Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Mia Louise Gauci- Lamport who died on 11 September 2023. Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 14 October 2024 concerning the death of Mia Louise Gauci-Lamport on 11 September
2023. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Mia’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Mia’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raises multiple concerns in relation to the medical care and appropriate monitoring of Mia, including concerns regarding the access to clinical consultant care and a lack of adherence to her care plan within the residential care setting at Tadworth Children’s Trust (TCT). Noting you have also sent your Report to TCT and CQC, some of the concerns you raise may be better addressed by those organisations. In this response, I have addressed the matters of concern where NHS England are able to contribute and provide some assurance.

My response to your Report has been informed by colleagues in the South East Region Direct Specialised Commissioning Quality team who commission 12 beds from Tadworth Children’s Trust (TCT) on behalf of NHS England for specialised rehabilitation for patients with complex needs. However, I should like to clarify that Tadworth Children’s Trust is also commissioned for other levels of rehabilitation and residential care funded by Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and local authorities. TCT have a total provision for up to 50 children. Whilst you have drawn our attention to previous concerns you have raised about TCT in an PFD report following the death of Connor Wellsted, TCT have confirmed that Mia was within its residential care provision commissioned by the local authority and was not in a specialised commissioning bed for which NHS England would have had oversight. Even though NHS England had no direct or commissioning oversight of Mia’s care, I should like to provide you and Mia’s family with some assurance that our regional Specialised Commissioning team has been working with TCT, alongside other stakeholders, to review the quality of care being provided. This has taken the form of Rapid Quality Review (RQR) meetings in accordance with the National Quality Boards guidance on risk response and escalation in ICSs where concerns are raised about a National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

09 December 2024

provider. This multi-stakeholder meeting gives specific, focused consideration to quality concerns or risks raised, helps to facilitate rapid diagnostic work and looks to formulate an agreed action and improvement plan with the provider. Such meetings bring together regional safeguarding, quality, local authority, acute trust, CQC and clinical and governance teams. A recent RQR meeting with TCT has resulted in an agreed plan for them to adopt the national paediatric early warning system (PEWS). This is a standardised approach for tracking the deterioration of children used in hospital settings. The acute trust paediatric nursing colleagues involved in the RQR meeting were positive about the steps TCT had taken so far to review and audit observations and monitoring. In addition, the nursing colleagues have offered to support TCT with training and education of staff and to act as a critical friend to improve nursing and carer practice on appropriate observation and monitoring. The PEWS system also has standardised charts for recording clinical information and observations which will also help improve consistency of medical record keeping at TCT. In terms of multi-disciplinary and collaborative care provision, at the RQR meeting, it was agreed that TCT would ensure children were only accepted when the correct care had been commissioned and that the right level of care could be safely provided. Whilst a RQR meeting helps support and implement plans for a provider following identification of a risk or concern, it also gives the provider a platform to raise concerns or challenges they have in being able to deliver that care. At the RQR meeting with TCT, it was acknowledged that they not been able to consistently engage with NHS partners to support their care pathways for each child in their care. Although the clinical teams at TCT have worked hard to form connections with primary care and clinical teams within the NHS, it is acknowledged that agreed pathways are not always easy to progress with those teams. To help bridge that relationship and ensure better consistency of collaborative care, TCT agreed to further their connections within the local integrated care system and with tertiary care providers to improve flow to clinical appointments. Our NHS England Regional Medical Director has also offered to support with connecting TCT’s clinical team to specialists within the NHS that can offer peer support and further improvement work. However, it would remain TCT’s responsibility to ensure consistency of multi-disciplinary clinical support for all children in their care, whether accessed via NHS or privately funded. I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mia, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action. Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.

Dear HM Coroner Karen Henderson

CQC response to prevention of future death report Mia Louise Guaci- Lamport Thank you for naming the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as a respondent in the prevention of future death report issued on 20/10/2024 following the death of Mia Louise Guaci-Lamport. We would like to extend our sincere condolences to Mia’s family.

