Nicola Lacey

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2024-0340
Date of Report 26 June 2024
Coroner Hugh Gregory
Coroner Area Herefordshire
Response Deadline est. 21 August 2024
All 1 response received · Deadline: 21 Aug 2024
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The deceased had a responsible position within Healthcare, but no further details are provided in the concerns text.
View full coroner's concerns
There was no answer at the address and therefore the Police were called. Police attended the scene and forced entry. The Police established that Nicola Jane Lacey had died. A note identified the deceased's intentions. Nicola Jane Lacey had a responsible position within Healthcare.
Responses
Hereforshire and Worcestershire NHS Integrated Care Board
20 Aug 2024
Action Taken
The Trust has developed two Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), one for within working hours and one for out of hours, to ensure the process for disclosing colleagues' mental health difficulties is clear and followed routinely; these SOPs are now in place and will be added to their Position of Trust Policy. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Sirs,

Re: Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths in respect of Ms Nicola Lacey

I am writing in response to your report to prevent future deaths dated 26th June 2024 addressed to me, I am grateful for the opportunity of responding to your concerns.

The Trust is always keen to learn from any tragic incident and I hope that this response satisfies you that we have reviewed the issues raised appropriately.

Your concern:

Procedures should be clear and known to employers concerning appropriate disclosure of a colleagues ongoing mental health difficulties for the benefit of both the individual concerned and the safety of the wider public.

The Trust can confirm that when working with patients with ongoing mental health difficulties we routinely assess the risks associated with themselves and others. If it is identified that this risk relates to or is relevant to their employment, we would in the first instance discuss this with the patient and seek informed consent for the employer to be advised of any necessary concerns. The importance of a therapeutic relationship is critical to supporting patients in their recovery. If a patient does not agree to discussions taking place with their employer about their health, practitioners have very clear parameters when they need to consider if they should breach confidentiality. In order to support such a decision, our clinical staff have access to both management and clinical supervision, safeguarding supervision, as well as access to other professional advice such as through our legal or information governance teams, or our Caldicott Guardian.

If we have any concerns about anyone who works or volunteers with adults with care and support needs we would also consider this in regards to ‘A Person in a Position of Trust’ (PiPoT) framework.

The Person in a Position of Trust Framework is applicable where there is an allegation or concern about an adult who works or volunteers in a position of trust with adults with care and support needs, employers, student bodies and voluntary organisations. In Herefordshire this framework is agreed and overseen by the Herefordshire Safeguarding Adult Board and a copy can be found here Positions-of-Trust-Framework-1.pdf (herefordshiresafeguardingboards.org.uk) In this situation where concerns arise the clinical team notify our Safeguarding team who then co- ordinate an appropriate discussion with professional advice and a decision is made using the Position of Trust Framework as to whether information is shared with an employer or not.

Action:

To ensure this process is clear, known to staff and followed routinely we have developed 2 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), one within working hours and one for out of hours. These SOPs are now in place and will be added to our Position of Trust Policy. Please find both SOPs attached for your information.

In addition, I can confirm the author of the report who adduced oral evidence at court has been contacted to ensure she is happy with the above process. As an organisation, we always prioritise the mental health and well-being of our staff. We understand that mental health is just as important as physical health, and we are committed to creating a supportive and inclusive work environment that promotes mental wellness.

We hope the above reassures you that we do offer resources and support for employees who may be struggling with mental health concerns. Our goal is to ensure that all staff members feel supported valued and able to thrive both personally, and professionally. We believe that by promoting mental health we create a positive and protective work culture for everyone.

Conclusion:

I would like to thank you for drawing this matter to my attention, I confirm that the point you raised has been carefully considered and the response set out above. I confirm that I have no submissions to make about publishing this response.

If you have any further queries do not hesitate to contact me.
Sent To
  • Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 21 Aug 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 13 January 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Nicola Jane LACEY. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 12 June 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide.
Circumstances of the Death
Nicola Jane Lacey lived alone in a large property in rural Herefordshire. She had recently separated from a partner. On the 30th December 2022, the deceased did not attend work and did not call anyone. This raised concern. As a consequence a member of staff who worked with the deceased attended her address. There was no answer at the address and therefore the Police were called. Police attended the scene and forced entry. The Police established that Nicola Jane Lacey had died. A note identified the deceased's intentions. Nicola Jane Lacey had a responsible position within Healthcare.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

IPC Structures and Transmission Risk
COVID-19 Inquiry
Patient safety governance
ICU Resource Allocation Framework
COVID-19 Inquiry
Patient safety governance
HTA require anatomy adverse incidents reported as HTARIs
Fuller Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Community Advisory Body
Infected Blood Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Patient Satisfaction in Clinical Audits
Infected Blood Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Single consultant data repository
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Regulatory system patient safety priority
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Suspension during investigation
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Information sharing between providers
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Independent sector NHS contract qualification
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.