Jaipreet Panesar

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2024-0645
Date of Report 25 November 2024
Coroner Heidi Connor
Coroner Area Berkshire
Response Deadline est. 20 January 2025
All 1 response received · Deadline: 20 Jan 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A patient was discharged without a care coordinator or key worker, and critical information sharing is hampered because different clinical note systems cannot access each other's records.
View full coroner's concerns
1. The Trust’s own internal investigation highlighted the fact that no care co-ordinator or key worker was provided to Jai after her discharge from hospital on 7th of September 2022. The Trust’s initial plan was to review this by June 2024, and the aim now is for January 2025, almost two years from Jai’s death.
2. It is still not possible for teams using RiO and the BTT systems to access each other’s clinical notes.
Responses
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
13 Jan 2025
Action Taken
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust has uploaded patient information from Buckinghamshire Talking Therapies (BTT) to Thames Valley & Surrey (TVS) Shared Care Records/Graphnet dating back to 1st May 2022, concluding in November 2024, and all patients accessing BTT will have information of their involvement with BTT uploaded on TVS each day. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Senior Coroner Connor,

Inquest into the death of Dr Jaipreet Panesar Report on Action to Prevent Future Deaths Response of Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust Thank you for your letter of 25th November 2024 following your conclusion into the tragic death of Dr Panesar. I write to respond to your concerns. The matters of concern that you identified are –

1. The Trust’s own internal investigation highlighted the fact that no care coordinator or key worker was provided to Jai after her discharge from hospital on 7th of September
2022. The Trust’s initial plan was to review this by June 2024, and the aim now is for January 2025, almost two years from Jai’s death.
2. It is still not possible for teams using RiO and the BTT systems to access each other’s clinical notes.

I understand that the Trust provided you with some documentation at the inquest relating to these issues, in particular a statement made by the team manager of the Trust’s Chiltern Crisis Resolution & Home Treatment team, a statement made by the Head of Inpatient Services for Buckinghamshire, an email from the Deputy Clinical Lead of Buckinghamshire Talking Therapies (BTT) and a copy of BTT’s standard operating procedure.

In relation to your first concern, I acknowledge that a delay in the completion of an action that arises from a patient safety incident investigation is a concern. I have asked to receive a report from the Oxford Healthcare Improvement Manager by the end of January 2025. In the meantime, I am satisfied that the Quality Improvement project has been progressing well. The purpose of this project is for us to ensure that the changes made are sustainable and Trust wide and that they do indeed mitigate against the risk of a similar event. I have been informed that a meeting takes place every fortnight in order to review progress (the most recent meeting was on 17th December 2024). The Trust is clear about the critical importance of the process by which a patient’s care is transferred from a ward to community teams. It is a process that will always remain under scrutiny by Trust governance and audit.

I understand that your second concern relates to records held by Buckinghamshire Talking Therapies (BTT). It was the case that members of our secondary care services did not have access to those records in 2022 and 2023. That remains the case, in that staff in secondary care services cannot log into BTT’s electronic records system direct. The position is that

2

secondary care services have access to a system called Thames Valley & Surrey (TVS) Shared Care Records/Graphnet, to which system BTT has uploaded patient information dating back to 1st May 2022. This upload concluded in November 2024. Subsequently, all patients accessing BTT will have information of their involvement with BTT uploaded on TVS each day (unless they have universally opted out of information sharing).

More generally, our Intranet contains guidance on the use of Thames Valley & Surrey Shared Care Records and this guidance was most recently updated on 12th December 2024.

For their part, some BTT staff have direct access to RiO, which is the electronic health records system used by the Trust’s secondary care services. Those staff include the admin team, referral co-ordinators in SPA, and supervisors. BTT’s standard operating procedure records the procedure for BTT staff to do so. I understand that you have received a copy of that operating procedure. I am satisfied that BTT’s access to RiO is established and effective for their purposes.

I hope that this response provides you with the information that you require, but of course please do not hesitate to contact me if I can assist further.
Sent To
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 20 Jan 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
The family requested me to refer to the deceased as Jai. I will reflect that in this report. I conducted an inquest into the death of Jai which concluded on 21st of November 2024. I recorded a conclusion of suicide.
Circumstances of the Death
Jai was a 36 year old GP. She was found deceased on 27th of April 2023. I have not detailed all of Jai’s contact with mental health services in this report. Instead, I have focused on aspects of the chronology which are relevant to the concerns I am raising. Jai referred herself to the Crisis Response and Home Treatment Team (“the crisis team”) on 21st of June 2022. She attended three appointments in June and July 2022, and was discharged from the crisis team to Buckinghamshire Talking Therapies (“BTT”) on 29th of July 2022. Whilst under this team, Jai disclosed that she had made previous suicide attempts. From August 2022 onwards, the mental health support that Jai received was from teams other than BTT. These teams used a different electronic records system (called Rio). They are part of the same NHS trust, but it was not possible for clinicians to access both systems. After an attempt to refer Jai to the crisis team (by her GP) on 31st of August 2022, Jai was provided with an appointment date with the community mental health team. The appointment date was 8th of September 2022. Before that appointment could happen, Jai attended accident and emergency (after being encouraged to do so by friends and her GP). She was then admitted as a voluntary patient to a psychiatric ward, until 7th of September 2022. After she was discharged, Jai was under the crisis team for around 10 days. After that, no medium or long term plan was put in place, and she was discharged back to the care of her GP. Jai took her own life in April 2023. She was not under secondary mental health services at the time of her death.
Copies Sent To
recipients who have an interest in this matter 1. NHS England I consider that these issues are likely to be national rather than only local 3. , Senior Coroner for Buckinghamshire, as a matter of courtesy
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion Performance Benchmarking
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion 2024 Review Progress
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Transfusion Outcome Framework
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
NHSBT Transfusion Outcome Funding
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Blood Tracking Systems Funding
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Single consultant data repository
Paterson Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Electronic Patient Information Systems
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Use of information for effective regulation
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.