The Children's Trust – Tadworth provides a residential children's home for children and young people with profound and multiple learning disabilities, a residential rehabilitation service for children and young people with acquired brain injury and a short breaks service. Ofsted are the lead regulator for The Children's Trust because of its status as a children’s home. The service is also registered with the Care Quality Commission but only for the regulated activity of treatment of disease, disorder, or injury. Therefore, the CQCs remit extends to regulation of this regulated activity only. CQC does however work closely with Ofsted as partner regulator.

We note that the concerns are as follows:

1. Lack of appropriate monitoring of Mia during the night:

HSCA Further Information Citygate Gallowgate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4PA

Telephone: 03000 616161 Fax: 03000 616171

2

Mia’s underlying illness caused seizures which were multifocal, complex and variable from tonic-clonic, myoclonic to cluster and absence seizures. Her care plan stipulated that carers should enter her room every 15 minutes to undertake visual observations throughout the night to ensure Mia was in a safe position, was breathing and not at risk of asphyxiation. However, this did not take place as frequently as specified. Moreover, it was common practice amongst some carers to review images from a video monitor placed over Mia’s cot rather than direct visualisation despite it being recognised that the monitor was insufficiently sensitive to reassure the carer that Mia was breathing, seizure free and safe from asphyxiation

On 11th September 2023 we received a notification from the registered manager at The Children’s Trust (TCT) regarding Mia’s death where we immediately requested a copy of TCT’s initial investigation and the outcome of the police report. The police report stated that Mia’s death was not being treated as a criminal investigation. We liaised closely with Ofsted, who also inspect and regulate accommodation, care and education at TCT. We were aware that they had scheduled an inspection imminently. Taking into consideration these factors, we made the decision to wait until the outcome of Ofsted’s inspection was known and could be considered alongside findings from TCT’s own external investigation before a CQC inspection.

Ofsted inspected TCT in September 2023 and rated them good in all areas. They issued one requirement of “Individual care plans must be explicit in relation to the levels of staff supervision required to meet children’s needs. Where this includes the use of visual monitoring, this needs to be included in children’s individual plans. Ensure that these plans are accessible and understood by all staff.”

On 18th October 2023 CQC requested the outcome of the external investigation from the registered manager at TCT. This wasn’t available, but TCT shared the findings with CQC of the internal investigation. Alongside the evidence of findings from the Ofsted inspection the CQC made the decision to await the external investigation findings before scheduling an inspection.

On 12th December 2023 CQC requested an update regarding the progress of the external investigation. TCT leadership team notified CQC they were not happy with the standard of the first external investigation report due to it not being sufficiently comprehensive and that they had commissioned a second external investigation. A comprehensive CQC inspection was scheduled for February 2024.

3

TCT continued to update CQC on the progress of the second external review. On 11th January 2024 we received an email from the registered manager at TCT to inform us they had now commissioned the second external review and terms of reference had been agreed.

In December 2023 CQC had received key information and started to plan for an inspection in February. On February 20th to 21st 2024 the CQC undertook a comprehensive inspection of TCT as part of our regulatory response to the notification of Mia’s sad death. The inspection looked at all five key questions of whether TCT is Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. (Please see attached PDF). CQC do not provide ratings for children’s homes that are registered with Ofsted, as per our policy.

During the inspection we reviewed a selection of audits and 18 children’s records, and we did not find any evidence of care deviating from that stipulated in the care plans. However, when speaking with staff we found a variance in their understanding of how visual checks should be undertaken. Therefore, we recommended that TCT should strengthen the detail of description of one to one care and observations related to overnight care within children and young people's care plans. TCT leaders informed the CQC that processes were immediately implemented to ensure all house managers were assured staff understood what actions were required during a visual check and children’s care plans were updated accordingly.

CQC assumed enforcement responsibility for health and safety related serious incidents concerning people using services in health and social care settings in England in April 2015. This is where people using services (SUs) have sustained avoidable harm including death, have been exposed to a significant risk of avoidable harm, or have suffered a loss of money or property as a result of a failure by the Registered Person. The ‘Registered Person’ (RP) is the Registered Provider and/or Registered Manager. We used the CQC specific incident guidance to make a decision about:
1. Does the information about the specific incident raise concerns about ongoing risk of harm to users of the service which CQC should inspect?
2. Does the information about the specific incident suggest the harm sustained was avoidable and may have resulted from a breach of a prosecutable fundamental standard?

