Audrey Newman

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2025-0443
Date of Report 29 August 2025
Coroner Andrew Bridgman
Coroner Area Manchester South
Response Deadline est. 24 October 2025
All 1 response received · Deadline: 24 Oct 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A lack of trained ward doctors for lumbar punctures and the absence of a formal escalation pathway for assistance created significant delays in crucial diagnostic testing.
View full coroner's concerns
delay and and

The evidence of the Trust was that CSF analysis was CRUCIAL for diagnosing meningitis or encephalitis when infection is suspected_ Further, acyclovir is well recognised as drug giving rise to renal injury. In its LLO the Trust stated that; in recognition of the lack of training to enable ward doctors to undertake lumbar puncture a series of training sessions were held are to continue Within the LLO it is stated , There is learning in relation to escalation by doctors when a lumbar puncture is needed and hasn't been done either due to difficulty (eg agitation) or unavailability of competency trained doctors This has been discussed and case shared at the general medicine teaching sessions in April 2025. The witness speaking to the LLO said that requests for escalation are still informal and based on goodwill: There is no formal process for requesting assistance. The issue of concern is that in the absence of a formal pathway or referral process to the anaesthetic team for those cases which fall into the above category there is a significant risk of future delays in carry out crucial diagnostic tests and a risk of eath
Responses
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
6 Nov 2025
Action Planned
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust is rolling out training on using the IT booking system for theatres to medical staff, formulating a flowchart for escalating lumbar puncture procedures to anaesthetics, and ensuring patients awaiting lumbar punctures are not transferred off the acute medical unit or transferred off the unit on weekends to avoid delays. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Bridgman, I am writing to you further to the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Ms Audrey Newman on 22 August 2025, and in response to your request for assurance regarding the circumstances surrounding her care, specifically in the absence of a formal pathway or referral process to the anaesthetic team regarding Lumbar puncture procedure (LP) We would like to begin by expressing our sincere condolences to Ms Newman’s family. We recognise the distress caused by the events leading to her death and are committed to learning from this case to improve patient safety and care. Within adult medicine the number of lumbar punctures performed per week average between 10-15. The vast majority of these are done in a very timely manner i.e. within 12-24 hours, and within either the acute medical unit (AMU) or the medical same day emergency care unit (SDEC). Most lumbar punctures are done to exclude either a small brain bleed or meningitis. In rare cases they are done to exclude encephalitis or other more rare nervous system conditions. Very few LPs are done on the specialty medical wards as most would have been done within the first 24-72 hours of the admission on AMU or SDEC. The vast majority of LPs are done on AMU or SDEC and are successful in obtaining samples. On a few occasions the procedure is challenging. This is usually due either to the patient’s body

habitus (obese patients or those with spinal bone deformities) or in more rare cases because the patient is non-compliant or agitated. There is a process in place by which teams contact the anaesthetic team, in cases where the initial LP attempt failed. This involves contacting the anaesthetic senior doctor on call and once they agree to list the procedure by the anaesthetic team the patient is either transferred to theatre for the procedure to be performed or the anaesthetic team attend the ward to perform the procedure. The timeliness can vary and is dependent on other life-threatening emergencies that may need a much more urgent slot in theatre. Unfortunately, in Mrs Newman’s case despite the anaesthetic team being informed of the need for assistance in performing the procedure, there were delays, and as a result, we have enacted a program of work to tighten the process and prevent this from happening again. The details of this are outlined below:
1) In conjunction with the postgraduate department and some of the senior doctors within acute medicine, we have enacted a training program for all registrars working on the medical specialty wards to be signed off to perform lumbar punctures. The program involves signed off simulation sessions within the postgraduate department, then a supervised signed off procedure on a patient. Most registrars who have joined from overseas were competent in performing the procedure but required refresher training given the anxiety of joining a new healthcare system. This program is ongoing and I can report that all registrars have done the simulation sessions and the signing off for the live procedures is ongoing.
2) A meeting was arranged between senior members of the anaesthetic team and (Divisional Medical Director for Medicine and Urgent Care) to formalise the process of escalation of difficult LPs to the anaesthetic team:
• Training is being rolled out to all medical staff within the division of medicine to use the IT booking system for theatres (Theatreman) – this will allow any agreed procedure escalated to the anaesthetic team to be logged, giving visibility that a procedure is pending, and providing an audit trail. The lack of training in using this system was an issue as procedures would be agreed to be done by the anaesthetic team, but then there would be a delay in logging the procedure on Theatreman. It is important to note that this system would be very rarely used by staff in the medical division as they do not work in theatres which is why training was not part of the induction.
• The process of escalation to anaesthetics is being formulated into a flow chart that will be cascaded to all clinicians in the division of medicine and urgent care.

