Nicola Mulliss

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2025-0453
Date of Report 4 September 2025
Coroner Thomas Crookes
Response Deadline ✓ from report 31 October 2025
All 1 response received · Deadline: 31 Oct 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A lack of policy for microbiological swabbing during wound re-suturing meant a Staphylococcus Aureus infection was not detected early, delaying crucial treatment.
View full coroner's concerns
In evidence I was told that had a swab been taken for microbiological analysis when the wound was re-sutured, it was possible that the Staphylococcus Aureus infection could have been detected at this earlier juncture and treatment instigated before the infection spread and resulted in the fatal staphylococcal meningitis. However, I was told that it is not policy / guidance for such testing to be undertaken so this did not occur.
Responses
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
30 Oct 2025
Action Planned
The Trust will strengthen pathways to ensure appropriate cultures are undertaken in a timely manner when a patient is suspected of having an infection, including wound swabs, and that, where clinically appropriate, patients are commenced promptly on antibiotics and compliance with these standards is regularly monitored. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Crooks

Thank you for your letter of 4th September 2025 following the inquest of NICOLA MULLISS, in which you issued a regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths.

The matter of concern you identified was:

‘In evidence I was told that had a swab been taken for microbiological analysis when the wound was re-sutured, it was possible that the Staphylococcus Aureus infection could have been detected at this earlier juncture and treatment instigated before the infection spread and resulted in the fatal staphylococcal meningitis. However, I was told that it is not policy / guidance for such testing to be undertaken so this did not occur.’

Our response:

I would like to express our condolences to the family of Miss Mulliss. I am grateful for your observations and we are committed to learning from this case to strengthen patient safety and clinical practice.

Having reviewed your comments, we can confirm that it is not clinically appropriate to take swabs of all leaking wounds. Wounds leak for a number of reasons, frequently as a result of the natural healing process. Serous or haemoserous fluid leaks (as occurred

2 in this case) are common, and part of the inflammation associated with all wounds. They are not indicative of infection. Like healthy skin, post operative wounds are seldom sterile and microorganisms can be isolated from all wounds whether they are infected or not. Isolating organisms does not always mean that the patient requires antibiotic treatment and unnecessary use of antibiotics can lead to increased antimicrobial resistance which is a global threat to health.

Staph aureus colonisation in the skin is common in the normal population, estimated to be around 1 in 3 people, although this can vary in different age groups or health risk factors. For certain procedures it is important to mitigate the risk of these and other organisms from causing infection by ensuring asepsis of the surgical field, administering prophylactic antibiotics among other measures. This is recognised by national and international guidelines (NICE, WHO, CDC, and other professional bodies).

Following your correspondence, I can confirm that we will strengthen our pathways to ensure that when a patient is suspected of having an infection, appropriate cultures are undertaken in a timely manner, including wound swabs and that where clinically appropriate, patients are commenced promptly on antibiotics. Compliance with these standards is regularly monitored, and we will also consider additional ways to strengthen these safeguards.

I hope this response reassures you that we are taking these issues very seriously and are constantly seeking to further improve our standards in this important area.
Sent To
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 31 Oct 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 20 February 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Nicola MULLISS. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest. The conclusion of the inquest was that Nicola Mulliss died from natural causes and recognised complications of a necessary surgical procedure. The medical cause of death was; 1a Infarction of Brainstem and Cerebellum 1b Staphylococcal meningitis 1c Wound infection with Staphylococcus Aureus following surgical Re-Excision of Meningioma of Sphenoid Wing II
Circumstances of the Death
Nicola Mulliss had a history of recurring meningioma for which she underwent excision surgery in 2009 and 2011. On 29 January 2025 she had a further such procedure and initially made a good recovery. She experienced some leaking from the wound on 2 February 2025 and it was re-sutured. Nicola Mulliss was re-admitted to hospital on 13 February 2025 and was found to have an infection to the operation site with staphylococcus aureus bacteria. This infection spread, resulting in staphylococcal meningitis which caused inflammation and swelling that disrupted the blood supply to her brain, leading to death on 18 February 2025.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Pre-1996 Transfusion Testing
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification
Eligibility Conditions for Infected Persons
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification
HCV Testing for Pre-1991 Transfusion Recipients
Penrose Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification
CDI senior assessment and treatment
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification
Laboratory specimen processing
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification
Effective CDI patient isolation
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification
Isolation for infectious diarrhoea
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Delayed patient infection risk notification

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.