When we received each new piece of information regarding Mia’s case, we reviewed this against our specific incident guidance and concluded that there was not a breach of prosecutable fundamental standard.

4

In July 2024 following the coroner’s inquest and information from the independent investigator report, CQC requested monthly updates from TCT regarding the providers audits of frequency of monitoring of children and their Paediatric Early Warning System (PEWS). The audits and actions taken, provided CQC with assurance the leadership team continued to take positive action to address any gaps in practice that the audits identified.

2. Medical Care provided to Mia:

Mia’s medical records at TCT were neither comprehensive nor easy to understand and did not conform to the expected standard in NHS general or hospital practice to ensure accurate and contemporaneous medical care was being reviewed and documented. Mia was a ‘looked after’ child with complex and challenging health needs and could not contribute or make decisions for herself. The independent investigator found regular PEWS (Paediatric Early Warning Scores) assessments were not undertaken to ensure Mia’s wellbeing despite it being within her care plan. There was no documented evidence that a multidisciplinary clinical review was regularly, if at all, undertaken to ensure Mia’s risk was regularly assessed, appropriate monitoring was in place, and care provision was meeting her needs. Mia was reviewed by a ‘privately-funded’ consultant employed by but working independently of Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital as and when requested by the medical staff at TCT. The consultant had no terms of reference and did not take responsibility for Mia’s ongoing care and was consulted only in relation to adjustments in her medication for seizure control. Due to financial constraints the consultant’s service level agreement was temporarily terminated and not available from April to October 2023. In this context, Mia was not under a specialist NHS paediatric neuro-consultant to ensure her ongoing medical needs conformed to expected practice nationally and for an independent consultant outside of TCT to have regular oversight and co-ordinate investigations and any further multi- disciplinary management she may need given this progressive life- limiting condition.

During the 20th – 21st February 2024 inspection the CQC reviewed 18 PEWS charts and found these had been fully documented with the correct escalation if the PEWS scores were escalating. We found: “evidence in children and young people's records that staff assessed, monitored, and managed risks well. Care plans we reviewed, were comprehensive and covered all aspects of the child and young person's life such as moving and handling, sleeping positions, medicines, and specific conditions such as epilepsy management”. Please see attached inspection report.

5

We have since received three months’ worth of PEWS audits which shows a 95-97% compliance rate with evidence of learning and improvements where required.

As per ’s witness statement it is our understanding that Mia was not without specialist NHS paediatric neuro-consultant care at any time as the paediatric neurology department at St George's Hospital (SGH), Tooting is the tertiary centre for paediatric neurology in the region. There is a shared care arrangement between the neurology department and the SGH and the paediatric department at Epsom hospital, therefore if Mia had required any specialist neurological care this would have been provided by Epsom hospital.

Prior to the inspection our review of evidence did not identify any deficits in care regarding children having ‘privately funded consultants’, therefore this was not an active line of enquiry. However, with regards to regular oversight and co-ordination of investigations we found during the February 2024 inspection that “the medical team have monthly complex case discussions. This is an opportunity for the full multidisciplinary team to learn from each other and reflect on cases that have gone well and identify areas for improvement”. We found all children were able to access NHS services either through their local NHS hospital or the tertiary centre they were receiving treatment from. The February 2024 report noted “The doctors at the Children's Trust attended transition planning meetings and advocated for tertiary and GP care. They oversaw the transition planning and referred to specialist clinics as required”.

Following the Coroner’s inquest, we requested an update regarding TCT’s governance arrangements around independently practicing consultants. TCT told us that all the consultants they were currently using all had substantive posts within an NHS trust, but that they were reviewing their governance processes regarding if a clinician did not have a substantive post within an NHS trust.

