Annette Lewis

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2025-0126
Date of Report 6 March 2025
Coroner Kerrie Burge
Response Deadline est. 1 May 2025
All 1 response received · Deadline: 1 May 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Delays in implementing a "Failed Discharge" policy mean patients are not being appropriately referred for specialist review, increasing risks of re-attendance and errors in emergency departments.
View full coroner's concerns
Annette should have been referred for surgical review rather than being discharged. Work on a “Failed Discharge” policy has been ongoing for some time. When implemented, patients re-attending Emergency Departments in similar circumstances would be automatically and swiftly filtered to the appropriate specialist team, which would reduce the risks for those individual patients and reduce pressures and the consequent risk of errors within Emergency Departments. Progress with this policy has been difficult and there is no definitive timescale for implementation.
Responses
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board NHS / Health Body
21 Jul 2025
Action Taken
The Health Board has implemented a General Surgery policy, including guidelines for patients returning to the Emergency Department following discharge, and emphasized the responsibility for acting on test results. They also highlight training in place to support the practical application of the policy. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Burge, am writing in response to Regulation 28 Report issued to Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board (CTM UHB) o the 6th March 2025 following the inquest touching upon the death of Annette Lewis The Health Board acknowledges the matters of concerns raised in relation to the care that was provided at the Princess of Wales Hospital specifically in relation to failed discharge policy and action has been taken to address this.
1. General Surgery Policy CTM now has active and up to date guidelines to prevent recurrence of whathappened in Ms Lewis' case. This is a General Surgery policy that applies to the General Surgeons as well as to the Emergency Department (who have also had it discussed and shared Cadeirydd / Chair= Prif Weithredwr / Chief Executive; Croeso 'chiogyfathrebu &r bwrdd iechyd Yn Y Gymraeg neu'r Saesneg: Byddwn yn ymateb yn Yr un iaith a ni fydd hyn yn arwain at oedi. You are welcome to correspond with the Health Board in Welsh or English. We will respond accordingly and this will not delay the response; https (Ictuhbnhs alci Ms

wiueiy piease see peiow In Emergency Department section): The Guidelines for care and treatment for patients who return to an Emergency Department (ED) within CTM UHB with general surgical conditions following discharge from hospital within CTM UHB were approved at Quality & Safety Committee on the 25th March 2025. These guidelines are operational across the Health Board. It was discussed at the Surgical Governance Meeting (pan-health Board) on 13th March 2025 department Morbidity and Mortality meeting, and the new policy was shared with the entire team by email, Those involved have reflected and evidenced this as part oftheir appraisal. Finally, this policy has been included in our induction presentation to all starters. It is available on the Health Board SharePoint where all Guidelines and Policies are located for rapid access by colleagues:
2. Emergency Department Policy The Princess of Wales Emergency Department Guidelines have been circulated to all Doctors and Clinical Teams. In addition, information (including laminates clearly displayed on the department walls) is available in minors, paediatric and BRATZ (majors rapid assessment) for the whole multi-disciplinary team to see, be aware of and act upon; This is also the case in key areas in the other CTM Emergency Departments Royal Glamorgan and Prince Charles There is Princess of Wales Emergency Department Handbook and this policy has been added to it: This Handbook is available for all staff to refer to including agency and locum doctors: We hope that these actions, development and awareness of these guidelines can demonstrate a robust response to the extremely sad death of Mrs Annette Lewis and that the organisation has learned. We are confident that these steps would prevent further events of patient representing with symptoms
Part of a Series

2 separate reports were issued from this inquest, each sent to different organisations.

  • 2020-0004
    Sent to: Suicide Prevention Group, Isle of Wight CouncilNational Trust for the Isle of WightPublic Health for the Isle of Wight
    1 of 3 responded

This report (2025-0126) is shown above.

Sent To
  • Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 1 May 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 3 May 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Annette Lewis, which was concluded at the end of the inquest on 24/02/2025. The medical cause of death was established as: 1a Peritonitis and Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage 1b Perforated Pyloric Ulcer I reached a narrative conclusion: Annette Lewis, aged 73, re-presented at hospital on 15th. April 2023, for the second time that week, with worsening abdominal pain. Annette was discharged from hospital in the early hours of 16th. April, without full consideration of her symptoms and test results. Annette was declared deceased at her home on 18th. April 2023. On the balance of probabilities, Annette would have survived if she had been referred for a surgical review and treatment rather than being discharged. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Phone/Ffôn (01443) 281100 Fax/Ffacs (01443) 485862 These were recorded as: Annette Lewis attended the Emergency Department on 9th. April 2023 with abdominal pain and was discharged with antibiotics and painkillers. She re-attended the Emergency Department with worsening abdominal pain on 15th. April 2023 and was discharged on 16th. April with further medication and an outpatient referral for gastroenterology. The decision to discharge was made without sufficient weight being given to an internal Health Board document for investigating “Abdominal Pain in the Elderly” and Annette’s blood tests results had not been reviewed.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Uniform policy for obtaining technical advice
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Streamlining NHS construction quality procedures
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Information on common construction errors
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Independent validation of hospital construction
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
MAIB publication of implementation measures
Cranston Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Reconsider Phase 1 recommendations in light of Phase 2
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Reconsider LGA Guide paragraph 79.11 advice
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Add legal requirements warning to statutory guidance
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
Major project lessons learned
Include academics on statutory guidance advisory bodies
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
Major project lessons learned

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.