• Patients awaiting a lumbar puncture to exclude meningitis, encephalitis, or subarachnoid haemorrhage will not be transferred off the acute medical unit until the LP is performed successfully. If there is a need to escalate after failed attempts then this needs to be agreed and logged onto Theatreman before the patient is transferred to another medical ward.
• Patients awaiting a lumbar puncture will not be transferred off the unit on a Friday, Saturday or Sunday to avoid weekend related delays.

The elements above will prevent the delays that occurred in Mrs Newman’s case although one must note that to totally exclude encephalitis one would need a viral PCR which can take a number of days for the results to come back. We hope the information provided above offers assurance that Stockport NHS Foundation Trust has taken the findings of the inquest into Ms Audrey Newman’s care extremely seriously. We remain dedicated to continuous improvement in patient safety and care quality. Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sent To
  • CEO, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust Stockport NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 24 Oct 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 12.03.25 an inquest was opened into the death of Audrey Newman who died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 24 November 2024. The inquest concluded on 22.08.25. The investigation concluded on 03.02.23_ 1a) Renal failure 1b) Acyclovir treatment Ic) Encephalopathy of unknown cause The conclusion was one of Died from recognised risks of antiviral therapy for a suspected life-threatening condition.
Circumstances of the Death
Audrey Newman was admitted on the evening of 10 November 2024 following a seizure at home The working diagnosis was a suspected encephalitis and in accordance with guidelines treatment with antibiotics and antivirals (acyclovir) was commenced that evening. A lumbar puncture was planned for 11 November 2024 as part of the diagnostic pathway _ It was not carried out, according to the Trust's Lessons Learned Overview; because there was a lack of competent ward doctors to carry out such a procedure, especially for a patient as AN who was agitated and confused _ A lumbar puncture was eventually carried out on 18 November 2024 by the anaesthetic team was negative. The Trust also acknowledge in its LLO that occurred because no one consultant took ownership of the need and arrangements for the lumbar puncture_ On the pathological evidence, and that the lumbar puncture on 18 November was negative and that the Trust's witness talking to the LLO was not able to provide a rationale as to why the Trust felt that had a lumbar puncture been carried out on 11 November it would have been positive the inquest determined that had a lumbar puncture been carried out on 11 November 2024 it would likely have been reported_ within 24hrs , as negative the antiviral antibiotic treatment stopped sometime on 12 November 2024. Antiviral (and antibiotic) treatment continued on 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 November 2024_ albeit on a decreasing dosage from 13 November as there were concerns about diminishing renal function; a recognised complication of acyclovir: By 17 November 2024 AN had developed severe renal failure which did not respond to treatment_ No clinical or pathological cause was found for the presenting encephalopathy, namely the seizure and low conscious level; it is unlikely to have been infective encephalitis_ It was not possible to determine whether or not; had the antiviral and antibiotic treatment been stopped on 12 November 2024, AN would not have progressed to severe renal failure.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent the risk of future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Specialist Hepatology Centre Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Uncertainty About Fibrosis
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Fibroscan for Liver Imaging
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Consultant Hepatologist Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Commissioning Hepatology Services
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Transfusion Laboratory Staffing
Infected Blood Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Training in Transfusion Medicine
Infected Blood Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Resolve paramedic-driver shortage in mass casualties
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.