3. Senior management, Children’s Trust, Tadworth:

The lack of a robust and adhered to care plan for night observations for Mia mirrors the same concern in the PFD report I issued following the Inquest touching on the death of Connor Wellsted at TCT in 2022. The Independent investigator commissioned by TCT highlighted ongoing clinical governance limitations including the initial management and investigation of Mia’s death, delay in fulfilling the Duty of Candour’ obligations, ongoing staff training, ensuring robust

6

procedures were in place alongside regular audits of clinical practice. These are the same issues highlighted in the PFD report I issued touching on the death of Connor Wellsted two years previously.

Since the sad death of Connor Wellsted in 2022 and Mia’s death, CQC have undertaken three subsequent inspections which have demonstrated that TCT have taken the appropriate actions to ensure the governance processes around night time observations have been strengthened. CQC is assured with regard to it’s own regulatory functions, by the actions taken by TCT. Specifically this includes to strengthening the frequency of monitoring policy and increased their audits of the implementation of this policy.

During the February 2024 inspection we found all staff had received the appropriate level of training relevant to their role and the healthcare activity they deliver.The education team provided child and young person specific training as the need arose. We also noted that “staff demonstrated knowledge of the Duty of Candour, to be open and transparent with people including when things go wrong with their care and treatment”. In Mia’s case there was a delay in executing the Duty of Candour, however the CQC did not deem this instance to be a breach of Health and Social Care Regulations.

CQC have seen evidence of a strengthened learning culture at TCT through inspection and routine engagement conversations. We have seen progress in their action plan against the recommendations made by CQC from both the January 2020, May 2021 and February 2024 inspections and the external investigation of Mia’s death. In addition TCT had a Frequency of Monitoring Policy in place since July 2022 which continues to be reviewed and updated. TCT have taken appropriate action to ensure they are not in breach of Regulation 12 safe care and treatment.

The senior leadership team at TCT continue to be receptive and responsive to challenge and proactive in providing information to CQC to demonstrate how improvements have been made in response to incidents, complaints and inspection findings.

The CQC will continue to work closely alongside Ofsted to monitor and inspect according to our current inspection methodology and continue to respond to any emerging risk identified through monthly data assurance reports, regular engagement meetings, notifications or whistleblowing reports.

7

Dear Dr Henderson,

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 14 October sent to the Secretary of State about the death of Mia Louise Gauci-Lamport. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for Patient Safety.

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mia’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.

The report raises concerns around the:
1. lack of appropriate monitoring of Mia during the night;
2. medical care provided to Mia and;
3. senior management at The Children’s Trust (TCT), Tadworth.

In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England (NHSE) and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to ensure we adequately address your concerns.

I deeply sympathise with the family and your concerns, which as you state in the report were also raised two years ago. It is important to understand what occurred to fully grasp the reasons for this unfortunate death, and what measures will be put in place to stop it from happening again. We have sought assurances from CQC and NHSE, who further sought assurance from TCT, that responses are being prepared to address concerns respective to each organisation.

In parallel, the CQC inform us that they are monitoring the service to ensure that children residing there are not exposed to risk or unsafe care, which is of utmost importance so deaths such as Mia’s can be prevented. CQC regulates the premises and the care provided, and they are reviewing any information received to help inform the next inspection. NHSE have informed us that their regional specialised service team commissioned some beds at TCT for specialised rehabilitation for those with complex needs, but it appears that

Mia was in a residential care bed, which is commissioned instead by the Local Authority. The commissioning body, in this case the LA, has the responsibility for oversight of the quality of the service. NHSE have provided assurance that their regional team has been working with system and other partners on responding to risks and concerns in a joint approach at this provider, which will be set out in their response. In case of interest, NHSE’s guidance on specialised services can be found here: NHS commissioning » Specialised services. In relation to your point about the delay in fulfilling the duty of candour obligations, as you may be aware, the statutory duty of candour (organisational) places a direct obligation upon NHS trusts and all other health and social care providers registered with the CQC to be open and honest with patients, service users and their families, when a notifiable safety incident occurs. The Government is supportive of the review on the duty it inherited from the previous administration and will consider the findings, recently published on 26 November, following a call for evidence in April this year. The government will consider these findings alongside findings from the ongoing manager regulation consultation as it continues to develop policy on candour in healthcare. The Department’s aim is to ensure the NHS can better meet the objectives of the statutory duty of candour and work with patients as partners to support a culture of learning and continuous improvement.

