS England North East and Yorkshire Regional Team have liaised with Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust regarding your Report. Whilst the Trust will be responding directly to the Coroner in separate correspondence, they have advised the Regional Team of steps they have already taken regarding staffing. At the Trust’s February Board meeting, a business case was presented to propose an increase to nursing staff following a safer nurse staffing review. I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Patricia, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Sent To
  • Hull University Teaching Hospital
  • NHS England
Response Status
Linked responses 2 of 2
56-Day Deadline 25 Mar 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 11th April 2025, an inquest was opened and adjourned into the death of Patricia Irene Walker aged 87 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27th January 2026, the conclusion of the inquest was accidental death. Patricia Walker died in Castle Keep Care Home in Bransholme in Hull after being placed on fast-track discharge following an emergency admission to Hull Royal Infirmary. Her medical cause of death was recorded as: 1a. Acute on chronic bilateral subdural haematoma 1b. Multiple falls
2. Fractured neck of femur (operated), frailty of old age
Circumstances of the Death
Patricia Walker lived independently and, although had suffered some confusion and falls in the community, was able to look after herself and visited he husband in Castle Keep care home. She had a supportive family and decided she wanted to live closer to her nieces. She went with her niece to visit a bungalow with view to moving but tripped over shrubbery in the garden of the property and was conveyed by emergency ambulance to Hull Royal Infirmary where she was found to have suffered a fractured neck of femur. She was assessed as a falls risk as she was confused whilst on Ward 12 where she was placed from ED. Ward 12 is a trauma orthopaedics ward. She was admitted on 4th February and fell from the bed which had bed rails up at 03:40hrs. She suffered a head injury and was sent for a CT later that day at 09:47hrs. The scan revealed an acute bilateral subdural haematoma on chronic subdural haematoma which would need to be treated with burrhole surgery. This operation took place on 10th February; her fractured neck of femur having been operated on 9th February successfully but her neurological condition having deteriorated. The operation went ahead as planned but Mrs Walker suffered further falls whilst in hospital when she was transferred to Ward 90 which is one of the five frailty wards in the hospital. Staffing was sub optimal on Ward 90 at this time, with the staffing model being below the required four RGNs and three unregistered nurses on a day shift and three RGNs and two registered nurses on a night shift. One of the RGNs had been moved to a different ward leaving the ward short staffed on the night shift of 24th February. Mrs Walker suffered a further two falls whilst on Ward 90. Mrs Walker was placed on fast-track discharge and died in Castle Keep care home having ultimately failing to rally with poor nutritional intake and medication refusal and worsening confusion.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Quarterly assessment of staffing levels against population needs
Brook House Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Ensure senior manager presence and accessibility to staff
Brook House Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Pressure damage risk assessment
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Falls prevention plans
Staffing and skills mix review
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Safe staff numbers and skills
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
Responsibility for regulating and monitoring compliance
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care home staffing levels
NHS Litigation Authority Improvement of risk management
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care home staffing levels

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.