Sean Higgins

PFD Report 1 of 1 responses identified Ref: 2025-0133
Date of Report 11 March 2025
Coroner Patricia Harding
Response Deadline ✓ from report 7 May 2025
All 1 listed response identified · Deadline: 7 May 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Officers chairing ACCT reviews at HMP Rochester failed to read all relevant documentation, leading to inaccurate risk assessments, and some did not understand how to properly complete support plan paperwork.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) Although HMP Rochester had addressed many of the concerns raised by the PPO in advance of the inquest, evidence was given at the inquest that some officers chairing reviews did not read relevant documentation beyond the last ACCT review prior to the review taking place. Although they additionally looked at the last CSIP review where the processes were running in tandem, they did not read the ongoing record or Nomis case notes and were unable to conduct an accurate assessment of risk as a result (2) Some of the officers chairing reviews did not understand how to complete the support plan paperwork such that the ACCT was closed when some of the support plans had not started or had not been completed
Responses
HM Prison and Probation Service Central Government
6 Apr 2025
Action Taken
HMP Rochester produced a training video covering accurate assessment of risk and the quality of support plans and shared this with case coordinators and their line managers. Briefing sessions have been conducted with all case coordinators, focused on the concerns raised at the inquest. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Harding, REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 11 March 2025 following the inquest into the death of Sean Higgins at HMP Rochester, which was sent to the Ministry of Justice. I am responding on behalf of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) as Director General of Operations. I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Higgins family, and I would firstly like to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority. You have raised concerns regarding the Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) case management procedures at Rochester, specifically around the accurate assessment of risk and the quality of support plans. The Governor of HMP Rochester has provided assurances that these issues have been addressed, and the establishment have produced a training video covering both areas of concern. This has been shared with case coordinators and their line managers and is intended to ensure there is a clear understanding of the process among those responsible for conducting ACCT reviews and developing support plans.

To further embed understanding of existing procedures, HMP Rochester’s ’s Safety Team has conducted briefing sessions with all case coordinators, specifically focused on the concerns raised at the inquest. These sessions have been designed to reinforce the importance of thoroughly reviewing all relevant documentation, including ongoing case notes when assessing risk. They have also emphasised the need to create meaningful support plans that are actioned and fully implemented before initiating the closure of the ACCT. Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that action has been taken to address these matters.
Sent To
  • HMP Rochester
Responses Identified
Responses identified 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 7 May 2025
All listed responses identified
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 16th February 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Sean Higgins 45 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17th February 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide, the medical cause of death1a Suspension
Circumstances of the Death
Sean Higgins had a long history of mental health issues and substance abuse. His exact diagnosis was a maƩer of differing opinion between clinicians but alternaƟve diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, drug induced psychosis and personality disorder for which he was prescribed anƟpsychoƟc and anƟ-anxiety medicaƟon. In 2019 he was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and in 2021 he was transferred to HMP Rochester. Between September 2022 and August 2023 he had been placed on ACCT procedures on five previous occasions whilst at HMP Rochester aŌer concerns of self-harm were raised including aŌer making ligatures. The inquest invesƟgated the last few months of his life when he finished psychological therapy and was removed from the mental health team’s caseload. Coincident with this but not apparently because of it he started to self isolate and was managed under CSIP procedures. In December 2023 he stopped taking his medicaƟon. His mental health deteriorated. In early January 2024 an ACCT was opened when the deceased was discovered with a ligature . The ACCT remained open for the whole of January, with six reviews being held. The mental health team did not aƩend any of the reviews, although they provided a verbal contribuƟon for one which did not contain relevant informaƟon from which an accurate risk assessment could be made. The ACCT was closed without the support acƟons being completed (which included the prisoner engaging with the mental health team) and without consideraƟon of the available documentaƟon. The Custodial Manager and supervising officer on the wing who were responsible for closing the ACCT had been sent emails echoing that which was in the ongoing record that the deceased was hallucinaƟng and was talking of hanging himself which they had not read. There were mulƟple failures follow policies for both the prison and mental health staff. The deceased fashioned a ligature six days later and leŌ a note staƟng his mental health was torture. He had not received medicaƟon for 45 days and had not seen anyone from the mental health team for over two months. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) Although HMP Rochester had addressed many of the concerns raised by the PPO in advance of the inquest, evidence was given at the inquest that some officers chairing reviews did not read relevant documentation beyond the last ACCT review prior to the review taking place. Although they additionally looked at the last CSIP review where the processes were running in tandem, they did not read the ongoing record or Nomis case notes and were unable to conduct an accurate assessment of risk as a result (2) Some of the officers chairing reviews did not understand how to complete the support plan paperwork such that the ACCT was closed when some of the support plans had not started or had not been completed
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent referral training for organisations
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Taxi driver duty to report criminal activity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.