Patient Safety is of utmost importance for this government across all services. I strongly believe that lessons learnt must be implemented robustly to change the way patient safety is approached in healthcare, and that they are enduring.

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.

1

Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths, Mia Gauci-Lamport

Coroner’s Concerns

The matters of concern are as follows:

1. Lack of appropriate monitoring of Mia during the night.

Mia’s underlying illness caused seizures which were multifocal, complex and variable from tonic-clonic, myoclonic to cluster and absence seizures. Her care plan stipulated that carers should enter her room every 15 minutes to undertake visual observations throughout the night to ensure Mia was in a safe position, was breathing and not at risk of asphyxiation.

However, this did not take place as frequently as specified. Moreover, it was common practice amongst some carers to review images from a video monitor placed over Mia’s cot rather than direct visualisation despite it being recognised that the monitor was insufficiently sensitive to reassure the carer that Mia was breathing, seizure free and safe from asphyxiation.

2. Mia’s medical records at The Children’s Trust were neither comprehensive nor easy to understand and did not conform to the expected standard in NHS general or hospital practice to ensure accurate and contemporaneous medical care was being reviewed and documented.

Mia was a ‘looked after’ child with complex and challenging health needs and could not contribute or make decisions for herself. Regular PEWS (Paediatric Early Warning Scores) assessments were not undertaken to ensure Mia’s well-being despite it being within her care plan.

There was no documented evidence that a multidisciplinary clinical review was regularly, if at all, undertaken to ensure Mia’s risk was regularly assessed, appropriate monitoring was in place, and care provision was meeting her needs.

Mia was reviewed by a ‘privately funded’ consultant employed by but working independently of Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital as and when requested by the medical staff at The Children’s Trust. The consultant had no terms of reference and did not take responsibility for Mia’s ongoing care and was consulted only in relation to adjustments in her medication for seizure control. Due to financial constraints the consultant’s service level agreement was temporarily terminated and not available from April to October 2023.

In this context, Mia was not under a specialist NHS paediatric neuro-consultant to ensure her ongoing medical needs conformed to expected practice nationally and for an independent consultant outside of The Children’s Trust to have regular oversight and co-

2 ordinate investigations and any further multi-disciplinary management she may need given this progressive life limiting condition.

3. Senior management at The Children’s Trust, Tadworth.

The lack of a robust and adhered to care plan for night observations for Mia mirrors the same concern in the Prevention of Future Deaths report I issued following the Inquest touching on the death of Connor Wellsted at The Children’s Trust in 2022.

The Independent investigator commissioned by The Children’s Trust highlighted ongoing clinical governance limitations including the initial management and investigation of Mia’s death, delay in fulfilling the Duty of Candour’ obligations, ongoing staff training, ensuring robust procedures were in place alongside regular audits of clinical practice.

Regulation 29: Response from The Children’s Trust, Action to Prevent Future Deaths, Mia Gauci-Lamport The tragic death of Mia has deeply affected all of us at The Children’s Trust and our thoughts continue to extend to Mia’s family and loved ones. We fully acknowledge the importance of the coroner’s concerns raised in the Prevention of Future Deaths report and take this and every opportunity to review our practices and ensure that lessons are learned. We are committed to continuously improving our services, strengthening our systems, and ensuring the highest standards of care for the many families and carers who put their trust in us, and to working in partnership particularly with the children in our care and their families. We have taken immediate and comprehensive steps to address the areas raised in the report. We acknowledge that whilst significant improvement work has been undertaken in these areas in recent years, further work was, and is, still needed. This response outlines the actions already taken and the improvements we continue to make. We remain focused on creating an environment where children with complex needs receive care that meets the highest standards, and we are fully engaged with external stakeholders to ensure that our practices are aligned with the most current guidelines and evidence-based practice. Since the inquest, The Children’s Trust has been inspected by Ofsted Care who rated the residential care provided to the children and young people as Good. Action Taken by The Children’s Trust Review and Update of Care Plans and Monitoring Protocols A comprehensive review of our monitoring protocols and individualised care planning process has been undertaken which has led to several critical actions being identified, all of which are now overseen by robust internal governance: o Policy and Clinical Guideline: The Frequency of Monitoring Policy has been initially reviewed and updated to ensure it is clear and consistent and can be individualised for each child through specific clinical guidelines. This ensures monitoring practices are personalised to meet each child's unique needs and based on

