Khadija Kerri

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2025-0109
Date of Report 25 February 2025
Coroner Louise Slater
Response Deadline est. 22 April 2025
All 1 response received · Deadline: 22 Apr 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The hospital lacked a clear policy for disseminating addendum radiology reports from external providers to the treating clinical team, causing critical delays in identifying and treating a patient's fractures.
Responses
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
20 May 2025
Action Planned
The Trust has reviewed and scheduled for approval a revised Failsafe Alert for Radiological Findings (Communication Protocol) which will be uploaded to the Trust's intranet. A key amendment addresses communication of failsafe alerts, defining the process for "out of hours" critical findings. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mrs Slater

Khadija Kerri (deceased)

I write to you with respect to the Regulations 28 Report originally issued on the 25 February 2025 to the Doncaster & Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust following the Inquest into the death of Khadija Kerri concluded on the 5 July 2024. I understand that your initial notification was inadvertently missed; for which we extend our sincere apologies, and a follow up call to your office confirmed that the submission date of our response would be extended to 29 May 2025.

The report was received by the Chief Executive’s office and forwarded to me in order to provide a response.

I have been assisted in constructing this response by , Associate Medical Director for Clinical Safety and , Head of Service in Radiology.

I would respond to the matters of concern referred to within the PFDR as follows:

1. There is no clear internal policy/procedure within Doncaster Royal Infirmary for disseminating either an addendum report and/or the information contained within the addendum report from the external third party radiology service to the treating clinical team. If this is not addressed there is potential for similar delays and incorrect management of patient care I would like to take this opportunity of assuring you and Ms Kerri’s family that the Trust has undertaken a full review of the Failsafe Alert for Radiological Findings (Communication Protocol) PAT/T 38 v.5 and this is scheduled to be duly approved through the Local Clinical Governance processes by the 4 June 2025. Our Radiology department communicated with Everlight Radiology to ensure their full agreement with

amendments. The Protocol has been placed on the Trust’s Patient Safety Review Group agenda scheduled for 6 June 2025 for ratification.

Once fully approved and ratified, the protocol will be uploaded onto the Trust’s intranet within the Policies & Procedures section which is accessible by all staff. It is important to note this is a Trust-wide Policy which provides further enhancement to the safety of our patients on all hospital sites.

A key amendment to the Failsafe Protocol addresses your concern in terms of the Radiology Departmental procedures for communication of failsafe alerts. The procedure clearly defines that “out of hours” (tele- radiology reported) critical findings will be telephoned directly from the tele-radiology reporting radiologist directly to the referrer on site (“responsible person”) and a record of the conversation will be added as an addendum to the report issued.

In accordance with the Trust’s approved policy procedure, the Failsafe protocol will be audited within 3 months of implementation to ensure all “Failsafe notifications” are communicated and managed appropriately.

Whilst it is recognised that this revision is essential to ensure patient safety, it is acknowledged that the safety net contained within the protocol does not replace the Referrer’s responsibility to read and act upon radiology reports. This is in line with national guidance “Recommendations on Alerts and Notification of Imaging Reports”, published by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges October 2022.

This clinical responsibility will be further highlighted through Trust communications and it is the Trust’s responsibility to ensure this is actively communicated on a regular basis through governance processes.

I trust that this will reassure you that the communication alert processes contained with the revised protocol provides an enhanced safety net to undoubtedly make it safer for patients.
Sent To
  • Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 22 Apr 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 5 July 2024 commenced an investigation into the death of Khadija Kerri. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest with a Narrative conclusion of: Khadija Kerri died primarily as a result of heart disease, but her death occurred on background of traumatic injuries sustained in an unwitnessed fall and other co-morbidities. The medical cause of death 1a Acute Coronary Event 1b Ischaemic Heart Disease , Cardiomegaly, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Ic Il Fall, Multiple Fractures, Dementia; Type Il Diabetes Mellitus 4, CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Khadija Kerri was admitted to Doncaster Royal Infirmary on the 19th June 2024 with head laceration and multiple traumatic injuries following an unwitnessed fall downstairs at her home: CT scans were undertaken and reported by Everlight Radiology (a remote third party). These scan were reported on the 19th June 2024. Following a routine peer review the next discrepancy in radiological report was identified and the original CT report had missed two cervical fractures a rib fracture An addendum report was issued and telephone call made to Doncaster Royal Infirmary to advised of the new findings_ Despite the addendum report being uploaded on the shared system and a telephone call being made to the Emergency Department at Doncaster Royal Infirmary on the evening of the 2Oth June 2024,this information was not communicated to or acted acted upon by the clinical team caring for Ms Kerri until the 23rd June 2024. Following the full extent of her injuries being identified, the fractures were immobilised. Ms Kerri remained in hospital until her death on the 3rd July 2024. day; and

The third party provider identified the missed fractures within 24 hours and communicated this to Doncaster Royal Infirmary, however, this was not acted upon until the 23rd June 2024 due to there being no clear internal policy of disseminating an addendum report andlor it contents to the treating team: This lead to a delay in appropriate care. 5_CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern: In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1, There is no clear internal policylprocedure within Doncaster Royal Infirmary for disseminating either an addendum report andlor the information contained within the addendum report from the external third party radiology service to the treating clinical team_ If this is not addressed there is potential for similar delays and incorrect management of patient care_
Action Should Be Taken
Inmy opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:
Inquest Conclusion
1, There is no clear internal policylprocedure within Doncaster Royal Infirmary for disseminating either an addendum report andlor the information contained within the addendum report from the external third party radiology service to the treating clinical team_ If this is not addressed there is potential for similar delays and incorrect management of patient care_
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Documentation of technical adviser advice
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Recording case information on police systems
Southport Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Frontline staff access to full case information
Southport Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
School safeguarding recording systems
Southport Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Review of school attendance monitoring guidance
Southport Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Protocol for duty to assist referrals
Cranston Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Registration and Application Forms
Infected Blood Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Three-Cohort Prioritisation
Infected Blood Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.