3 individualised risk assessments. Further work is now needed to align the policy with national best practice relevant to the unique care setting at The Children’s Trust. This work has commenced and requires wider input and critique to ensure that a significant and safe revision to our approach and policy is designed and implemented. o Monitoring Tools: A review of monitoring tools, including video surveillance and wearable sensors, has been completed. We continually ensure that these tools are appropriate for each child's needs and used correctly to provide effective oversight without replacing appropriate checks. This initial action is complete and is now continuously reviewed and audited in line with evidence-based practice. o Individualised Care Plans: We have made certain that care plans are clear, individualised, and regularly updated based on the child’s current needs and challenges and aligned to the PEWS (Paediatric Early Warning Scores). These updates ensure that the monitoring of children is consistent, personalised, and aligned with the latest clinical guidelines. This initial work is complete and is now continuously reviewed and audited in line with our policy and best practice.

o Shift Handover Protocol: A revised Shift Handover Protocol has been introduced to ensure that the level of supervision and observation required for each child is understood and clearly communicated during shift changes. Additionally, the last set of clinical observations from the prior shift are recorded and discussed at handover, ensuring a seamless transition and continuity of care. This protocol has been embedded across The Children’s Trust and is subject to continuous review and audit to ensure compliance.

o Frequency of Monitoring and PEWS Practice Audits: We have implemented new Frequency of Monitoring Practice audits overnight, conducted by Clinical Site Managers. This ensures continued compliance with the monitoring and observations policies. These audits are complemented by monthly quality walks to ensure the consistent implementation of care plans and protocols. This additional assurance mechanism is built into roles and responsibilities and findings from these audits feed into the broader clinical governance framework.

o Reporting and External Oversight: The results of relevant audits are reported to both The Children’s Trust regulators, The Care Quality Commission and Ofsted, monthly, ensuring external oversight and accountability. Furthermore, we are working with the wider health and social care system to continually revise and improve our protocols, ensuring they are evidence-based, benchmarked, and consistent with the best practices in residential settings. This work continues and is taking place through existing NHS governance frameworks. Integration and Multidisciplinary Working Recognising the need for greater integration with NHS services, particularly for children with complex health conditions such as epilepsy, we have already taken significant steps to strengthen our collaboration with NHS partners to ensure the children and young people in our care have equal access to NHS resources and expertise:

4

o Enhanced NHS Integration: The Children’s Trust is actively working with primary, secondary and tertiary NHS services to ensure that children in our care receive timely and regular access to care. We are working with the wider health and social care system to formalise clearer referral pathways and improving coordination with NHS specialists to ensure that all clinical needs are addressed promptly. This work has commenced and continues through existing NHS governance frameworks.

o Reducing Reliance on Private Consultants: We are actively reducing our reliance on private consultants for ongoing care, particularly in areas such as epilepsy management, and are working to ensure that children receive care that is fully integrated within the NHS. We have required wider health and social care system support to ensure equitable access for the children and young people in our care and this work continues.

o Multi-disciplinary Care Model: We are working with the broader NHS system to improve integration across the whole care pathway and ensure that this is multi- disciplinary across medical, nursing and care and therapy, and not focussed solely on the medical care for the children and young people. Whilst we have a strong internal multi-disciplinary care model focussed around the care of the children, we have also taken the opportunity to commence a detailed review of our internal model alongside broader integration.

o Medical records: We continually audit our medical records in line with NHS standards and achieve high compliance against these. As an organisation sitting outside the NHS, health record integration is complex and an ongoing area of focus for us with our wider health and social care system partners. Medical record audits continue regularly to ensure our ongoing compliance in this area. Leadership and Governance Improvements The Children’s Trust is committed to maintaining and improving robust governance and oversight systems. We have initiated a series of improvements: o Strengthened Governance Framework: We have reviewed and begun to refine our clinical governance structure to ensure that all care practices are subject to rigorous oversight and that systems are in place to monitor adherence to protocols and standards. This includes strengthening review processes and ensuring that leadership is engaged in overseeing the implementation of improvements. This programme of work is in process with some immediate actions taken.

o Regular Audits and Reviews: To support sustained improvement, we have introduced regular audits to assess the quality of care, the implementation of and adherence to care plans, and the effectiveness of our monitoring practices. This work continues and is scrutinised both internally and by our external regulators and commissioners.

5

o Thematic review: We have undertaken a thematic review of all serious incidents and near misses within a specific timeframe. The themes and trends identified through this review have resulted in dedicated workstreams being embedded into the existing governance structure. The thematic review is currently in the final stages of completion and has focussed on the embedding of continuous quality improvements. System-Wide Risk Summit In response to the Coroner’s Regulation 28 report, The Children’s Trust called a System- Wide Risk Summit which was held on November 14, 2024. The summit brought together a wide range of external stakeholders, including NHS England, NHS providers as well as social care partners, commissioners, regulators, and expert consultants. The summits' goal was to discuss the concerns raised by the coroner and identify actionable steps to strengthen care practices, ensuring that The Children’s Trust’s processes are aligned with national standards and evidence-based practice. The summit focused on two key areas: Medical Care Provision for the Children and Young People: o The summit discussions highlighted the challenges in relation to the integration with broader NHS paediatric services for the children within residential care at The Children’s Trust. This was particularly explored for complex conditions such as epilepsy. It is essential, for us and the wider system, to recognise that children in our care are entitled to the same standard of, and access to, NHS services they would receive elsewhere. The identified gap in access to NHS paediatric specialists in the management of epilepsy, is being urgently addressed as part of ongoing work with system colleagues. The Children’s Trust has taken proactive steps in collaboration with NHS partners to ensure equitable access to NHS services, upholding the parity of care and ensuring children receive appropriate care alongside and enhancing the medical provision provided by The Children’s Trust. Monitoring and Observation of Children and Young People o The summit examined the current practice and policy in relation to monitoring and observation, particularly around night-time care, and explored ways to ensure that care plans are adhered to consistently as well as what is appropriate within a residential care setting for medically stable children. There was clear recognition that wider health and social care system support as a critical friend is readily available in relation to this complex issue, and that the current policy and processes in place far exceed those within a variety of healthcare settings. Further revisions to the policy are planned following ongoing engagement with system partners.

6

Ongoing Actions To ensure that improvements are embedded within The Children’s Trust, the following ongoing actions (also detailed within the narrative above), have been identified:
1. Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Care Model o Action: Further strengthen integration with NHS services to ensure equal and timely access to care for children with complex health needs.
2. Monitoring and Observation o Action: Further revise monitoring protocols and care plans in line with best practice and with wider system engagement and support.
3. Governance and Policy Development o Action: Further strengthen clinical governance frameworks and ensure ongoing and robust oversight of all care practices. Summary We remain committed to ensuring the highest standards of care for all children and young people at The Children’s Trust. We fully recognise the importance of the concerns raised in the Coroner’s Regulation 28 report and have taken immediate steps to enhance our practices and systems. Through collaboration with our NHS and wider system partners, continuous engagement with stakeholders, children and families, and a strong focus on improving clinical governance, we are confident that these changes will result in tangible improvements to the care we provide. We remain fully engaged in this process and will continue to review and refine our practices to ensure that all children receive the safest, highest quality care possible.